Politics

What Commerce’s WeChat-TikTok announcement really means

Will WeChat and TikTok stop working Sunday? What does this mean for TikTok's competitors? And other questions, answered.

What Commerce’s WeChat-TikTok announcement really means

Both TikTok and WeChat will be banned from U.S. app stores by Sunday, barring a deal for TikTok.

Image: Visuals

The Department of Commerce announced Friday that it would ban both WeChat and TikTok from U.S. app stores beginning on Sunday in response to President Trump's August executive orders, which prohibited any transactions with either platform as of Sept. 20.

The Commerce Department's notice clarifies those orders, specifying that WeChat will also be prohibited from using U.S. internet hosting or content delivery network services beginning Sunday. TikTok will be barred from doing so starting Nov. 12.

The announcement added to the confusion that has been building around TikTok for weeks, as a who's who of corporate giants, including Microsoft, Oracle and even Walmart have battled for a stake in the hugely popular video-sharing site.

Here are answers to some of the big questions about the fate of TikTok and WeChat in the United States.

Does this mean WeChat and TikTok will stop working on Sunday?

WeChat, yes. TikTok, no. The Commerce Department will prohibit either app from appearing in U.S. app stores or accepting updates as of Sunday. That means new users in the U.S. won't be able to download either WeChat or TikTok starting Monday at midnight, and existing users won't receive updates to the apps. But only WeChat will break completely because, unless it can find a workaround, it won't be able to use U.S. hosting services. That won't happen for TikTok until mid-November. Even though it won't be available to new users, TikTok won't be removed from current users' phones. Apple makes clear that an app's removal from the App Store doesn't prevent current users from accessing it on their device. But without updates, TikTok's functionality could steadily deteriorate.

Isn't TikTok about to get sold off? What happens then?

TikTok's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, has been negotiating a deal for weeks in hopes of satisfying the president's national security concerns. If it secures a deal, then the Commerce Department's announcement will be lifted for TikTok. (But not for WeChat.) According to recent reports, a deal is expected to be reached this week. But even if that doesn't happen, this announcement means that TikTok has until Nov. 12 to reach a deal and avoid a true disaster scenario in the U.S.

Where does the deal stand?

Details of the TikTok deal appear to change every hour. The most recent reporting suggests that Oracle will take a minority stake in the company and lead its U.S. operations, hosting and processing U.S. user data. TikTok would also reportedly appoint a U.S. government-approved board of directors, consisting of U.S. citizens and an independent security expert. But what role and ownership stake ByteDance will continue to have remains unclear. President Trump has said he would not be happy about a deal that left ByteDance with majority ownership. But the Commerce Department's timeline gives TikTok plenty of time to reach an agreement.

Who else will this affect?

The fallout from this announcement won't just affect WeChat, TikTok and their users. It will also have implications for the many other businesses that work with WeChat and TikTok. TikTok, for instance, signed a three-year agreement with Google to purchase $800 million in cloud services last year. Such an agreement would be prohibited after November under the Commerce Department's ruling.

The announcement will also affect both Apple and Google, which will be forced to pull one of their top-performing apps, TikTok, from their app stores in the U.S. Because the order is limited to only U.S. app stores, however, Apple may escape a worse fate predicted by some analysts, who worried that if the Trump administration forced Apple to remove WeChat from the App Store worldwide, it could tank iPhone sales by as much as 30%.

One category that could get a boost from the ruling: VPNs, which will be used to get around the restrictions. On Friday, the term "VPNs" was trending on Twitter in the U.S.

What does this mean for TikTok employees?

TikTok has been on a hiring spree this year, more than tripling its U.S. headcount since January. When President Trump issued his August executive order, some employees worried that the prohibition on transactions with ByteDance could stand in the way of them getting paid after Sept. 20. One employee, Patrick Ryan, even took the Trump administration to court over it. The case has since been dismissed, after the Department of Justice said the Commerce Department would clarify the order so that it wouldn't apply to employee compensation. With this announcement, the Commerce Department is making clear what types of transactions President Trump's orders apply to. "Any other prohibitive transaction relating to WeChat or TikTok may be identified at a future date," the Department wrote.

Is this good for TikTok and WeChat's competitors?

Not according to them. Adam Mosseri, head of TikTok's most direct rival, Instagram, has repeatedly warned against the risks of creating a bifurcated internet based on different countries' national security interests. From Mosseri's point of view, all internet companies benefit from being able to expand globally, reaching users regardless of where in the world they live. "I've said this before, but a U.S. TikTok ban would be quite bad for Instagram, Facebook, and the internet more broadly," Mosseri tweeted Friday. "If you're skeptical keep in mind that most of the people who use Instagram are outside the U.S., as is most of our potential growth. The long term costs of […] countries making aggressive demands and banning us over the next decade outweigh slowing down one competitor today."

Legal scholars echoed Mosseri's concerns on Friday, noting that the announcement sets a dangerous precedent for U.S. citizens' First Amendment rights. "It's a mistake to think of this as (only) a sanction on TikTok and WeChat," wrote Jameel Jaffer, director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. "It's a serious restriction on the First Amendment rights of U.S. citizens and residents — a restriction that the Trump admin should have to justify."

TikTok is currently challenging President Trump's executive order in court. On Friday, TikTok's interim head Vanessa Pappas replied to Mosseri, urging Facebook to get behind the case. "We agree that this type of ban would be bad for the industry," Pappas wrote. "We invite Facebook and Instagram to publicly join our challenge and support our litigation. This is a moment to put aside our competition and focus on core principles like freedom of expression and due process of law."

Workplace

Netflix’s layoffs reveal a larger diversity challenge in tech

Netflix just laid off 150 full-time employees and a number of agency contractors. Many of them were the company’s most marginalized employees.

It quickly became clear that many of the laid-off contractors possessed marginalized identities.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

After Netflix’s first round of layoffs, there was a brief period of relief for the contractors who ran Netflix’s audience-oriented social media channels, like Strong Black Lead, Most and Con Todo. But the calm didn’t last.

Last week, Netflix laid off 150 full-time employees and a number of agency contractors. The customary #opentowork posts flooded LinkedIn, many coming from impacted members of Netflix’s talent and recruiting teams. A number of laid-off social media contractors also took to Twitter to share the news. It quickly became clear that similar to the layoffs at Tudum, Netflix’s entertainment site, many of the affected contractors possessed marginalized identities. The channels they ran focused on Black, LGBTQ+, Latinx and Asian audiences, among others.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.

Fintech

Crypto doesn’t have to be red or blue

Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand are backing bipartisan legislation that establishes regulatory clarity for cryptocurrencies. This is the right way to approach a foundational technology.

"Crypto doesn’t neatly fall along party lines because, as a foundational technology, it is — or should be — inherently nonpartisan," says Diogo Mónica, co-founder and president of Anchorage Digital.

Photo: Anchorage Digital

Diogo Mónica is president and co-founder of Anchorage Digital.

When I moved from Portugal to the United States to work at Square, it was hard to wrap my head around the two-party system that dominates American politics. As I saw at home, democracies, by their very nature, can be messy. But as an outsider looking in, I can’t help but worry that the ever-widening gap between America’s two major parties looms over crypto’s future.

Keep Reading Show less
Diogo Mónica
Diogo Mónica is the co-founder and president of Anchorage Digital, the premier digital asset platform for institutions. He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the Technical University of Lisbon, and has worked in software security for over 15 years. As an early employee at Square, he helped build security architecture that now moves $100 billion annually. At Docker, he helped secure core infrastructure used in global banks, governments and the three largest cloud providers.
Fintech

What downturn? A16z raises $4.5 billion for latest crypto fund

The new fund is more than double the $2.2 billion fund the VC firm raised just last June.

A16z general partner Arianna Simpson said that despite the precipitous drop in crypto prices in recent months, the firm is looking to stay active in the market and isn’t worried about short-term price changes.

Photo: Andreessen Horowitz

Andreessen Horowitz has raised $4.5 billion for two crypto venture funds. They’re the industry’s largest ever and represent an outsized bet on the future of Web3 startups, even with the industry in the midst of a steep market downturn.

The pool of money is technically two separate funds: a $1.5 billion fund for seed deals and a $3 billion fund for broader venture deals. That’s more than other megafunds recently raised by competitors such as Paradigm and Haun Ventures.

Keep Reading Show less
Tomio Geron

Tomio Geron ( @tomiogeron) is a San Francisco-based reporter covering fintech. He was previously a reporter and editor at The Wall Street Journal, covering venture capital and startups. Before that, he worked as a staff writer at Forbes, covering social media and venture capital, and also edited the Midas List of top tech investors. He has also worked at newspapers covering crime, courts, health and other topics. He can be reached at tgeron@protocol.com or tgeron@protonmail.com.

Entertainment

How Amazon built its kid-focused Glow video calling projector

Robots, laser pointers, talking stuffies: Amazon’s devices team went through many iterations while developing its very first interactive projection device.

The Amazon Glow is the first interactive projection device sold by Amazon, and it could be a stepping stone for the company to use the technology in other areas.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Cats love chasing laser pointers. So why not have kids do the same?

When a small team within Amazon’s devices group began exploring the idea of a kid-focused video calling device nearly five years ago, they toyed with a lot of far-out ideas, a laser pointer controlled by an adult calling from afar being one of them. The suggestion was quickly dismissed over eye safety concerns, but it did lead the team down a path exploring projection technologies.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories
Bulletins