The global chip shortage has dragged on for more than a year. When will it finally end?

The shortage of chips needed for everything from cars to fridges has dragged on for more than a year. No one knows for sure when it might end, but experts have many ideas.


The consensus is that the chip shortage will last at least another year.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Click banner image for more holiday coverage for 2021

After more than a year of global shortages, the chip industry has developed an ironic problem: It doesn’t have enough chips to build the machines and tools needed to make the chips the world so desperately needs.

Some of the largest makers of the complex, expensive tools needed to fabricate microprocessors recently began discussing contingency plans if they are unable to get enough chips and other components. Several have had to reduce their financial forecasts or limit their growth estimates for next year, disclosing that shortages of chips and components are the culprits.

Specifically, the chip equipment makers need programmable processors called field-programmable gate arrays, made by the likes of Intel’s Altera unit and Xilinx, among other components. FPGAs tend to be less powerful compared to chips designed for a specific function, but are useful for emerging technology such as 5G infrastructure, certain components inside big data centers and chip-manufacturing machines — where custom chips don’t yet exist.

“Our FPGA chips go into a lot of semiconductor equipment,” Intel's co-general manager of Logic Technology Development Sanjay Natarajan told Protocol. “We will have those discussions with [tool makers], where we say, 'Hey, we want this equipment,' and they go, 'Hey, we want some FPGAs.'”

The fact that there aren’t enough components to allow the chip tools makers to ramp up production is prolonging the shortage, and is just one example of the complexities around both solving it and predicting when it will end. The length of the supply chain, range of materials needed and even unpredictable events — such as a March fire at a Renesas Electronics-owned auto-chip factory in Japan or the extreme cold weather in Texas that triggered factory shutdown — mean all bets are off.

Part of the issue is data. To determine when the tool companies might be able to regain an ample supply of components and chips, industry analysts need more data, according to Syed Alam, global semiconductor lead at Accenture.

“I'm not sure if I have the data point to connect the dots to say X percent of the chip shortage is because of the tools not being available,” Alam told Protocol. “Because a shortage could be for a lot of reasons. You don't have this raw material, you don't have the substrate, you don't have the equipment ready, you don't have the people, you don't have the [factory] build-out done.”

The troubles the equipment makers are facing heading into 2022 are just a piece of a much larger concern. After a big shock to chip manufacturing because of the pandemic, there is also considerably more demand for microchips.

According to Wells Fargo analyst Aaron Rakers and his team’s projections, the semiconductor market could double within five years to $1 trillion, from roughly half that this year.

The pace of transformation in the industry means even high-ranking U.S. officials are reluctant to take a stab at determining when the shortage might end. To help promote a $52 billion government subsidy package to help alleviate the shortage, Deputy Commerce Secretary Don Graves made an appearance at a December chip conference in San Francisco called Semicon West.

But in a telephone interview after the speech, Graves said even he couldn’t forecast the end: “I don’t know that I can give you an accurate prediction on that."

Messy predictions

The 2008 financial crisis may provide some guidance on how long the current shortage will last, according to Deloitte supply chain expert Chris Richard. Back then, tech and consumer electronics companies cut back on orders and burned through their inventory in much the same way automakers and others did in the early months of the pandemic. And when the economy began to recover, orders accelerated as companies tried to rebuild inventory.

“It was well into 2010 before some of our clients and semiconductor companies were back in a normal situation and customers weren’t screaming at them because their [production] line is down,” Richard said.

Discussing the shortage is made more complicated by the fact that there are dozens of types of chips made for markets that range from home appliances — which don’t need very advanced processors — to high-performance computing, which requires the latest silicon. As a result, different industries will operate on different timelines because it might be easier to get some chips more quickly than others.

For example, buyers of data-center chips don’t follow the same patterns as consumers. There may not be enough semiconductors or equipment to satiate demand from large data-center operators such as AWS, Facebook, Google or Microsoft, but those companies typically have tight relationships with the necessary vendors and make capacity plans that account for whatever chips they can get their hands on.

Wall Street analysts and investors often ask chip companies to make predictions because they are attempting to determine when the historically cyclical industry will begin to see supply in line with demand once again, or if they’ll go too far and find themselves with a glut of inventory. If there is an easy consensus among the chip giants, it’s that the shortage will continue through 2022; beyond that is anyone’s guess.

To ease the shortage, Intel has promised to spend $20 billion on two new factories in Arizona, and $3.5 billion to expand capacity at its packaging facility in New Mexico. The company’s executives have long pointed to 2023 as the minimum timeframe for a shortage to ease, in part because of the amount of time it takes to construct new factories and ensure they are up and running.

“But maybe a year and a half total, as you think about how long does it really take to unwind most of these issues and add the necessary capacity in the system,” Intel CFO George Davis said at a recent investor conference. “So I don’t think it’s over quickly. If you're looking at it from a cyclical standpoint, the question is, will we overshoot? Or will we have just what's needed to normalize in 2023?”

Intel rival TSMC is the largest contract chip maker on the planet, and derives a big chunk of its revenue from selling advanced processors found in computers and smartphones fabricated with the latest technology. Executives there are tight-lipped about its current situation, but it has promised $100 billion of capital spending to expand capacity over three years, and on an October call with investors, CEO C.C. Wei gave his version of a prediction.

“Let me say that while we do not rule out the possibility of an inventory correction, we expect TSMC's capacity to remain very tight in 2021 and throughout 2022,” he said. “This is because of our technology leadership position.”

According to Accenture’s Alam, companies started to build more capacity over the past year, which he expects will begin to come online in the next nine to 12 months. In addition, what he described as inflated demand will begin to fall off at around that time; companies have been ordering more chips than they actually need in the hopes they will get the actual quantity necessary to build products.

“I think this double-counting and double-ordering will begin to ease up,” he said. “There will be a correction in terms of the inflated demand.”

The solution

Unfortunately, the industry hasn’t learned much from the prior shortages and cyclical fluctuations, according to Deloitte’s Richard. He said that the industry can do better at dealing with future shortages across the chip supply chain by building in more excess capacity and, if a company is reliant on chips, holding a greater amount of inventory. They're both costly options.

Solving the over-ordering problem could help too. Because real-time exchange of information between various parts of the supply chain doesn’t exist at the moment, signals from different tiers are often amplified through several intermediaries as they travel from a chip buyer such as Apple to a chip maker such as TSMC. Finding ways to get more accurate signals about true demand could potentially dampen the instinct to order in bulk.

What’s clear is that there has been a significant, if hard to calculate, increase in demand for chips of all shapes and sizes, which the pandemic has pushed forward.

“The importance of semiconductors as a foundational pillar for the accelerated digitization (from enterprise to consumer) will continue in the post-COVID world,” the team at Wells Fargo wrote. “From the way we consume goods and services to the way we work (virtually; hybrid), and increasingly the vehicles we drive, we think the COVID pandemic and supply chain constrained recovery will continue.”

According to Graves, part of the rationale behind the Commerce Department’s interest is that the industry is made up of hundreds of companies focused on turning a profit, and it doesn’t spend much time thinking about a national perspective that includes economic and national security. Beyond cash, the federal government can use other mechanisms to ensure there is sufficient talent to run the new chip factories in the coming years and decades.

“We need to make sure that our workforce development system, our community colleges or universities, are putting out the type of talent that’s needed for the upcoming years and decades,” Graves said. “It’s certainly the Ph.D.s at the cutting edge, but it’s also the engineers or the trained technicians up and down the supply chain.”


The (gaming) clones never stopped attacking

Clones keep getting through app review despite App Store rules about copying. It's a sign of the weaknesses in mobile app stores — and the weakness in Big Tech’s after-the-fact moderation approach.

Clones aren't always illegal, but they are widely despised.

Image: Disney

Two of the most fundamental tenets of the mobile gaming market:

  1. Free always wins.
  2. No good gaming idea is safe from copycats.

In combination, these two rules help produce what the industry calls a clone. Most often, clones are low-effort, ripped-off versions of popular games that monetize in not-so-savory fashion while drawing in players with a price tag of zero.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.
Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.

Beat Saber, Bored Apes and more: What to do this weekend

Don't know what to do this weekend? We've got you covered.

Images: Ross Belot/Flickr; IGBD; BAYC

This week we’re listening to “Harvest Moon” on repeat; burning some calories playing Beat Saber; and learning all about the artist behind the goofy ape pics that everyone (including Gwyneth Paltrow?) is talking about.

Neil Young: Off Spotify? No problem.

Neil Young removed his music from Spotify this week, but countless recordings are still available on YouTube, including this 1971 video of him performing “Heart of Gold” in front of a live studio audience, complete with some charming impromptu banter. And while you’re there, scroll down and read a few of the top-rated comments. I promise you won’t be disappointed.

'Archive 81': Not based on a book, but on a podcast!

Netflix’s latest hit show is a supernatural mystery horror mini-series, and I have to admit that I was on the fence about it many times, in part because the plot just often didn’t add up. But then the main character, Dan the film buff and archivist, would put on his gloves, get in the zone, and meticulously restore a severely damaged, decades old video tape, and proceed to look for some meaning beyond the images. That ritual, and the sentiment that we produce, consume and collect media for something more than meets the eye, ultimately saved the show, despite some shortcomings.

'Secrets of Sulphur Springs': Season 2 is out now

If you’re looking for a mystery that's a little more family-friendly, give this show about a haunted hotel, time travel, and kids growing up in a world that their parents don’t fully understand a try. Season 2 dropped on Disney+ this month, and it not only includes a lot more time travel mysteries, but even uses the show’s time machine to tackle subjects as serious as reparations.

The artist behind those Bored Apes

Remember how NFTs are supposed to generate royalties with every resale, and thus support artists better than any of their existing revenue streams? Seneca, the artist who was instrumental in creating those iconic apes for the Bored Ape Yacht Club, wasn’t able to share details about her compensation in this Rolling Stone profile, but it sure sounds like she is not getting her fair share.

Beat Saber: Update incoming

Years later, Beat Saber remains my favorite VR game, which is why I was very excited to see a teaser video for cascading blocks, which could be arriving any day now. Time to bust out the Quest for some practice time this weekend!

Correction: Story has been updated to correct the spelling of Gwyneth Paltrow's name. This story was updated Jan. 28, 2022.

Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Mental health at work is still taboo. Here's how to make it easier.

Tech leaders, HR experts and organizational psychologists share tips for how to destigmatize mental health at work.

How to de-stigmatize mental health at work, according to experts.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

When the pandemic started, HR software startup Phenom knew that its employees were going to need mental health support. So it started offering a meditation program, as well as a counselor available for therapy sessions.

To Chief People Officer Brad Goldoor’s surprise, utilization of these benefits was very low, starting at about a 10% take rate and eventually weaning off. His diagnosis: People still aren’t fully comfortable opening up about mental health, and they’re especially not comfortable engaging with their employer on the topic.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.


Robinhood's regulatory troubles are just the tip of the iceberg

It’s easiest to blame Robinhood’s troubles on regulatory fallout, but its those troubles have obscured the larger issue: The company lacks an enduring competitive edge.

A crypto comeback might go a long way to help Robinhood’s revenue

Image: Olena Panasovska / Alex Muravev / Protocol

It’s been a full year since Robinhood weathered the memestock storm, and the company is now in much worse shape than many of us would have guessed back in January 2021. After announcing its Q4 earnings last night, Robinhood’s stock plunged into the single digits — just below $10 — down from a recent high of $70 in August 2021. That means Robinhood’s valuation dropped more than 84% in less than six months.

Investor confidence won’t be bolstered much by yesterday’s earnings results. Total net revenues dropped to $363 million from $365 million in the preceding quarter. In the quarter before that, Robinhood reported a much better $565 million in net revenue. Net losses were bad but not quite as bad as before: Robinhood reported a $423 million net loss in Q4, an improvement from the $1.3 billion net loss in Q3 2021. One of the most shocking data points: Average revenue per user dropped to $64, down from a recent high of $137 in Q1 2021. At the same time, Robinhood actually reported a decrease in monthly active users, from 18.9 million in Q3 2021 to 17.3 million in Q4 2021.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Latest Stories