Investors discount Wish after share price falls in market debut​

"If we're up and down the same day, it doesn't matter," Wish CFO Rajat Bahri said.

Investors discount Wish after share price falls in market debut​

Wish lacked the "pop" a lot of companies like to see.

Photo: Gabby Jones/Getty Images

The craziness of the Airbnb and DoorDash IPOs scared off at least one company from going public, but ecommerce startup Wish wasn't deterred. Instead, the company priced its share at the high end of its range at $24, raising $1.1 billion for the company in its IPO and bumping its valuation up from $11 billion to $17 billion.

But unlike Airbnb and DoorDash, which saw their shares nearly double as they started trading, Wish lacked the "pop" a lot of companies like to see. Shares for Wish ended up opening lower than its IPO price at $22.75, and continued to fall in trading before closing at $20.05, down over 16% from its pricing — a tech IPO more reminiscent of last year's disappointing Uber IPO than the exuberance of last week's debuts.

"Markets tend to be volatile. We got to a great place," Wish's CFO, Rajat Bahri, told Protocol. "If we're up and down the same day, it doesn't matter. It's a long-term journey and as long as we execute and get to our vision, then the markets will reward us for that."

Part of the challenge is selling investors on Wish's long-term vision and the belief in a shopping platform that's focused on value and not brand-name items. The company counts over 100 million monthly active users, but Bahri said Wish's focus on providing that value to its target audience is one of the most misunderstood things about the company, since its investor base is coming from the top 10% of the country and Wish's market is targeting the bottom 50%.

"Our investors tend to be more brand conscious and more focused on high price value," he said. "So for them to appreciate what the bottom half of the world lives like and what their needs are, that's where we had to do a lot of education in saying how big that market is, how it's been underserved by traditional ecommerce companies and how we are providing such a great experience for these folks who in the absence of our platform will not be able to buy these types of product."

Much of Wish's value proposition is derived from its supply chain, which is concentrated in China. That ended up being an extra challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic when Wish faced a lot of supply issues, even ahead of the pandemic spreading to markets like the U.S. "The air flights were shut down, and all our products come in the underbelly of planes," Bahri said. "We had some supply chain things that were unique to us."

Still, Wish was able to grow at a faster rate in 2020 than it had seen in 2019. Revenue in the first nine months of 2020 reached $1.75 billion, up 32% from $1.33 billion during the same period last year. But revenue in between 2018 and 2019 only grew 10%. Now Wish's challenge is convincing investors that its stock is not something to be discounted, too.

"There is a big market out there, and I feel that the next billion people who will start shopping online will be these value conscious consumers all over the world, whether it's South America, whether it's Africa, whether it's Eastern Europe, and we are perfectly suited for those kinds of value-conscious consumers," Bahri said.


Why Google Cloud is providing security for AWS and Azure users too

“To just focus on Google Cloud, we wouldn't be serving our customers,” Google Cloud security chief Phil Venables told Protocol.

Google Cloud announced the newest addition to its menu of security offerings.

Photo: G/Unsplash

In August, Google Cloud pledged to invest $10 billion over five years in cybersecurity — a target that looks like it will be easily achieved, thanks to the $5.4 billion deal to acquire Mandiant and reported $500 million acquisition of Siemplify in the first few months of 2022 alone.

But the moves raise questions about Google Cloud’s main goal for its security operation. Does Google want to offer the most secure cloud platform in order to inspire more businesses to run on it — or build a major enterprise cybersecurity products and services business, in whatever environment it’s chosen?

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less

The tools that make you pay for not getting stuff done

Some tools let you put your money on the line for productivity. Should you bite?

Commitment contracts are popular in a niche corner of the internet, and the tools have built up loyal followings of people who find the extra motivation effective.

Photoillustration: Anna Shvets/Pexels; Protocol

Danny Reeves, CEO and co-founder of Beeminder, is used to defending his product.

“When people first hear about it, they’re kind of appalled,” Reeves said. “Making money off of people’s failure is how they view it.”

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at

Elon Musk has bots on his mind.

Photo: Christian Marquardt/Getty Images

Elon Musk says he needs proof that less than 5% of Twitter's users are bots — or the deal isn't going ahead.

Keep Reading Show less
Jamie Condliffe

Jamie Condliffe ( @jme_c) is the executive editor at Protocol, based in London. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, he worked on the business desk at The New York Times, where he edited the DealBook newsletter and wrote Bits, the weekly tech newsletter. He has previously worked at MIT Technology Review, Gizmodo, and New Scientist, and has held lectureships at the University of Oxford and Imperial College London. He also holds a doctorate in engineering from the University of Oxford.


Nobody will help Big Tech prevent online terrorism but itself

There’s no will in Congress or the C-suites of social media giants for a new approach, but smaller platforms would have room to step up — if they decided to.

Timothy Kujawski of Buffalo lights candles at a makeshift memorial as people gather at the scene of a mass shooting at Tops Friendly Market at Jefferson Avenue and Riley Street on Sunday, May 15, 2022 in Buffalo, NY. The fatal shooting of 10 people at a grocery store in a historically Black neighborhood of Buffalo by a young white gunman is being investigated as a hate crime and an act of racially motivated violent extremism, according to federal officials.

Photo: Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

The shooting in Buffalo, New York, that killed 10 people over the weekend has put the spotlight back on social media companies. Some of the attack was livestreamed, beginning on Amazon-owned Twitch, and the alleged shooter appears to have written about how his racist motivations arose from misinformation on smaller or fringe sites including 4chan.

In response, policymakers are directing their anger at tech platforms, with New York Governor Kathy Hochul calling for the companies to be “more vigilant in monitoring” and for “a legal responsibility to ensure that such hate cannot populate these sites.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories