Workplace

Four-day weeks, async work, and the office as the new offsite: How 2021 changed the way we work forever

Work changed in 2020 because it had to. Work changed in 2021 because people realized that it can.

Chairs at a conference table

The past calendar year, not 2020, arguably did more to reshape the workplace.

Photo: Brusk Dede/Unsplash

Click banner image for more holiday coverage for 2021

It’s February 2020: COVID-19 is starting to spread from China to Europe and Asia, forcing companies to send workers home. It will only take a few weeks before the virus hits Silicon Valley and forever changes the workplace.

But at least when it came to work in 2020, companies were all in it together. Now, not so much.

Switching to remote work was intimidating, but it was a relatively easy decision given that everyone except frontline workers needed to do it. Plus, people generally knew very little about the virus and how it spread, and vaccines were still far in the future. The workplace changed in 2020 because it needed to; now, the workplace is changing because people realized that it can.

Many employees are working remotely not only because it’s safer; but also because it’s convenient and less distracting. And now companies are rethinking the workweek, the growing role of HR, flexible PTO, the importance of inclusivity at work and many, many other issues.

The past calendar year, not 2020, arguably did more to reshape the workplace. Here’s a look at some of the biggest questions organizations are now weighing, why they've become a debate and where experts think the workplace is heading in the new year.

Remote work is here to stay. What are you going to do about it?

That’s a question for execs, but if we’re being honest, employees and the ongoing pandemic seem to be making the call.

Aside from the barrage of office reopening delays, companies are slowly coming to terms with the fact that the office now serves a different purpose. On one hand, the COVID-19 crisis isn’t going anywhere soon, forcing companies like Google and Microsoft to push back their return-to-office plans indefinitely. On the other hand, top talent is choosing to stay at home even if there’s an office to go to. The office is for getting together and building culture, not necessarily for getting stuff done.

The future of work boils down to creating a “ digital headquarters” with online tools meant for collaboration, not a back-to-office plan, according to Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield. For other companies, like Gusto, it means letting workers decide where they work. Danielle Brown, Gusto's chief people officer, said employees can spend time both in the office and at home, they can work entirely in the office or they can work fully remote.

“We knew we weren’t going to go back to the way things were pre-pandemic where we were primarily in office every single day,” Brown told Protocol. “As we were talking to employees, we asked employees, ‘What is it you want? What is the thing that’s going to work best for you?'”

Employees have got the power. Are you listening to them?

Whether they’re advocating for internal change or protesting back-to-work plans, workers now have a lot of sway. Naturally, HR departments are getting bigger and more involved in decisions ranging from pandemic protocol to retention efforts.

Patricia Mathews, a consultant at Workplace Experts, said the role of HR professionals is now taken much more seriously than before the pandemic. “I have seen the caliber of HR professionals grow from someone who can move papers to, ‘Let's have someone who can be part of the leadership organization.’” The reason for that change boils down to the relationship between the employee and employer: It’s not one-sided anymore.

Over the past year, companies have grown their HR departments with new roles like head of Remote, a role GitLab has hired and Gusto is looking for. Gusto’s Brown said the position helps the company consider building an equitable workplace for people working remotely, in the office, across time zones and from different sites.

“It’s not going to be equal, it’s not going to be the same, but it’s going to be equally successful, equally engaging, equally rewarding and equally fun,” Brown said. One way the company has tried to place employees on an equal playing field is by reworking benefits: Employees previously received a travel stipend to celebrate their first year with the company, but they can now use the stipend for any purpose, like a spa day or different adventure.

On an administrative level, HR leaders are more recognized than ever before. But sometimes, employees don’t even look to execs for change. When there’s strength in numbers, employees have pushed for everything from more transparency in salaries to better protocols for handling workplace bullying and harassment. Companies are paying attention to those conversations, but at the end of the day, some employees don’t just want their own workplaces to change; they want to shift the whole tech industry toward a different way of working.

The workweek will never be the same. How are employees getting their jobs done?

Everyone loves a good long weekend, and for a while, it was a special treat. But companies have increasingly realized they can get their workweek done in less time.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, only a few companies had a four-day workweek. But the number of companies implementing a shorter workweek took off over the past couple of years. Joe Ryle, a campaign officer at 4 Day Week, told Protocol back in August that switching to remote work helped propel the four-day workweek. “People are now realizing that [five-day workweeks are] not the way we should be living our lives."

Other companies like GitLab and Calendly have talked about asynchronous work, where meetings are pre-recorded and employees get time for deep work. The idea of async work coincides with the logic behind the four-day workweek; if employees are trusted to get their jobs done with focused, uninterrupted time, maybe 40-hour workweeks aren’t necessary after all.

Sahil Lavingia, the founder of digital marketplace Gumroad, said the model reduces stress and allows people to build work around their lives, “not the other way around.” He tweeted: “It's a very low stress environment. Many of us don't even have Slack installed. Yet, we're shipping the best software we've ever shipped, and growing faster than ever. Funny how that works!”

Climate

Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Wednesday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.
Fintech

Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Policy

How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.
Latest Stories
Bulletins