'Trust isn't built by just one policy.' Abortion care rights in the workplace are complicated

A growing number of tech companies are extending abortion-related travel benefits. Given privacy and legal fears, will employees be too scared to use them?

Frustrated person at computer

How employers can implement and discuss reproductive benefits in a way that puts employees at ease.

Photo: Sigrid Gombert via Getty Images

It’s about to be a lot harder to get an abortion in the United States. For many, it’s already hard. The result is that employers, including large companies, are being called upon to fill the abortion care gap. The likelihood of a Roe v. Wade reversal was the push some needed to extend benefits, with Microsoft and Tesla announcing abortion-related travel reimbursements in recent weeks. But the privacy and legal risks facing people in need of abortions loom large. If people have reason to fear texting friends for abortion resources, will they really want to confide in their company?

An employee doesn’t have “much to worry about” when it comes to health privacy, said employee benefits consultant Jessica Du Bois. “The HR director or whoever's in charge of the benefits program is not going to be sharing that information.” Employers have a duty to protect employee health data under HIPAA and a variety of state laws. Companies with self-funded health plans — in other words, most large companies — can see every prescription and service an employee receives. But the data is deidentified.

On the other hand, we’re in uncharted territory. Texas’ “aiding and abetting” clause hints at the sprawling legal impact to come if Roe is overturned. Bad actors might be inspired to hack databases to reap rewards for enforcing abortion restrictions. Uber or Lyft drivers could be implicated for unintentionally driving someone to an abortion appointment. Facebook or Google might be pressured to hand over user data. Could a prosecutor subpoena companies for abortion-related medical records to support an “aiding and abetting” case?

“Once you criminalize the activity, it opens up so much more leeway for law enforcement and prosecutors to launch investigations,” said Alejandra Caraballo, clinical instructor at Harvard Law School’s Cyberlaw Clinic. “Especially in states like Louisiana and others where they classify abortion as homicide.”

Catherine Fisk, a professor at Berkeley Law, said it’s unclear if employee health data would be subpoena-able in this instance. She thinks it would be hard for a prosecutor to argue.

“I suspect there will be real challenges in enforcing a subpoena over the objection of a company (or an employee) who maintains that the information as to an employee’s medical condition and treatment is protected from subpoena by both federal law and the law of the state where the treatment was provided, and concerned a medical procedure that was legal in the state where the procedure was performed,” Fisk told Protocol.

Regardless of the legal risk, workers might feel nervous about disclosing abortion needs due to company culture. They might face backlash from co-workers and supervisors who find out. Caraballo drew a link to gender affirming care, another form of health care that’s stigmatized. If an employee’s abortion-related medical claims are denied or inhibited in some way, they might hesitate to speak up. Caraballo said she’s seen this happen with trans employees.

“They don't want to bring it up with their employers because they're concerned it would either out them or would make them seem problematic and then therefore put a target on them by management,” Caraballo said.

Employees might also balk at the subtle ways their abortion care comes out in the workplace. A supervisor might ask to know why they need time off, or where they’re going. If abortion becomes limited to just a few states, quick trips might be viewed with suspicion. “There may be all kinds of issues within workplace culture,” Caraballo said.

While employers have little control over the legal risks, they can implement and discuss benefits in a way that puts employees at ease. Alina Vandenberghe, CEO of scheduling app Chili Piper, said trust isn’t built by just one policy. It’s built by consistently speaking up or taking action when employees are marginalized by laws or other social forces.

“It has to be a strategy in which employees feel they’re being taken care of in many ways and similar situations,” Vandenberghe said.

Chili Piper is reimbursing employees’ temporary relocation or travel costs for reproductive and gender-affirming health care, and offering four weeks of paid personal leave to anyone who needs to travel out of state for this care. Employees go directly to Chili Piper for reimbursement, not through their insurance provider. Vandenberghe said employees don’t have to disclose the exact service when requesting reimbursement. But she acknowledged that Chili Piper is still working out the privacy logistics, as it is a “deeply personal matter.”

Match Group has gone a different route, with CEO Shar Dubey setting up an outside fund for employees. The fund has partnered with Planned Parenthood Los Angeles, which will handle requests and travel arrangements from Match Group employees based in Texas. No one in Match Group will see this data, according to spokesperson Maggie Gillespie. Lyft and Yelp clarified to Protocol that they won’t see medical travel claims as the benefit is through their insurance.

Other companies — including Amazon, Apple and Tesla — Protocol reached out to didn’t detail exactly how they’re handling conversations around and implementation of their abortion travel benefits. Many, like DoorDash, are likely still working out the details. To ensure employees actually feel comfortable taking advantage of the benefit, Du Bois recommends eliminating barriers like prior authorizations. And keeping an eye on legislation. She doesn’t want employees to worry about accessing offered health benefits. For many people, accessing abortions via employer benefits will likely be the only safe option.

“We get scared of people having data, especially our employers,” Du Bois said. “Sometimes we have to see it as a positive thing, because them understanding that information allows them to make policy changes and implement benefits that help their workforce.”


Why chip companies need the college students dazzled by software jobs

New chip fabricating plants will need tens of thousands of skilled workers who don’t currently exist. Training them means persuading students to look away from jobs at big tech companies.

Intel employees in clean room "bunny suits" work at Intel's D1X factory in Hillsboro, Oregon.

Photo: Intel Corporation

Every morning, Isaiah Morris drives his white Nissan Altima eight miles down Arizona state Route 101 to a sprawling, low-level office park in South Tempe. Inside one of the unassuming buildings adjacent to GoDaddy’s headquarters and a couple of Amazon offices, the Arizona State University student dons a lab coat, safety shoes and prescription goggles as he helps engineer chemicals for a chip manufacturing process called planarization.

Morris is an unusual 21-year-old. When they graduate college, many of his tech-minded peers will opt to work for the likes of Apple, Google and other household names that have enjoyed meteoric growth over the last decade. Jobs at those tech companies symbolize prestige for graduates and their parents in a way that careers with chipmakers like Intel do not.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email:, where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

Businesses are evolving, with current events and competition serving as the catalysts for technology adoption. Events from the pandemic to the ongoing war in Ukraine have exposed the fragility of global supply chains. The topic of sustainability is now on every board room agenda. Industries from manufacturing to retail and everything in between are exploring the latest innovations like process automation, machine learning and AI to identify potential safeguards against future disruption. But according to a recent survey from Boston Consulting Group, while 80% of companies are adopting digital solutions to navigate existing business challenges or opportunities like the ones mentioned, only about 30% successfully digitally transform their business.

For the last 50 years, SAP has worked closely with our customers to solve some of the world’s most intricate problems. We have also seen, and have been a part of, rapid accelerations in technology in response. Across industries, certain paths have emerged to help businesses manage the unexpected challenges over the last few years.

Keep Reading Show less
DJ Paoni

DJ Paoni is the President of SAP North America and is responsible for the strategy, day-to-day operations, and overall customer success in the United States and Canada. Dedicated to helping customers become best-run businesses, DJ has established himself as a trusted advisor who places a high priority on their success. He works with many of SAP North America's 155,000 customers and helps them adopt business and technology best practices across 25 different industries.


A new UK visa could steal your top tech talent

Without meaningful immigration reform, U.S.-trained foreign graduates could head across the pond.

The U.S. immigration system turns away hundreds of thousands of highly skilled tech workers every year.

Photo: Ben Fathers/AFP via Getty Images

Almost as soon as he took office, President Biden began the work of undoing a lot of the damage the Trump administration did to the U.S. H-1B visa program. He allowed a Trump-era ban on entry by H-1B holders to expire and withdrew a Trump proposal to prohibit H-1B visa holders’ spouses from working in the U.S. More recently, his administration has expanded the number of degrees considered eligible for special STEM OPT visas.

But the U.S. immigration system still turns away hundreds of thousands of highly skilled — and in many cases U.S.-educated — tech workers every year. Now the U.K. is trying to capitalize on the United States’ failure to reform its policy regarding high-skilled immigrants with a new visa that could poach American-trained tech talent across the pond. And there’s good reason to believe it could work.

Keep Reading Show less
Kwasi Gyamfi Asiedu
Kwasi (kway-see) is a fellow at Protocol with an interest in tech policy and climate. Previously, he covered global religion news at the Associated Press in New York. Before that, he was a freelance journalist based out of Accra, Ghana, covering social justice, health, and environment stories. His reporting has been published in The New York Times, Quartz, CNN, The Guardian, and Public Radio International. He can be reached at

A new regulator is stepping into the 'rent-a-bank' ring

The CFPB is promising a "close look" at controversial lending partnerships between banks and fintechs.

Rent-a-bank lending for personal loans is getting regulatory attention.

Photo: Attentie Attentie/Unsplash

Consumer groups pushing for banking regulators to crack down on so-called rent-a-bank lending for personal loans may have found a willing watchdog.

Zixta Martinez, deputy director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, said at a recent consumer group conference that the agency is taking a "close look" at the lending partnerships between banks and nonbanks, which are often fintech companies.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at

Why Thomas Kurian thinks cloud computing is on the brink of a new era

Kurian tapped his enterprise experience from 22 years at Oracle to reshape Google Cloud as an open, hybrid and multicloud player. What comes next?

Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian spoke with Protocol.

Photo courtesy of Google/Weinberg-Clark Photography

When Thomas Kurian landed the CEO role at Google Cloud, he was welcomed as a respected technologist and executive bringing 22 years of needed enterprise chops from Oracle for a substantial undertaking: turning an underdog into a heavyweight contender for meeting major corporations’ cloud needs.

At the Google Cloud Next conference in early 2019, Alphabet and Google CEO Sundar Pichai introduced Kurian, then about three months into his tenure, as a “tremendous leader with a powerful vision” who already had met with hundreds of customers and partners and whose “personal productivity is testing the limits of G Suite and Calendar.”

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Latest Stories