There’s still bias in e-signatures

According to Adobe, women spend 27 more minutes chasing down signatures compared to men.

Emoji hand signing Adobe logo on a signature line

Adobe’s November “Culture of Contracts” research looks at the social practices behind e-signatures, touching particularly on equity in digital interactions.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

At her old job as a manufacturing company’s in-house counsel Marche Robinson would spend hours chasing down signatures. These were the pre-COVID days, when digital signatures were not yet a necessity. “Everything was wet ink,” Robinson said. Even for an executive based in Asia Pacific.

But it wasn’t just paper slowing the process down. Robinson’s company was very white and male. As a Black woman, she often faced disrespectful comments. “There were times people would question me, like ‘why are you asking me to get a signature? You’re not the secretary?'” Robinson said. “There’s a lack of power you feel asking for a signature.”

Contracts and signatures make up a massive portion of work in a wide array of industries: sales, medicine, law, you name it. The pandemic forced everyone away from the skepticism digital signatures once faced, leading to massive sales growth for DocuSign and Adobe. The convenience and accessibility of digital paperwork makes the alternative unthinkable. “I was at Adobe when we first acquired our signature solution,” said Lisa Croft, director of Digital Media at Adobe. “It used to take weeks to get signatures. Now we’re talking about days, or minutes.”

The practices and culture around document signing haven’t gone away with the move to digital. Even with rapid-fire, online interactions, there’s room for bias and exclusionary language. The good news, Croft says, is that a flexible, digital format is easier to improve upon. Adobe’s November “Culture of Contracts” research looks at the social practices behind e-signatures, touching particularly on equity in digital interactions. “We're helping our customers understand that, when someone's looking at a digital agreement, there are things that you can do to make that easier,” said Croft. Adobe also hopes to use the research to address pain points in its products.

The study polled 1,400 enterprise workers across the U.S., U.K. and Australia on their digital contract habits. The company sought to answer questions about inclusive contract language, time spent reading and signing documents and attitudes on digital versus wet-ink contracts. Unsurprisingly, the majority of workers surveyed would prefer to sign agreements digitally post-COVID (whenever we get there). It makes their lives easier.

One concerning finding that resonated with Robinson is the disparity between women and men, and POC and white people, when it comes to securing signatures. Adobe found that it takes women and employees of color longer to secure signatures from people, with women at 27 more minutes than men, and employees of color at six more minutes than white employees. “That’s a big gap,” Croft said. “It doesn’t seem like a lot but it is when you look at the progress we’ve made [in cutting down signature time].”

Employees of color also spend a longer time reviewing and signing agreements than their white counterparts, the study found. “That’s more just reflective of people of color in corporate America,” Robinson said, rather than data specific to digital agreements. She personally spent a lot of time reviewing contracts to avoid making mistakes, as she faced the added pressure of being the only Black attorney and the youngest attorney in the firm. Generally, Robinson found that men’s responses to signature requests were “oh yeah whatever, I’ll sign it,” while women asked more questions.

More than one in three respondents noticed gender-binary language in contracts, and 25% noted limited options to describe their identities. In its blog post, Adobe gave suggestions for the kinds of language companies should consider when writing up contracts. But ultimately, those decisions have to be made on a case-by-case basis. Some employees might prefer the term “person with a disability;” some might prefer “disabled person.” Polling employees is important.

Accessibility, of course, should be top of mind when it comes to digital contracts. It should be top of mind when it comes to the whole internet, as the pandemic has made increasingly clear. “I worked in government, I know accessibility well,” Croft said. “It was always a government problem. That's not the case anymore. Accessibility is everyone's problem.” Andrew Kirkpatrick, Adobe’s head of Accessibility, said the company’s always looking to make its products more inclusive, like allowing more text customization through Adobe Acrobat’s liquid mode.

Adobe also recently released a report on workplace accessibility for employees with disabilities, surveying 1,000 people across the country. The study made it clear that workers want accessibility baked into all aspects of work, with 77% of respondents interested in more education on the issue. “Creativity runs really deep within people who identify as disabled,” said Rani Mani, head of Employee Advocacy at Adobe. “We’ve had to come up with a ton of life hacks to orchestrate our life and being.”

We’re still navigating the mostly digital workplace and all the ways normal processes, like contract-signing, have changed. Digital contracts solve for convenience, but they’re not immune to bias and exclusion. Still, Robinson thinks the prevalence of digital contracts is cause for optimism. She’s now working full time as a content creator and almost all of her contracts are digital (some brands, stuck in the ‘90s, make her print out contracts to send).

“You feel more comfortable sending a contract to a signatory,” Robinson said. “There’s no, oh I have to go face-to-face with you and chase you down. I think it will level the playing field in corporate America to move to digital.”


Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.

How I decided to exit my startup’s original business

Bluevine got its start in factoring invoices for small businesses. CEO Eyal Lifshitz explains why it dropped that business in favor of “end-to-end banking.”

"[I]t was a realization that we can't be successful at both at the same time: You've got to choose."

Photo: Bluevine

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Bluevine got its start in fintech by offering a modern version of invoice factoring, the centuries-old practice where businesses sell off their accounts receivable for up-front cash. It’s raised $240 million in venture capital and about $700 million in total financing since its founding in 2013 by serving small businesses. But along the way, it realized it was better to focus on the checking accounts and lines of credit it provided customers than its original product. It now manages some $500 million in checking-account deposits.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at
Latest Stories