Workplace

Employees are leaving because they feel ignored

Dave MacLeod, the CEO and co-founder of ThoughtExchange, shared how leaders can gain better feedback from all their employees.

Frustrated person at a laptop.

Executives have spent the past two years listening, and workers have spent the last two years talking, but what comes next?

Photo: Elisa Ventur via Unsplash

Executives have spent the past two years listening, and workers have spent the last two years talking, but what comes next?

Companies launched surveys, forums and off-the-record round-table conversations about topics varying from race and safety to public health and burnout, but the resulting action has been harder to track. Employees are understandably frustrated with leaders for not responding to their solicited feedback, and frankly it seems like a lot of leaders are overwhelmed.

Protocol reached out to Dave MacLeod, the CEO and co-founder of ThoughtExchange, to find out how to have an effective conversation with employees and what comes after leaders have asked all the questions.

ThoughtExchange is an enterprise tool that enables employers to solicit anonymous feedback from employees through open-ended questions. The goal is to help leaders make quicker unbiased decisions. MacLeod spoke with Protocol about the trends he’s seen in the questions leaders are asking and what action he thinks should come next to get employees to stick around.

This interview has been edited for both brevity and clarity.

Walk me through it — an executive comes to ThoughtExchange and wants to get some data or some insight from their employees. What trends are you seeing right now in terms of what they're coming to you for?

They're trying to move past the modality of … just sending open-ended surveys. We're trying to evolve that into a collective intelligence conversation with the enterprise and I think technology has the promise that you can converse with 1000 people. And it doesn't mean just you talk, or just they talk, it's actually a back-and-forth, mutually beneficial interaction.

So what’s going wrong in the way companies are soliciting feedback and listening to employees right now?

I think listening means hearing things, but also means taking action. There's this huge report that came out that said people are leaving [companies] because of feedback that goes unheard. I actually think that's bullshit, because I think everyone's like, “No, no, you heard me, you just ignored me.” That's different.

I think that either you didn’t A) take action, or B) explain why you didn't take action in a way that satisfied [employees]. And I think that's the place where most businesses are falling over right now. They’re hearing, they have troves of data, open-ended survey stuff, but it's not organized in such a way that they can either take action or describe to you why [they didn’t take action].

People are leaving because they feel blatantly ignored, not unheard. Because everybody's tripling down on listening tools right now, but nobody's tripling down on action tools. What are we actually going to do about the fact that we just heard from everybody?

So what’s your favorite question for leaders to ask?

A new leader in a business just asked everyone, “I'm a new leader in the business. What do you want me to know?” It's kind of mind bending, but it's also like, that's a really powerful question. And that's the same thing you'd ask somebody in the hallway. And we just had a global Fortune 50 CEO ask that across 50,000 people: “What do I need to know right now about the business?”

What's the one thing you hope leaders ask more moving forward?

I wish that people would ask for perspectives on their strategy and be more respectful of the fact that anybody that works for the business has value and has the right to answer that question and will provide value in answering it for you. There aren't people that are more strategic than other people. Someone who just started yesterday working in a fast food place, they have an extremely valuable opinion because they work with customers every day. So I think the thing that's happened is that you can ask about what the organization is thinking about doing and you can grant people a right to their voice. There's no CEO in the world that doesn't want to hear from somebody at the edge of the company who just got feedback from a customer trying to make their life happier, so that's actually a strategic conversation.

What do you advise executives do this year to better organize feedback? What are the best practices to make sure employees don’t feel ignored?

They need to find a way to actually figure out what matters, they need tools to aggregate and make sense of those things and to keep your bias out of the process. So that's one, and it's kind of ThoughtExchange-centric. We feel pretty unique in our ability to do that as a brand. But whether it's using ThoughtExchange or their own tools, they have to be able to take what everyone has said and determine what matters within it and not just count responses.

I think we need to as a species [realize] having a conversation, changing our mind, empathizing, learning from each other is our competitive advantage. So how are leaders saying, “Well, hey, we've heard all these things, now how do we make sure we're not just going with the most popular things?” Diversity means respecting all the different points of view, even when people disagree. We're not trying to arrive at some beautiful consensus of the most important thing. We're trying to say we've heard a bunch of different things and we're going to deal with that, even if people don't agree.

Policy

Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Policy

The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories
Bulletins