Workplace

Ask a tech worker: Do you want your company to be political?

Here’s what tech workers think about your most recent blog post.

Two chat bubbles in front of a building.

Is it more of a risk to stay quiet, or to take a stance that might provoke backlash among employees, customers or investors?

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Welcome back to Ask a Tech Worker. For each installment, I head out to the streets of downtown San Francisco to chat with tech employees and entrepreneurs about issues affecting the workplace. Got an idea for a future edition? Email me.

It’s expected at this point: Tech companies — especially big ones — taking a public stance on social and political issues. Between threats to abortion rights, LGBTQ+ issues, the climate crisis, racial justice and the war in Ukraine, there’s no shortage of issues for companies to speak out about, or take action on. At the same time, there’s some interest in the tech world in being less political about issues that don’t directly serve the company’s mission.

But what do workers actually expect from their companies here? Is it more of a risk to stay quiet, or to take a stance that might provoke backlash among employees, customers or investors? I returned to Salesforce Park last week to ask workers when they want their employers to speak out, when they want them to step back — and when it all just looks like a PR stunt.

What I found: The workers I met had few reservations about their employers taking a stand on social and political issues, leaning toward wanting them to speak out. But they notice when companies hesitate, when they sound phony and when their statement is watered down to the point that no one could ever disagree with it.

“All these companies have accrued vastly disproportionate amounts of power, and along with that comes some sort of social responsibility to the communities that we exist within,” said software engineer Dan Spaeth of X, Alphabet’s so-called “moonshot factory.” “It’s definitely something to be wielded cautiously because when you have that power, making those statements is a form of exercising it.”

Sanika Doolani, a product designer at Salesforce, said she usually likes when companies speak out, offering the war in Ukraine as an example of a high-impact issue that some companies have been vocal about.

“When I see companies speaking about all these things, it feels like we are all in it together,” Doolani said.

And when companies wait to speak out — or take a stance that proves unpopular — that can provoke action from employees.

Philip, a Salesforce employee who declined to give his last name, pointed to Disney’s initial unwillingness to condemn Florida’s so-called “Don’t Say Gay” law that will ban schools from teaching kids in the third grade and below about sexual orientation and gender identity.

After Disney employees challenged that decision, Disney CEO Bob Chapek flipped and opposed the law. But it was too late by that point, and employees still held a walkout.

Philip applauded the grassroots effort.

“You look at the Disney thing going on right now, and they didn’t make a decision until employees made it a problem,” Philip said. “I feel like, ‘Good job, employees.’ And now they’re getting some backlash [for] it.”

Politics are a minefield, and companies will risk backlash no matter what. So how do you calculate that risk? Spaeth said he’d be more likely to get angry at an employer for not saying anything than for saying something with which he disagreed. He’s watched as past employers put out statements that were “not fully representative of their own situation,” he said, but noted that he hasn’t objected to social and political statements that they’ve made.

As it is, corporate political statements tend to be watered down and “very anodyne,” to the point where the only people who might be upset by them are people who would “get mad at anything,” Spaeth said.

Companies should also avoid phoniness. Many of these statements can come across as PR stunts, workers told me.

“Sometimes, it is a PR stunt,” Philip said. “There are times when they speak out, and I’m like, ‘Oh, is that because of the bottom line, or is it because of actually wanting an outcome that has nothing to do with business?’”

But, Spaeth said, scoring PR points isn’t always a bad thing.

“Whenever these statements are made, they are a PR thing, on some level,” Spaeth said. “That said, I don’t think it’s the worst thing to generate PR in a way that is positive.”

Workplace

An IPO may soon be in Notion’s future

Notion COO Akshay Kothari says there’s room to grow, aided by a new CFO who knows how to take a company public.

Notion has hired its first chief financial officer: Rama Katkar.

Photo: Courtesy of Notion

It’s been a year since Notion’s triumphant $275 million funding round and $10 billion valuation. Since then the landscape for productivity startups trying to make it on their own has completely changed, especially for those pandemic darlings that flourished in the all-remote world.

As recession looms, companies looking to cut costs are less likely to spend money on tools outside of their Microsoft or Google workplace bundles. Enterprise platforms are bulking up and it could spell trouble for the productivity startups trying to unseat them. But Notion COO Akshay Kothari says the company is still aiming to build the next Microsoft, not be the next Microsoft. And in a move signaling a new chapter of maturity, Notion has hired its first chief financial officer: Rama Katkar, Instacart’s former VP of finance.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Securing the Enterprise

Securing the enterprise

There’s no let-up in the surge of cyberattacks against businesses. But shutting down the hackers will require many enterprises to evolve their strategy.

In today’s enterprise, “identity and security are very merged.”

Illustration: iStock/Getty Images Plus; Protocol
the Protocol team
Protocol focuses on the people, power and politics of tech, with no agenda and just one goal: to arm decision-makers in tech, business and public policy with the unbiased, fact-based news and analysis they need to navigate a world in rapid change.
Fintech

How neobanks are helping consumers game credit scoring

The CFPB says it is closely monitoring secured credit cards offered by neobanks.

Regulators are scrutinizing neobanks' card offerings.

Photo: Oscar Wong/Moment/Getty Images

About one in six Americans has a credit score below 619, according to the CFPB. Another 23% have too thin a credit file to score or no file at all. That puts them in a credit trap: To build credit, these consumers need someone to give them a line of credit with which they can demonstrate good financial habits. But with scores that low, few lenders are prepared to offer them anything.

Neobanks say they can solve the problem through a new twist on secured credit cards. But regulators are already scrutinizing their offerings.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

Policy

Steel decided World War II. Chips will decide whatever is next.

“Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology” foreshadows the coming battle between nations over semiconductors.

“Chip War” outlines the nature of the coming battle over semiconductors, showing how the power to produce leading-edge chips fell into the hands of just five companies.

Image: Scribner; Protocol

“World War II was decided by steel and aluminum, and followed shortly thereafter by the Cold War, which was defined by atomic weapons,” Chris Miller, a professor at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, writes in the introduction to his latest book. So what’s next? According to Miller, the next era, including the rivalry between the U.S. and China, is all about computing power.

That tech rivalry and the story of how the chip industry got from four to 11.8 billion transistors are all part of Miller’s book, “Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology,” which comes out Oct. 4. “Chip War” outlines the nature of the coming battle over semiconductors, showing how the power to produce leading-edge chips fell into the hands of just five companies: three from the U.S., one from Japan, and one from the Netherlands.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins