Workplace

Ask a tech worker: Do you want your company to be political?

Here’s what tech workers think about your most recent blog post.

Two chat bubbles in front of a building.

Is it more of a risk to stay quiet, or to take a stance that might provoke backlash among employees, customers or investors?

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Welcome back to Ask a Tech Worker. For each installment, I head out to the streets of downtown San Francisco to chat with tech employees and entrepreneurs about issues affecting the workplace. Got an idea for a future edition? Email me.

It’s expected at this point: Tech companies — especially big ones — taking a public stance on social and political issues. Between threats to abortion rights, LGBTQ+ issues, the climate crisis, racial justice and the war in Ukraine, there’s no shortage of issues for companies to speak out about, or take action on. At the same time, there’s some interest in the tech world in being less political about issues that don’t directly serve the company’s mission.

But what do workers actually expect from their companies here? Is it more of a risk to stay quiet, or to take a stance that might provoke backlash among employees, customers or investors? I returned to Salesforce Park last week to ask workers when they want their employers to speak out, when they want them to step back — and when it all just looks like a PR stunt.

What I found: The workers I met had few reservations about their employers taking a stand on social and political issues, leaning toward wanting them to speak out. But they notice when companies hesitate, when they sound phony and when their statement is watered down to the point that no one could ever disagree with it.

“All these companies have accrued vastly disproportionate amounts of power, and along with that comes some sort of social responsibility to the communities that we exist within,” said software engineer Dan Spaeth of X, Alphabet’s so-called “moonshot factory.” “It’s definitely something to be wielded cautiously because when you have that power, making those statements is a form of exercising it.”

Sanika Doolani, a product designer at Salesforce, said she usually likes when companies speak out, offering the war in Ukraine as an example of a high-impact issue that some companies have been vocal about.

“When I see companies speaking about all these things, it feels like we are all in it together,” Doolani said.

And when companies wait to speak out — or take a stance that proves unpopular — that can provoke action from employees.

Philip, a Salesforce employee who declined to give his last name, pointed to Disney’s initial unwillingness to condemn Florida’s so-called “Don’t Say Gay” law that will ban schools from teaching kids in the third grade and below about sexual orientation and gender identity.

After Disney employees challenged that decision, Disney CEO Bob Chapek flipped and opposed the law. But it was too late by that point, and employees still held a walkout.

Philip applauded the grassroots effort.

“You look at the Disney thing going on right now, and they didn’t make a decision until employees made it a problem,” Philip said. “I feel like, ‘Good job, employees.’ And now they’re getting some backlash [for] it.”

Politics are a minefield, and companies will risk backlash no matter what. So how do you calculate that risk? Spaeth said he’d be more likely to get angry at an employer for not saying anything than for saying something with which he disagreed. He’s watched as past employers put out statements that were “not fully representative of their own situation,” he said, but noted that he hasn’t objected to social and political statements that they’ve made.

As it is, corporate political statements tend to be watered down and “very anodyne,” to the point where the only people who might be upset by them are people who would “get mad at anything,” Spaeth said.

Companies should also avoid phoniness. Many of these statements can come across as PR stunts, workers told me.

“Sometimes, it is a PR stunt,” Philip said. “There are times when they speak out, and I’m like, ‘Oh, is that because of the bottom line, or is it because of actually wanting an outcome that has nothing to do with business?’”

But, Spaeth said, scoring PR points isn’t always a bad thing.

“Whenever these statements are made, they are a PR thing, on some level,” Spaeth said. “That said, I don’t think it’s the worst thing to generate PR in a way that is positive.”

Policy

A new UK visa could steal your top tech talent

Without meaningful immigration reform, U.S.-trained foreign graduates could head across the pond.

The U.S. immigration system turns away hundreds of thousands of highly skilled tech workers every year.

Photo: Ben Fathers/AFP via Getty Images

Almost as soon as he took office, President Biden began the work of undoing a lot of the damage the Trump administration did to the U.S. H-1B visa program. He allowed a Trump-era ban on entry by H-1B holders to expire and withdrew a Trump proposal to prohibit H-1B visa holders’ spouses from working in the U.S. More recently, his administration has expanded the number of degrees considered eligible for special STEM OPT visas.

But the U.S. immigration system still turns away hundreds of thousands of highly skilled — and in many cases U.S.-educated — tech workers every year. Now the U.K. is trying to capitalize on the United States’ failure to reform its policy regarding high-skilled immigrants with a new visa that could poach American-trained tech talent across the pond. And there’s good reason to believe it could work.

Keep Reading Show less
Kwasi Gyamfi Asiedu
Kwasi (kway-see) is a fellow at Protocol with an interest in tech policy and climate. Previously, he covered global religion news at the Associated Press in New York. Before that, he was a freelance journalist based out of Accra, Ghana, covering social justice, health, and environment stories. His reporting has been published in The New York Times, Quartz, CNN, The Guardian, and Public Radio International. He can be reached at kasiedu@protocol.com.

Businesses are evolving, with current events and competition serving as the catalysts for technology adoption. Events from the pandemic to the ongoing war in Ukraine have exposed the fragility of global supply chains. The topic of sustainability is now on every board room agenda. Industries from manufacturing to retail and everything in between are exploring the latest innovations like process automation, machine learning and AI to identify potential safeguards against future disruption. But according to a recent survey from Boston Consulting Group, while 80% of companies are adopting digital solutions to navigate existing business challenges or opportunities like the ones mentioned, only about 30% successfully digitally transform their business.

For the last 50 years, SAP has worked closely with our customers to solve some of the world’s most intricate problems. We have also seen, and have been a part of, rapid accelerations in technology in response. Across industries, certain paths have emerged to help businesses manage the unexpected challenges over the last few years.

Keep Reading Show less
DJ Paoni, President of SAP North America

DJ Paoni is the President of SAP North America and is responsible for the strategy, day-to-day operations, and overall customer success in the United States and Canada. Dedicated to helping customers become best-run businesses, DJ has established himself as a trusted advisor who places a high priority on their success. He works with many of SAP North America's 155,000 customers and helps them adopt business and technology best practices across 25 different industries.

Fintech

A new regulator is stepping into the 'rent-a-bank' ring

The CFPB is promising a "close look" at controversial lending partnerships between banks and fintechs.

Rent-a-bank lending for personal loans is getting regulatory attention.

Photo: Attentie Attentie/Unsplash

Consumer groups pushing for banking regulators to crack down on so-called rent-a-bank lending for personal loans may have found a willing watchdog.

Zixta Martinez, deputy director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, said at a recent consumer group conference that the agency is taking a "close look" at the lending partnerships between banks and nonbanks, which are often fintech companies.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Enterprise

Why Thomas Kurian thinks cloud computing is on the brink of a new era

Kurian tapped his enterprise experience from 22 years at Oracle to reshape Google Cloud as an open, hybrid and multicloud player. What comes next?

Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian spoke with Protocol.

Photo courtesy of Google/Weinberg-Clark Photography

When Thomas Kurian landed the CEO role at Google Cloud, he was welcomed as a respected technologist and executive bringing 22 years of needed enterprise chops from Oracle for a substantial undertaking: turning an underdog into a heavyweight contender for meeting major corporations’ cloud needs.

At the Google Cloud Next conference in early 2019, Alphabet and Google CEO Sundar Pichai introduced Kurian, then about three months into his tenure, as a “tremendous leader with a powerful vision” who already had met with hundreds of customers and partners and whose “personal productivity is testing the limits of G Suite and Calendar.”

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Enterprise

AWS employees say evidence of misconduct hides in plain sight

Such is the reality of today’s corporate environment.

There was hope this report would be the catalyst to institute more systemic change within both ProServe and the whole of AWS.

Image: Henrique Casinhas/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

It’s a tale as old as, well, the last few years. And this month, it’s AWS that got to live it.

The company recently outlined to employees the findings of an external probe conducted by Oppenheimer Investigations Group into a troubled division of the sprawling cloud giant. Known shorthand as ProServe, it’s the unit that helps customers make the most of AWS products.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins