Workplace

Ask a tech worker: How much job-hopping is too much job-hopping?

Aim to stick around longer than a year, but don’t stay too long, tech workers told me.

Two chat bubbles in front of a building: Ask a tech worker image

Tech workers have differing views on job-hopping.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Tech workers have more reason than ever to change jobs these days. In the race for talent, companies are offering more money, expanding already-plush benefits and adding flexibility. Job-hopping has always been part of the culture in Silicon Valley, but the current market is creating even more incentive to jump ship.

But employers — even in tech — still want to hire candidates who can commit and help scale a team or an organization: The cost alone of hiring a new employee can amount to as much as 20% of their annual salary, according to Ideal. And a resume with too many brief stints might raise eyebrows down the line. In this market, are job seekers even worried about it? On a balmy day at Salesforce Park this week, I asked tech workers I met about their views on job-hopping.

Ed Kraay, an agile transformation coach at Salesforce, took a relatively conservative view.

“You need enough relationship-building so that you can get things done,” Kraay said. “If you change your job every year, people look down on that, probably, because you’re not able to really do the things you need to give back.”

Some companies even expect employees to return their sign-on bonus if they leave within a certain period of time.

But there’s also a risk to staying in a job for too long. More than a decade in the same job can bring scrutiny, Kraay said.

“My last job, I was at for eight years, and it felt like almost too much,” Kraay said. That said, there are some situations where such a long tenure can work, like if the company transforms a lot over that period, he noted.

Generational differences play a role here, and the data shows that younger workers tend to job-hop more often. Research from CareerBuilder released in October showed that millennials and Gen Z spend less than three years in each job, on average, compared to five years for Gen X and eight years for Baby Boomers.

Much remains to be seen about Gen Z’s tenure in jobs, since the oldest members of that generation are only in their mid-20s. Some expect this generation to be more risk-averse and cautious about professional expectations than its older counterparts, according to CareerBuilder’s research.

Lee Murdock is still new to the workforce and said she’s changed jobs twice in the last two years. Now an associate program manager at Salesforce, Murdock said employees should stick around for at least a year before moving on.

“I think people should do whatever they want, but as far as career success, [less than a year] is not enough time to really integrate into a team and show results that you can take forward,” Murdock said.

Murdock pointed out that some companies require employees to stay on a team for two years before transferring to a new internal role — a clue about the longevity that employers still expect.

There are always exceptions for great job offers, she said.


“It’s an employee’s market right now, and folks should take advantage of that,” Murdock said.

Research from the Conference Board found that almost a third of professionals who have left their organization since the start of the pandemic now make more than 30% more money.

Gopi Karunamoorthy, finance manager at the ecommerce software maker Recharge Payments, agreed that job seekers should take advantage of the market.

“The longest I’ve ever stayed at a company is two years,” Karunamoorthy said. “Especially in San Francisco, in tech, there’s a lot of opportunity, and if you want to change, you have the right to choose.”

Karunamoorthy said he’s not worried that his record of frequently changing jobs will, at some point, get in the way. Sometimes, it’s hard to know if a job is the right fit before a few months in the role, he said.

“Hopefully, the interview process is good enough that you know what an opportunity’s worth and if it’s right for you, but it’s hard to judge in an hour or two hours,” Karunamoorthy said. “So you find out three months down the line, and go somewhere else.”

Elon Musk's influence over Twitter was clear at its annual meeting

Even though executives tried not to talk about Musk's deal to buy the company, they couldn't help but address his agenda.

Elon Musk loomed over Twitter's annual shareholder meeting.

Photoillustration: Getty Images; Unsplash; Protocol

In his opening remarks at Twitter's annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday, CEO Parag Agrawal said he wouldn't discuss the pending acquisition bid from Elon Musk, which wasn't on the agenda. That didn’t matter much: Musk’s fingerprints were all over the event, even overshadowing the expected if still-emotional news that Jack Dorsey would step away from Twitter’s board at the meeting's conclusion.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.

Workplace

Netflix’s layoffs reveal a larger diversity challenge in tech

Netflix just laid off 150 full-time employees and a number of agency contractors. Many of them were the company’s most marginalized employees.

It quickly became clear that many of the laid-off contractors possessed marginalized identities.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

After Netflix’s first round of layoffs, there was a brief period of relief for the contractors who ran Netflix’s audience-oriented social media channels, like Strong Black Lead, Most and Con Todo. But the calm didn’t last.

Last week, Netflix laid off 150 full-time employees and a number of agency contractors. The customary #opentowork posts flooded LinkedIn, many coming from impacted members of Netflix’s talent and recruiting teams. A number of laid-off social media contractors also took to Twitter to share the news. It quickly became clear that similar to the layoffs at Tudum, Netflix’s entertainment site, many of the affected contractors possessed marginalized identities. The channels they ran focused on Black, LGBTQ+, Latinx and Asian audiences, among others.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Fintech

Crypto doesn’t have to be red or blue

Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand are backing bipartisan legislation that establishes regulatory clarity for cryptocurrencies. This is the right way to approach a foundational technology.

"Crypto doesn’t neatly fall along party lines because, as a foundational technology, it is — or should be — inherently nonpartisan," says Diogo Mónica, co-founder and president of Anchorage Digital.

Photo: Anchorage Digital

Diogo Mónica is president and co-founder of Anchorage Digital.

When I moved from Portugal to the United States to work at Square, it was hard to wrap my head around the two-party system that dominates American politics. As I saw at home, democracies, by their very nature, can be messy. But as an outsider looking in, I can’t help but worry that the ever-widening gap between America’s two major parties looms over crypto’s future.

Keep Reading Show less
Diogo Mónica
Diogo Mónica is the co-founder and president of Anchorage Digital, the premier digital asset platform for institutions. He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the Technical University of Lisbon, and has worked in software security for over 15 years. As an early employee at Square, he helped build security architecture that now moves $100 billion annually. At Docker, he helped secure core infrastructure used in global banks, governments and the three largest cloud providers.
Fintech

What downturn? A16z raises $4.5 billion for latest crypto fund

The new fund is more than double the $2.2 billion fund the VC firm raised just last June.

A16z general partner Arianna Simpson said that despite the precipitous drop in crypto prices in recent months, the firm is looking to stay active in the market and isn’t worried about short-term price changes.

Photo: Andreessen Horowitz

Andreessen Horowitz has raised $4.5 billion for two crypto venture funds. They’re the industry’s largest ever and represent an outsized bet on the future of Web3 startups, even with the industry in the midst of a steep market downturn.

The pool of money is technically two separate funds: a $1.5 billion fund for seed deals and a $3 billion fund for broader venture deals. That’s more than other megafunds recently raised by competitors such as Paradigm and Haun Ventures.

Keep Reading Show less
Tomio Geron

Tomio Geron ( @tomiogeron) is a San Francisco-based reporter covering fintech. He was previously a reporter and editor at The Wall Street Journal, covering venture capital and startups. Before that, he worked as a staff writer at Forbes, covering social media and venture capital, and also edited the Midas List of top tech investors. He has also worked at newspapers covering crime, courts, health and other topics. He can be reached at tgeron@protocol.com or tgeron@protonmail.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins