Tech companies are feeling the pressure to offer more flexibility

Amazon will leave it up to directors to decide whether teams have to come to the office. Will other tech giants follow?

Person at a laptop looking out a window

On Monday Amazon had told its workforce that it didn't necessarily have to return to the office at all, leaving that decision up to team directors.

Photo: Yasmina H/Unsplash

Earlier this year, Amazon was planning to abandon remote work and require its corporate employees to return to the office five days a week.

That's all changed in just a few months. By Monday, the company had reversed course in a big way, telling its workforce that it didn't necessarily have to return to the office at all, leaving that decision up to team directors.

"We're intentionally not prescribing how many days or which days," CEO Andy Jassy wrote in a message to Amazon employees. "We expect that there will be teams that continue working mostly remotely, others that will work some combination of remotely and in the office, and still others that will decide customers are best served having the team work mostly in the office."

Jassy's announcement marks a sea change for Amazon, coming just four months after the company's initial shift toward hybrid.

In June — weeks before Jassy took over as CEO — Amazon told employees they could work remotely twice a week once offices reopened, discarding its initial five-day-a-week in-office plan.

So, not only has Amazon now caught up with the flexibility on offer at other tech giants: By lifting its across-the-board rule that employees have to spend most of their time in the office, Amazon may have just surpassed some of its peers when it comes to accommodating flexible work.

The downside is that Amazon's corporate employees can't rely on a single hard-and-fast rule to know how much they'll have to come into the office: Their work schedules — and lifestyles — are up to the directors who run their teams.

Tech giants still have one-size-fits-all rules

Google, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft still plan to require most employees to come to the office 50% or 60% of the time, a model that has inspired well-publicized pushback at Apple.

Companies generally say they're open to making exceptions.

Any Facebook employee whose job can be performed remotely is allowed to request remote work, the company said in June.

Google leaders told employees in August that the company had approved 85% of around 10,000 employee requests to continue working remotely long-term. Around 20% will work remotely, the company said in May.

And Microsoft states in its Hybrid Workplace Flexibility Guide, which the company shared in a May blog post, that employees can request manager approval to work remotely more than half the time. So far, none of these companies has indicated it would back-track on imposing a default 50% or 60% in-office work schedule.

Microsoft subsidiary LinkedIn, however, has walked back its initial office work mandate. In July, LinkedIn CEO Ryan Roslansky said that the company would move away from its own plan to require employees to work in the office at least half the time, declaring that "we trust each other to do our best work where it works best for us and our teams."

Will other tech giants get more flexible?

For companies as large as Amazon — or Google, Facebook or Apple — leaving remote work planning up to teams may make sense.

"It's more understandable why they would do it team by team, because their teams can be the size of small companies," said Lana Peters, vice president for the Americas at Hibob, an HR software provider.

Plus, companies are under acute pressure from employees who want more flexibility — and can leave for more remote-friendly employers.

Yet executives — the leaders plotting out how their companies will approach hybrid work — are far more interested in returning to the office than employees are, and most admit they aren't including much, or any, direct employee input in their return to office plans, according to a new survey from Slack's Future Forum research initiative.

Only one in three employees wants to come to the office three or more days per week, according to the survey of almost 11,000 knowledge workers in the U.S., U.K., Australia, Germany, France and Japan.

Executives are much more office-happy: 75% want to work from the office three or more days per week, and 44% want to come in every day. Brian Elliott, Future Forum's executive leader, attributed that disparity to old assumptions about in-person collaboration being vital to innovation.

"It requires a mindset shift to say 'I'm going to focus on outcomes as opposed to attendance and presenteeism,'" Elliott told Protocol last month. "There clearly, though, are executives that are still falling back on old tropes, that are still falling back on 'I want to see that my people are showing up.'"


How I decided to go all-in on a federal contract — before assignment

Amanda Renteria knew Code for America could help facilitate access to expanded child tax credits. She also knew there was no guarantee her proof of concept would convince others — but tried anyway.

Code for America CEO Amanda Renteria explained how it's helped people claim the Child Tax Credit.

Photo: Code for America

Click banner image for more How I decided series

After the American Rescue Plan Act passed in March 2021, the U.S. government expanded child tax credits to provide relief for American families during the pandemic. The legislation allowed some families to nearly double their tax benefits per child, which was especially critical for low-income families, who disproportionately bore the financial brunt of the pandemic.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at


Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Latest Stories