This ecommerce company just launched a permanent 4-day workweek

Bolt’s Chief People Officer Jennifer Christie shared how the startup makes it four-day workweek work for employees.

Bolt employees

Bolt permanently instated a four-day workweek for all of its employees.

Photo: Bolt

Over the past year we’ve heard about a myriad of four-day workweek experiments at tech companies. While some experiments lasted for the duration of the summer, others stretched on into the fall. Now, several months later, some companies are keeping the arrangement forever. Ecommerce checkout company Bolt just announced that it will make its four-day workweek a permanent fixture moving forward.

Like many other tech companies, Bolt began by experimenting with the four-day workweek. The company started with a three-month pilot last fall to see what worked and what didn't, and then would decide if they wanted to roll it out permanently. They also surveyed employees after the three months for more thorough feedback. The verdict? The pilot was a success.

94% of Bolt’s employees who answered the survey wanted to keep the shorter workweek, and 91% of managers wanted to continue it, Jennifer Christie, Bolt’s chief people officer, told Protocol. Christie officially joined Bolt in January following a four-year stint at Twitter where she was chief HR officer, though she was part of conversations early on when Bolt was kicking off the pilot.

“Having those conversations with [CEO Ryan Breslow] and the team was one of the big attractions for me to come to Bolt,” said Christie.

The leadership at the startup views the shortened workweek as more of a work culture than a flashy recruiting incentive, said Christie, and they’ve worked to put managers and leaders in place who support working in a similar way (after all, the four-day workweek isn't for everyone). The fast-growing company has hired 280 employees since September, bringing the total to over 500, according to a recent report by Fast Company.

So how has Bolt been able to implement the four-day workweek as the company expands? Here’s a look at how it works.

Everyone takes the same four days off

All employees work Monday through Thursday, for the most part. Christie said this decision was made so no one feels like they’re missing anything when they’re off. This structure also prevents people from holding meetings when not everyone is present.

“Unless there's some kind of business need, usually driven by a client or a customer-facing commitment that's a little bit beyond our control, we try to have the same days,” she told Protocol. “It does normalize it for everybody and also gives everyone that break. They know that everyone is taking a step back and taking that break, and that things aren't piling up in their inbox … which kind of defeats the purpose of taking a step back.”

Bolt still observes organization holidays

Just because employees work a four-day week doesn’t mean they have to make up for it by skipping corporate holidays. If a holiday falls on a day other than Friday, employees still get Friday off. Leadership is also cognizant of encouraging employees to take advantage of their unlimited vacation day policy. Fridays aren’t viewed as another vacation day; it’s simply a four-day workweek. Christie realizes this is a mindset shift for some.

“We want people to also take time to really step away for several days at a time,” she said. “So we'll be monitoring that as we go just to make sure that other other aspects don't take a hit because we've transitioned to this.”

Fridays are for whatever employees deem necessary

Bolt encourages its employees to use the fifth day of the week for whatever they’d like, whether that is catching up on deep work or spending time with family. There are no rules — just no meetings.

This is a model that many of the companies experimenting with the shortened workweek have adopted. Customer communication platform Front has also experimented with the four-day workweek and implemented what its leaders call “Flexible Fridays.” Much like Bolt, Fridays are designated for intentional work or personal time, and there is no expectation for employees to be online.

Christie is realistic about the idea that Bolt and other companies with shortened workweeks likely still work longer days than they might in a traditional week. It is more of a compressed schedule, she said, and people probably do work closer to a 4-day, 10-hour workweek as opposed to working fewer hours as a whole.

Get leadership on board

Perhaps the most critical factor for making the condensed workweek effective is getting leaders on board, Christie said. It’s pretty hard to implement a four-day workweek if managers are still online sending emails to employees on their day off. Like with all corporate initiatives, leaders are responsible for upholding the workplace culture.

“We've had conversations as a leadership team to say, 'You've got to role model this.' If you're quietly working, people will know, they'll see you online. And if this isn't role modeled all the way through the organization, it won't be sustainable,” she said.


Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Wednesday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.
Latest Stories