Time kills deals: How to avoid getting ghosted by job candidates

84% of job seekers admitted to ghosting in the last 18 months.

Ghosts fleeing from phone call

Ghosting employers isn’t new, but the hot talent market is driving a resurgence of this behavior.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Their LinkedIn was mesmerizing. Sparks flew during the first interview. But afterward, that promising job candidate just… disappeared.

Job seekers are ghosting employers all over the place these days. In the last year and a half alone, 84% of U.S. job candidates have ghosted an employer, potential employer or both, according to a February study from the people analytics software-maker Visier.

Alexandra Von Tiergarten, a Los Angeles-based regional director for the talent firm Robert Half, was ghosted by an entry-level candidate for an internal role within the last week. The candidate had gone through two prior interviews with the firm, but skipped the third-round virtual interview without warning.

“I went back to my team to find out what steps we didn’t do correctly,” Von Tiergarten said. “There were too many days in between the first interview and the interview with me. In that instance, I think time killed us.”

Why you’re getting ghosted

By surveying more than 2,300 senior managers and more than 2,400 workers in the U.S., Robert Half found that 35% of employers who had lost out on a candidate had done so because they were slow to make an offer. 40% lost a candidate because they didn’t allow enough schedule flexibility, and 24% offered too little pay.

“It’s really a representation of what’s going on with talent right now, because we have much more choice,” said Andrea Derler, an organizational economist who works as Visier’s head of Research.

Ghosting employers isn’t new, but the hot talent market is driving a resurgence of this behavior. (And disappearing like this might not be a great employee trait, anyway.) Of the U.S. workers surveyed by Visier, 37% admitted that in the last 18 months, they’d disappeared from an employer, and 30% said they’d ghosted a potential employer. 10% said they’d ghosted both.

And employers are feeling the effects. 39% of employers surveyed by Robert Half said that candidates are ghosting more often than they were two years ago.

Men are more likely than women to ghost, Visier found, with 90% of men and 68% of women admitting to ghosting. Office workers also admitted to more ghosting than front-line workers did. The biggest ghosters of all were senior leaders: 99% of senior vice presidents and 96% of C-level executives admitted that they’d ghosted a potential employer before. Vice presidents (93%) and directors (91%) also did their share of ghosting.

How to ward off ghosts

In order to avoid being ghosted, Robert Half recommends that companies move fast on strong candidates: Time kills deals. Quickly follow up with all candidates, even the ones who aren’t a fit, in order to build a reputation for providing a strong candidate experience. Make that communication “friendly, persuasive and specific,” Robert Half recommends in its report.

Even waiting two or three days to follow up with a strong candidate is too long in this market, Von Tiergarten said.

“In that time frame, they will get other job interviews and perhaps other offers,” Von Tiergarten said. “As you are interviewing a candidate, you’ve got to give them feedback, perhaps at the end of the interview, as to whether or not you are going to be pushing them forward in the process.”

One in three candidates told Robert Half they had ghosted because of a subpar interview process. 29% said they did because they’d received another offer, and 23% ghosted because the job wasn’t what they expected. 16% of workers said they’d ghosted because the company would have required them to work from the office.

Visier found similar results. The main reasons workers reported to Visier were low salary (29%), better job offers (28%), inaccurate job description (27%), poor reputation or online reviews (26%) and poorly perceived work culture (22%).

Poorly written job descriptions are a common obstacle to hiring. Robert Half deals with this type of miscommunication “on a regular basis,” Von Tiergarten said.

“Sometimes there’s a disconnect between what the hiring manager is wanting and the HR professional that wrote the job description,” Von Tiergarten said. “You’ve got some companies that write huge job descriptions with 20 things that they want, and then you have companies that write very narrow job descriptions because they’re trying to get a bigger pool.”

Given how many candidates ghost because they’re disappointed by the compensation on offer, Robert Half recommends that companies make sure their offer is above average on compensation, flexibility and perks, like a sign-on bonus. Von Tiergarten recommends making sure a candidate’s salary expectations fit within budget early. That could happen on the first interview if it’s with the hiring manager, she said.

The tables have turned, and they’ll turn again

Of course, many employers have ghosted on candidates, too, and it can sting. (37% of workers told Visier they’d be more upset about being ghosted by an employer than being stood up on a date.) But as candidates hold more and more power, employers are getting a taste of their own medicine.

“Years ago, it was the employee who was always on the weaker branch of the tree and had to take what they could,” Derler said. “It has implications for how leaders and managers treat employees, from the start of the first hiring interview until they want to consider who gets promoted.”

This is a phase, Derler said, but companies need to adjust if candidates are slipping through their fingers.

“I think that the responsibility currently really lies with the organization, because it’s on them now to create a really good candidate experience and employee experience,” Derler said. “It’s on HR leaders, but also business leaders, to make sure they get the right talent.”


Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or


The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories