Templafy’s CMO: Companies need to keep employees in the loop when they rebrand

Employees are looking up their own logos when creating content. Templafy wants to change that.

people looking at pitch decks

Employees often use Google to look up their company’s logo when creating content.

Photo: ThisisEngineering RAEng/Unsplash

Rebranding should be a massive, companywide undertaking. But the new logos and images that come with rebranding often don’t trickle down to employees, Templafy CMO Greg Sheppard said.

“They might send swag to their employees, and everyone gets a new sweatshirt or something,” Sheppard told Protocol. “But their employees are still using that outdated content for the decks, their templates, imagery and all that stuff.”

Greg Sheppard Greg SheppardPhoto: Templafy

Templafy found in a recent study that nearly 90% of U.S. employees have used Google to look up their company’s logo when creating content. And not only do employees lack the internal infrastructure to create content, but U.S. workers are often involved in a lengthy content approval process that delays their ability to get other work done. Once that content has been approved, the majority of respondents said they find mistakes and errors anyway.

Sheppard said he’s surprised that enterprises lack efficient processes for content creation, especially because Templafy found that most companies want to rebrand anyway. He said it conducted this research to understand the scale of the problem and help enterprises understand how lacking an efficient content creation process impacts them.

In an interview, Sheppard talked with Protocol about why companies struggle to keep employees in the loop on the rebranding process, why they look to rebrand in the first place and Templafy’s role in that undertaking.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Why is there a lack of process for content creation?

This content and the way we define content is broad. And we see content as an enterprisewide issue. Some companies have solved it on a departmental level or localized processes for content creation. But most organizations are not solving it at an enterprise leadership level. They don't have the solutions in place that connect all of the latest content, the brand-approved stuff. They keep putting the content where the employee has to go to get it instead of meeting the employee where they're working. And so this creates lots of challenges.

We get asked a similar question a lot, and we typically see four challenges in this content creation process: The first one is wasted time. The second one is outdated information. And then reviewing content is the third one: too much time spent reviewing. So outdated information happens, despite the fact that 62% of managers — this is kind of insane to me — say that reviewing and policing content is the most important part of their job. And in the U.S., it boggles my mind that an average of 10 employees are involved in review cycles of content. Is this really how we should be spending our time and have our manual labor essentially, on content? And then the fourth piece of it is around brand integrity. Employees are using outdated templates by default. It undermines a brand.

Who has the responsibility of smoothing out this process?

It can fall on a number of people in our organization; what we typically see is it will fall either inside of a marketing organization or in an IT organization. And they've realized this problem exists. And they're going to grab hold and solve it by implementing the right infrastructure that connects that great content to where employees are working. And then everyone gets what they want. You don't see employees using a template that has the 2019 compliance language on the bottom anymore. Or the old logo. So if you meet them where they work inside of Office or G Suite or in Salesforce, then they're happy to use the right content.

What does an efficient content creation process look like?

You're creating all sorts of new content when you're rebranding, and that ultimately has to get down to the employees, right, and get utilized. And what we often see is that companies will undertake a rebrand to focus on all the external content, they have their website or media assets, and then they'll create all this great content, then they don't put that same energy into enabling their own employees. They might send swag to their employees, and everyone gets a new sweatshirt or something. But their employees are still using that outdated content for their decks, their templates, imagery and all that stuff. And then the brand teams become your brand police. And it's a big mess.

When companies work with Templafy to activate their rebrands, they're improving the whole content creation process by default. So all that new, amazing brand content is fed to employees inside of the tools that are already working. So when an employee opens Microsoft Office or Google Workspace to create a deck or to put together a sales proposal, the right content is sitting there ready, so they can access it as easily as they could access the last deck. Or they're going into Salesforce and they're putting together the proposal, their report there is using the right branding. So the companies that are doing it well are doing it because it sits inside of those workflows.

What tools and resources would you recommend companies use if they're looking to rebrand?

Once they've decided to rebrand, I think I would encourage companies to think about how they're going to enable their employees to become brand ambassadors for that rebrand. Very often companies are going to work with their agency, and they're going to create new advertising and media, and they're going to update the website because they can control that themselves. But I definitely encourage and speak to customers all the time about how you enable your employees to become those ambassadors. How do you make sure that your sales team, every time they're speaking to a customer, they’re using the new brand? How do you ensure that the QBR that your customer team is running with your top customer isn't the old branding, even though it's six months later? And that goes back to meeting the employees where they are. That's what Templafy does.

Why might a company look to rebrand in the first place?

We typically see three top ones for companies to rebrand: growth, change and reposition. So, growth could pertain to funding rounds and upcoming IPO. The overall expansion and our research show that not only are a large majority of U.S. enterprises considering the rebrand in the next five years, they also feel confident and ready to tackle it. So 54% of our panelists agree that it will be beneficial to their organization to help it achieve its goals. But brand activation is a mountain that many enterprises are unable to climb, because they don't have that infrastructure or the process in place for content creation. And I said before that content is everything and everywhere. And 69% of our respondents agree that the content rollout will be the most challenging aspect of a rebrand.

Change is the second thing. It could be a new CEO or something as simple as that. New products that are shifting a company's market positioning or even M&A activity.

The last one is repositioning. That could include change or expanding across markets, investing in a corporate identity program, things like that.

Did it surprise you that so many respondents were looking to rebrand?

Not really. You see cycles. And when we looked at, over the next five years, that seems to be about right.

So every five years, there's a cycle of companies looking to rebrand?

I actually don't think it's as simple as every five years you do it, I think companies are actually often changing their branding and tweaking things as they go. There's often this bigger rebrand that happens in a five- to seven-year cycle. But then over the course of those years, there's always tweaks happening, and there's small adjustments happening.

From the employee front, how does a lack of efficient content creation processes affect whether they’re content at a company?

Our customers love Templafy because it makes their life easier. They have tools to simplify and speed up the document creation process, then they also are utilizing the best-performing content creation process.

The challenge that Templafy is solving is increasing in this new digital HQ world. It's exacerbated the challenge that's always existed. And now you've got employees that are all over the world working, whether they're at their offices, whether they’re at home or they're working from the beach. Much more than ever before, they need the right tools.


Google is wooing a coalition of civil rights allies. It’s working.

The tech giant is adept at winning friends even when it’s not trying to immediately influence people.

A map display of Washington lines the floor next to the elevators at the Google office in Washington, D.C.

Photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images

As Google has faced intensifying pressure from policymakers in recent years, it’s founded trade associations, hired a roster of former top government officials and sometimes spent more than $20 million annually on federal lobbying.

But the company has also become famous in Washington for nurturing less clearly mercenary ties. It has long funded the work of laissez-faire economists who now defend it against antitrust charges, for instance. It’s making inroads with traditional business associations that once pummeled it on policy, and also supports think tanks and advocacy groups.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Sustainability. It can be a charged word in the context of blockchain and crypto – whether from outsiders with a limited view of the technology or from insiders using it for competitive advantage. But as a CEO in the industry, I don’t think either of those approaches helps us move forward. We should all be able to agree that using less energy to get a task done is a good thing and that there is room for improvement in the amount of energy that is consumed to power different blockchain technologies.

So, what if we put the enormous industry talent and minds that have created and developed blockchain to the task of building in a more energy-efficient manner? Can we not just solve the issues but also set the standard for other industries to develop technology in a future-proof way?

Keep Reading Show less
Denelle Dixon, CEO of SDF

Denelle Dixon is CEO and Executive Director of the Stellar Development Foundation, a non-profit using blockchain to unlock economic potential by making money more fluid, markets more open, and people more empowered. Previously, Dixon served as COO of Mozilla. Leading the business, revenue and policy teams, she fought for Net Neutrality and consumer privacy protections and was responsible for commercial partnerships. Denelle also served as general counsel and legal advisor in private equity and technology.


Everything you need to know about tech layoffs and hiring slowdowns

Will tech companies and startups continue to have layoffs?

It’s not just early-stage startups that are feeling the burn.

Photo: Kirsty O'Connor/PA Images via Getty Images

What goes up must come down.

High-flying startups with record valuations, huge hiring goals and ambitious expansion plans are now announcing hiring slowdowns, freezes and in some cases widespread layoffs. It’s the dot-com bust all over again — this time, without the cute sock puppet and in the midst of a global pandemic we just can’t seem to shake.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


Sink into ‘Love, Death & Robots’ and more weekend recs

Don’t know what to do this weekend? We’ve got you covered.

Our favorite picks for your weekend pleasure.

Image: A24; 11 bit studios; Getty Images

We could all use a bit of a break. This weekend we’re diving into Netflix’s beautifully animated sci-fi “Love, Death & Robots,” losing ourselves in surreal “Men” and loving Zelda-like Moonlighter.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at


This machine would like to interview you for a job

Companies are embracing automated video interviews to filter through floods of job applicants. But interviews with a computer screen raise big ethical questions and might scare off candidates.

Although automated interview companies claim to reduce bias in hiring, the researchers and advocates who study AI bias are these companies’ most frequent critics.

Photo: Johner Images via Getty Images

Applying for a job these days is starting to feel a lot like online dating. Job-seekers send their resume into portal after portal and a silent abyss waits on the other side.

That abyss is silent for a reason and it has little to do with the still-tight job market or the quality of your particular resume. On the other side of the portal, hiring managers watch the hundreds and even thousands of resumes pile up. It’s an infinite mountain of digital profiles, most of them from people completely unqualified. Going through them all would be a virtually fruitless task.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email:, where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

Latest Stories