DoorDash is hiring employees — not contractors — for a 15-minute delivery service

DoorDash launched its first 15-minute-or-less delivery service in Chelsea, Manhattan for convenience store items, entering an already packed competition for the ultra-fast delivery market.

A DoorDash delivery driver on a bicycle

“People want more and more convenience over time,” DoorDash VP of Public Policy Max Rettig told Protocol.

Photo: Alexi Rosenfeld/Getty Images

DoorDash officially entered the chaotic war to capture the market for 15-minute deliveries today and opened a new chapter in its history by hiring full-time employees, not gig workers, to run the operation.

DoorDash, which opened its first ultra-fast delivery hub for convenience items in Chelsea today, is emulating companies like Gorillas, JOKR and Buyk, which already offer Manhattan-based 15-minute or less delivery using employees rather than gig workers. The move to the employee model for this service has become standard because delivery in such a short time span requires that workers always be available, instead of opting for specific times to work in the more traditional gig model. If DoorDash wants to compete in the ultra-fast market, the gig worker model it relies on for regular deliveries is just not going to cut it. In this system, DoorDash employees will also stock and manage the local delivery facility, called a DashMart. (DashMarts are DoorDash-owned-and-operated convenience stores that were first created in August 2020).

While ultra-fast delivery is far more normal in major cities in Southeast Asia and Europe, Manhattan and the other four boroughs have become the experimental launch site for DoorDash and other delivery companies to see if people are willing to pay for speedier delivery. DoorDash plans to eventually expand from its one hub in Chelsea to several across the city, and then into other cities. Instacart also plans to launch a similar service with an employee model next year, according to a leaked report obtained by The Information.

For regular gig workers, ever-increasing delivery time pressure has become a source of danger, causing accidents and injuries. The new employee model, which includes ultra-local hubs with limited delivery radii and company-provided bikes, is intended to improve safety while further increasing the speed of delivery.

Apparently, consumers are needy people who see 35- to 45-minute deliveries as slow. “Consumer expectations around convenience have really evolved. It tends to evolve only in one direction — people want more and more convenience over time,” said DoorDash VP of Public Policy Max Rettig. So this Protocol reporter asked whether DoorDash has contemplated the more philosophical, existential question about whether there’s such a thing as “too fast” delivery, or if there’s an upper limit where, perhaps, the customer expectation just isn’t reasonable.

“Somewhere there is a limit here. You’re not going to be able to get something before you order it, maybe that’s the upper bound,” Rettig replied.

He dismissed questions about whether it made sense to enter an already brutally competitive market. “We’ve always been operating in a competitive environment. And we’ve often done so as the late entrant or the underdog. None of that is unfamiliar to us. We think we have some real strengths,” he said, rattling off a list including the company’s core business profits and its “willingness to listen” to customers and merchants. (Gig worker activists and union organizers might disagree with Rettig’s characterization of the company.)

DoorDash will supply and pay for delivery equipment and e-bikes from Zoomo, an e-bike subscription service from Australia that offers bikes for rent to gig workers. The company will have extra bikes on hand in case of flat tires, and Zoomo will perform regular maintenance on the bikes. DoorDash said it would be capping the upper speed of the e-bikes to 20 miles per hour (e-bikes are legal in New York City as long as their top speed does not exceed 25 miles per hour), and, during his conversation with Protocol, Rettig said that full-time workers will have access to traditional workers' compensation for injuries and benefits like health insurance and part-time workers will be able to access the same occupational accident insurance provided to gig workers.

The company is also exploring different ways to offer the same 15-minute delivery for local bodegas, though Rettig said the company does not yet know whether those deliveries would be handled by traditional gig workers or the new employees. Rettig compared the creation of the planned bodega delivery service to the way DoorDash originally evolved from regular gig work deliveries to an additional “white-label” platform called Drive where restaurants can create their own delivery service in partnership with DoorDash.


A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories