Protocol | Workplace

Why some managers still don't understand the role of unions

Employees are speaking up more now than they ever have before, and they're demanding change.

Zoom panel

At our latest Protocol Live event, Ifeoma Ozoma and Jack Poulson joined us in conversation with Expensify CEO David Barrett.

Image: Protocol/Zoom

Gone are the days when employees sit back and cower when they're mistreated in the workplace, or when their company does something unethical. In today's era, workers are speaking up, organizing and forming unions.

At our latest Protocol Live event, tech whistleblowers Ifeoma Ozoma, a former public policy and and social impact manager at Pinterest, and Jack Poulson, a former senior research scientist at Google, joined us in conversation with Expensify CEO David Barrett to talk about this new era of empowered employees.

Last June, Ozoma and her former colleague, Aerica Shimizu Banks, who are both Black women, alleged racial and gender discrimination at Pinterest. Ozoma's experience at Pinterest motivated her to co-author the Silenced No More Act, which aims to ban non-disclosure agreements that restrict workers from speaking out about racial discrimination and other forms of abuse.

Poulson resigned from Google in 2018 following a report that Google was experimenting with building a censored search engine for China. Since the firing of Dr. Timnit Gebru, once a leading AI ethicist at Google, Poulson said people started to better understand how leaders at Google behave.

"To some degree, I feel vindicated by some of the more enlightened views of what tech ethics is now," he said.

Barrett made headlines last year when he encouraged Expensify's 10 million customers to vote for now-President Joe Biden. During the panel, he described how all employees had a chance to weigh in on the decision and how Expensify sent the email only after reaching a supermajority of employees in favor of sending it.

Barrett represented the corporate voice in the conversation, but said he "would hope to align myself with this sort of tech employee perspective."

He noted his time as a programmer and how many of the employee concerns raised in the panel were part of the reason he started Expensify. Expensify, for example, tries to solve for any potential pay discrimination by having employees vote on compensation through an internal tool.

"And what's nice about this is it means there is no manager that has a thumb over you," he said.

Ozoma said she was fascinated by many of the things Barrett said, particularly around transparency. But she took issue with Barrett trying to associate himself with workers.

"You are, respectfully, management still," Ozoma said. "You are not a worker or an employee."

Ozoma later asked Barrett if he would support the Silenced No More Act, to which he said, "Sign me up."

Pinterest CEO Ben Silbermann in April threw Pinterest's support behind the bill, adding at the time that Pinterest will no longer require employees to sign NDAs that would prevent them from talking about their personal experiences at Pinterest once they leave.

But Ozoma said Barrett's commitment is far more concrete than Silbermann's. Barrett agreed to include the following sentence in employee agreements: "Nothing in this agreement prevents you from discussing or disclosing information about unlawful acts in the workplace, such as harassment or discrimination or any other conduct you have reason to believe is unlawful."

Within a few hours following the event, Barrett tweeted that he spoke with Expensify's corporate counsel and received the go-ahead to update the company's employee documents.

"I like to see things codified, so I want to see it in writing somewhere that you are adopting this policy for your full-time and contract employees," Ozoma said during the event. "So far as that goes, no company has done that yet, although I'm encouraged and expect to see it from David and Expensify."

Poulson, who has observed his former Google colleagues unionize, thinks the best way to tackle conversations around pay and other big decisions is through negotiation with a union, he said.

"I think commitments to voluntarily recognize employee unions along the same lines as what Ifeoma was just talking about are critical," he said. "Unfortunately, even some of the most hallowed civil liberties organizations sometimes don't do that."

Pinterest does not currently have a union, but Ozoma said she is confident in the power of collective action.

"But I'm also confident that the company is doing everything it can to squash any sort of collectivism," she said. "[...] I heard that Ben is scared shitless about employees unionizing."

Pinterest declined to comment on Ozoma's characterization of how Silbermann feels about employees potentially unionizing at the company.

At Expensify, Barrett said he would willingly recognize a union, but would wonder what he did to "make anyone feel like that was the correct solution."

In Barrett's mind, unionizing is a "a really important solution to a problem. But it's also a recognition that there was a problem to be solved in the first place."

Ozoma interjected, saying Barrett's understanding of unions is quite common, but also a big misconception.

"We have a bill of rights and we have rights that are codified for a reason," she said. "Not because you have to wait until said right is violated to then reference the document. The purpose of a union is not to be in conflict with management, it's to ensure that workers have a seat at the table. It's to ensure that workers have their voices heard in a way that is not the same for everyone."

Poulson, for example, spoke about how a conversation with his manager resulted in his pay doubling, but Ozoma said she and Poulson would have different conversations with a manager "because of how we present, because of who we are," even if they use the exact same words. Ozoma used that as an example of how unions can help empower employees who don't have the same amount of privilege as other workers.

"While I understand your understanding of unions," Ozoma said to Barrett, "I would encourage you to reframe it a little bit to understand that if your workers came to you, that doesn't mean anything is in conflict. They may love working at Expensify and want to ensure that if you were to be hit by a bus and someone else were to become the CEO of Expensify, they retain the rights and they retain the culture that you have said you've established."

Poulson added that he believes it's critical to look back at Hewlett-Packard's role in establishing what it looks like for companies to negotiate with workers in order to prevent them from unionizing.

"You know, providing employees with this cushy lifestyle — and I think that's part of why we see such immense comforts for workers — is that it is part of this deal that was kind of hinted at earlier, which is that you shouldn't have a union until things are sufficiently bad," he said. "[...] Basically these niceties are often framed explicitly as how you prevent a union. I think we need to know the history there — that it actually comes from a very reactionary right-wing history."

Protocol | Workplace

Productivity apps can’t stop making money

ClickUp had one of the biggest Series C funding rounds ever. Here's how it matches up to the other productivity unicorns.

ClickUp made $400 million in its series C funding round.

Photo: ClickUp

Productivity platform ClickUp announced a milestone today. The company raised $400 million, which is one of the biggest series C funding rounds in the workplace productivity market ever. The round, led by Andreessen Horowitz and Tiger Global, put the private company at a $4 billion valuation post-money.

In case it's not clear: This is a massive amount of money. It shows how hot the productivity space is right now, with some predicting the market size could reach almost $120 billion by 2028. In a world of hybrid workers, all-in-one tool platforms are all the rage among both startups and productivity stalwarts. Companies everywhere want to escape tool overwhelm, where work is spread across dozens of apps.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

If you've ever tried to pick up a new fitness routine like running, chances are you may have fallen into the "motivation vs. habit" trap once or twice. You go for a run when the sun is shining, only to quickly fall off the wagon when the weather turns sour.

Similarly, for many businesses, 2020 acted as the storm cloud that disrupted their plans for innovation. With leaders busy grappling with the pandemic, innovation frequently got pushed to the backburner. In fact, according to McKinsey, the majority of organizations shifted their focus mainly to maintaining business continuity throughout the pandemic.

Keep Reading Show less
Gaurav Kataria
Group Product Manager, Trello at Atlassian
The Supreme Court of the United States
Photo: Angel Xavier Viera-Vargas

If a company resolved a data breach in the past, does it need to disclose the potential negative fallout of that breach as a risk to investors later on? In a new petition asking the Supreme Court to take up the question, Alphabet is arguing emphatically: no. And it's using the ol' "the past is history, tomorrow's a mystery" defense.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Protocol | Workplace

Facebook’s hiring crisis: Engineers are turning down offers

"All of you are now starting to experience that major imbalance between supply and demand — and it doesn't feel good," a recruiting leader wrote in an internal memo.

Here are all the Facebook Papers stories
Image: Getty Images, Protocol

Facebook cannot find enough candidates to meet engineering demand, especially in the Bay Area, and has struggled and failed to meet early 2021 recruiting goals, according to a detailed internal memo outlining recruitment strategy and hiring pains.

The company also failed to meet hiring goals in 2019, which frustrated CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and it built an ad-hoc team of leaders to create an emergency plan to address the painful shortage, according to disclosures made to the Securities and Exchange Commission and provided to Congress in redacted form by Frances Haugen's legal counsel. A consortium of news organizations, including Protocol, has reviewed the redacted versions received by Congress.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email: akramer@protocol.com), where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

Theranos trial reveals DeVos family invested $100 million

The family committed "on the spot" to double its investment, an investment adviser said. Meanwhile, the jury lost another two members, with two alternates left.

Betsy DeVos' family invested $100 million in Theranos, an investment adviser said.

Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Lisa Peterson, a wealth manager for the DeVos family, testified in Elizabeth Holmes's criminal fraud trial Tuesday, as prosecutors continued to highlight allegations about how the Theranos CEO courted investors in the once-high-flying blood-testing startup.

An email presented by the defense revealed that the family committed to doubling their investment in Theranos to $100 million "on the spot" during a 2014 visit to company headquarters.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma
Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.
Latest Stories