Get ready to beg: Executive recruiters are too busy for you

It’s never been this hard — or expensive — to hire, and executive search firms are loving it.

Businesspeople shaking hands

Much of recruiting can now be done without long car or plane trips to meet clients and candidates.

Photo: Hispanolistic/Getty Images

It’s a tough time to hire — but it’s never been a better time to be a recruiter.

With record levels of investment and M&A activity in the tech industry, fast-growing tech companies can’t hire executives fast enough. That means recruiting firms are juggling more searches than ever, and companies have to wait in line to even start a search.

“It’s really unlike anything I’ve seen in the last 20 years,” said Mike Foley, regional managing partner of Heidrick & Struggles’ Technology and Services practice in the Americas. “It’s definitely booming.”

Another placement firm, Daversa Partners, performed over 750 searches last year, partner Frank Cumella estimated. The firm hired 90 staff members of its own over the same period to pick up the slack, but “it wasn’t enough to support the demand and market,” said Cumella, who recruits executives for enterprise software and consumer internet companies.

Recruiting remotely

Not even the switch to remote work in the past two years, which allowed recruiting firms to pack in more meetings in less time, has helped with the backlog of searches. Much of recruiting can now be done without long car or plane trips to meet clients and candidates.

That’s a big change from before the pandemic. Foley is based in Boston, but before 2020 he spent almost 70% of his time on the road. Kelly Kinnard, Khosla Ventures’ head of Talent, said that when she was a recruiter a decade ago, she would drive to meet every candidate: “Look them in the eye, assess their gravitas, get a sense of who they are.”

Some of the nuance is lost over Zoom, Kinnard said, “but busy executives are busy, and recruiters are now able to get away with doing eight Zoom calls a day instead of driving to Mountain View, and then Cupertino, and then Sunnyvale.”

Foley said that while recruiting remotely, it’s been harder to accurately gauge a candidate’s level of interest in a new role. More executives are willing to hop on a call than meet for an in-person lunch, after all.

Travel and in-person meetings are starting to come back: Both Foley and Cumella are back at the office and holding in-person meetings, they said.

Money pouring in

All these searches mean big bucks for recruiters. Executive searches typically cost $100,000 or more — the going rate is 28% to 33% of the executive’s first-year pay, according to Kinnard.

And these fees are going up. One VC talent partner reported seeing searches go from the $80,000-to-$100,000 range up to $150,000. Kinnard referenced a go-to-market search firm that she said had doubled its retained search fee and now won’t do a search for less than $225,000.

“The fees have just gotten unbelievable. They’re higher than I’ve ever seen,” Kinnard said. “Every time I think they can’t go up, they go up.”

That particular firm limits its recruiters to five searches at a time, which was the norm when Kinnard worked as a recruiter. Cumella said it’s hard to focus on more than five or six searches at a time, so Daversa has been hiring aggressively to avoid overwhelming its recruiters.

Some others are juggling more work. Kinnard said she knows one recruiter — a specialist in recruiting VPs of HR — who now takes on 16 searches at a time.

“There’s just no way you can do a good job [juggling that many searches],” Kinnard said. “But they have so much business and they all feel like, ‘Now’s the time I can make a ton of money.’”

Reputable recruiting partners can easily make over $1 million or $1.5 million per year right now without doing any proactive business development, Kinnard said. Two other VC talent heads, including Holly Rose Faith of Greylock Partners, agreed that top recruiters are likely making more than $1 million per year.

(Foley demurred when asked about this range, while Cumella said that Daversa’s search partners hadn’t seen a windfall because the firm has been staffing up rather than having partners take on more searches.)

The waiting game

When Kinnard worked as a recruiter, she wouldn’t have let an hour go by before answering a client inquiry.

Now that she’s on the client side, her emails to search firms sometimes go unanswered for days. When she does hear back, recruiters often say they don’t have time to start a new search for a few weeks or even a few months. When Kinnard is looking for a search partner to work with one of her portfolio companies, she now takes timing into account: Which firm even has time to take on another search right now?

Foley said that Heidrick recruiters are “more open than ever” with clients on when they can start a project. “The last thing both sides want to do is get into a situation where we can’t tackle what they’re asking us to do, and that spoils our reputation or ends up with a bad outcome,” Foley said.

Faith, of Greylock, agreed. For search clients, it’s better to wait to start a search than to hire a recruiter who doesn’t have time to do a good job.

As a result, recruiters are increasingly picky about which searches they’ll take on. It can be so competitive to get in with a recruiter, founders of top-tier VC-backed businesses are “kind of just feeling fortunate to have the opportunity to partner with a top executive search firm,” Cumella said.

Recruiters have the luxury of deciding whether they want to work with a particular company or team, or whether the company seems motivated to get the search done quickly.

“Often, they’re doing calls with companies, and they’re like, ‘This CEO seems too difficult to work with. I’m going to pass,’” Kinnard said. “The tables have really turned, in the sense that the recruiters are really in the position of power right now.”


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more .

Keep Reading Show less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison ( @dgoodison ) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep Reading Show less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich ) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories