Workplace

Top tech candidates are anti-Facebook. It started long before the Facebook Papers.

Potential applicants felt most upset about the company's ability to censor, either believing it went too far or that it didn't do enough to prevent the spread of misinformation.

Facebook Papers: Facebook logo cracking

The company has struggled to battle a negative perception for tech candidates in comparison to its top tech competitors.

Image: Protocol

Nearly a year into the pandemic, Facebook hit a four-month spate with a 600% increase in 1-star reviews on Glassdoor in the United States. Nine former employees who gave one-star reviews were frustrated with the lack of work-life balance and what they called a "toxic culture."

In the same few months, the company saw the lowest proportion of positive sentiment online from potential tech candidates compared to competitive peers like Google, Pinterest, TikTok and Microsoft, and the second-highest proportion of negative sentiment, falling just below Uber. This moment of negative feedback landed just as the pandemic and remote work seemed like they would trap everyone endlessly behind their computers, keeping software engineers tied to their laptops late into the night. That same quarter, Facebook also found that nearly 50% of its software engineering candidates rejected job offers, prompting a memo titled "Why is recruiting so hard right now."

Facebook's summary of its negative former employee reviews and how potential tech candidates perceive the company appeared in a report titled "Q1 2021 Global External Partnerships QBR Summaries," included as part of disclosures made to the SEC and provided to Congress in redacted form by Frances Haugen's legal counsel. A consortium of news organizations, including Protocol, has reviewed the redacted versions received by Congress.

A spokesperson from Meta (the parent company name for Facebook) told Protocol that the report "was a standard update provided to an individual team. Feedback among teams is a core part of our culture and it helps us learn where we're doing well or where we need to improve. We continue to review the most effective way to engage and attract talent."

Tech companies have struggled mightily for talent amid a tightening labor market. While Facebook has reputational issues that contribute to candidate hesitation, a wide range of companies, newly flush with cash from VCs and IPOs, have grown more willing to pay top dollar for candidates. The fight for employees has likely been made worse by the design of tech recruiting systems, which often exclude talented individuals who have less traditional resumes, education or backgrounds. Google's reputation for an especially brutal interview process and the fact that resume-reviewers tend to favor certain companies and schools are just two examples of the multi-faceted problem.

The QBR Summaries report details how Facebook held staff meetings with Glassdoor, Brandwatch, LinkedIn and other partners. According to the memo, Facebook spent $115,313 paying to advertise jobs during the quarter, at an average cost of $7.75 per application. The memo also explains that in the first few months of 2021 Facebook struggled to attract qualified tech candidates in comparison to its competitors (Microsoft, Google, TikTok, Pinterest, Amazon and Airbnb are among the competitors listed in the report's charts). Still, the report shows that Facebook's overall reception from current employees and potential candidates was generally positive when compared to the hiring field as a whole. The company landed at #11 on the Glassdoor Best Places to Work list in 2021, up more than 10 spots from 2020.

"Facebook is pacing behind peers from the 2021 best places to work list in the US and we are behind our goal of increasing our rating 0.1 YoY," an unnamed Facebook employee wrote in the QBR Summaries memo. "The recent increase in 1-star reviews was enough to pull our overall on-site global rating down from 4.4 to 4.3 in March." When the Glassdoor list came out later in 2021, the rating remained unchanged from 2020 at 4.4 stars, indicating that reviews recovered after the first quarter.

While Glassdoor ratings for "comp and benefits" remained extremely high for the company, the ratings for "work-life balance," already low at 3.68 in January 2021 compared to every other category, dropped to 3.32 in March, according to a ratings chart included in the report.

Data from Brandwatch — which scans external media for mentions of Facebook — revealed that Facebook employees are positive about their talented peers and compensation and feel most negatively about work-life balance, management and the regular frequency of performance reviews, according to the memo. Negativity for potential applicants was driven by news about current events, mainly Facebook's handling of misinformation. The trend of employee frustration with work-life balance wasn't isolated to Facebook but instead applied to companies across the board, according to the data.

The report also delves into how candidates and employees feel about competitors: Microsoft had the most positive employee social sentiment, at 51%, while TikTok had the most negative (34%). Facebook had the lowest proportion of positive sentiment (14%) amongst its peers for potential tech candidates (while TikTok had the highest, at 26%) and the second-highest proportion of negative sentiment, falling at 34% just below Uber's 35%. Pinterest had the lowest proportion of negative sentiment, at 17%, and the second-highest proportion of positive sentiment, tied with Microsoft at 25%.

"Facebook candidate conversation fluctuated with current events," the report's author wrote. Potential applicants were far more negative about the company than actual employees, and most felt upset with the company's ability to censor, either believing it went too far or that the company didn't do enough to prevent the spread of misinformation.

Candidates also indicated an interest in understanding how Facebook was making progress on diversity goals, while employees recognized the efforts around diversity and inclusion but also found it to be sometimes disingenuous. The report's authors wrote that Facebook needs to solicit employee feedback to find "what feels unnatural," as well as "strive to create conditions that improve inclusion on a daily basis."

The analysis in the report also showed areas where other competitors are performing especially strongly with their employees. For Microsoft, those areas were work-life balance and mentorship opportunities, while at Amazon workers were most excited about potential for growth at the companies.

This story was updated on Nov. 10, 2021 with a comment from a Meta company spokesperson.

Policy

How I decided to go all-in on a federal contract — before assignment

Amanda Renteria knew Code for America could help facilitate access to expanded child tax credits. She also knew there was no guarantee her proof of concept would convince others — but tried anyway.

Code for America CEO Amanda Renteria explained how it's helped people claim the Child Tax Credit.

Photo: Code for America

Click banner image for more How I decided series

After the American Rescue Plan Act passed in March 2021, the U.S. government expanded child tax credits to provide relief for American families during the pandemic. The legislation allowed some families to nearly double their tax benefits per child, which was especially critical for low-income families, who disproportionately bore the financial brunt of the pandemic.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Climate

This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Workplace

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Climate

The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Latest Stories
Bulletins