Workplace

The Facebook Papers show that employees like criticizing Facebook as much as everyone else does

On internal channels, Facebook employees aren't afraid to speak their minds.

Facebook Papers: Mark Zuckerberg

The candid conversations employees have on Workplace, which at times level serious criticisms at the company, are a product of Facebook's "open culture."

George Frey/Bloomberg; Getty Images; Protocol illustration

On a Wednesday in July 2020, a Facebook employee wrote in the "Green @ Global'' internal message board that outside climate groups and activists were urging the company to treat climate misinformation as a public health threat. The employee posted an open letter that called for more action on the part of the company.

The first employee responses seemed benign, routine. "Thank you, we are engaging with the policy team to determine a FB response," one unknown employee wrote in the discussion, according to disclosures made to the SEC and provided to Congress in redacted form by Frances Haugen's legal counsel. A consortium of news organizations, including Protocol, has reviewed the redacted versions received by Congress. All of the names in the conversations are blacked out.

But the third comment took a turn. "Is there something wrong with us having an open platform where people can post arguments for either side of an issue and then people make up their own minds for themselves?" an unknown worker wrote. "If there's a group that wants to post the earth is flat, should they not be allowed to?"

Employees balked at the comment. "As an environmental program manager, can you explain why you've repeatedly sided with climate change denial in this group?" one person asked, to which the original poster responded, "Please take your attacks elsewhere because you've now created an unsafe space for open discourse here."

There are plenty of similar conversations on Workplace, Facebook's internal communication forum that looks a bit like Facebook itself. Facebook employees generally treat each other kindly on the platform; if an employee puts together a well-researched presentation, others cheer. But employees also use Workplace to level serious criticism and have hot-tempered discussions on issues ranging from Facebook's role in climate denial to how it should handle restricting and demoting content.

Workplace pitches itself as a highly accessible, transparent workplace platform. Facebook also sells the product to other companies to use for messaging, collaboration and knowledge storage. But Workplace was a Facebook tool first, as it grew out of Facebook employees' need for more central communication. Facebookers rarely use email for their day-to-day.

The conversations are a product of Facebook's "open culture." "Mark wants an open culture. He wants people to be able to know what's happening in product, to know what's happening across the company," said Monique Hall, a former policy communications spokesperson referring to how Haugen accessed the leaked documents. Hall left Facebook last December.

Facebook spokesperson Tracy Clayton said the company "deeply values expression" and has guidelines for company expectations regarding respectful communications, but did not explain those policies. "Feedback is a core part of our culture and it helps us learn where we're doing well or where we need to improve," Clayton told Protocol.

Those expectations are a bit higher for employees than Facebook users, said Sophie Zhang, a former employee and whistleblower who was fired last year. "If you post something calling out Mark Zuckerberg and accusing him of leading a conspiracy to destroy democracy, it doesn't matter if there's a rule against it, the company will find a rule to fire you."

Hosting an open employee forum in an official capacity like this is "somewhat unique," according to Claire Schmidt, CEO of employee feedback platform AllVoices. "I think it's actually fantastic for a company to provide as many communication channels as possible for employees," Schmidt said. But public employee feedback only goes so far, Schmidt noted. "There are a lot of employees who will not feel comfortable sharing completely honestly in a public internal forum like that," she said.

Jessica Yuen, a human resources advisor, said companies are generally more focused on receiving employee feedback than before, as the pandemic squished work and home life closer together. Tools like Slack, Workplace and Discord have made worker communication easier than ever — in some cases helping workers build power. Some companies have leaned into open lines of communication; others have not.

Even in companies that welcome uninhibited feedback, there can often be retaliation. Schmidt said this is why offering an anonymous option is so important. "If it's a company-sponsored tool, there's probably a feeling of safety for some employees using it, whether that's false or not," she said. "People don't really know what's acceptable and what's not and what type of action might be taken as a result of something they post."

Facebook uses anonymous feedback forms as well, and designates groups within Workplace for asking sensitive questions. Group administrators will post questions on behalf of other anonymous employees.

The company doesn't mind openness, Zhang said, "as long as it doesn't interfere with self interest." She added that recently the company more often chooses the latter.

Still, employees are remarkably blunt with each other on the Workplace platform. In August 2020, an employee expressed concern over the way Facebook dealt with an assault on protesters during demonstrations that took place after Jacob Blake was shot by police and severely injured. The platform was sued for failing to take action on the attack, even after hundreds of people complained.

"I know our company is full of dedicated smart people who want to do the right thing, including our leadership," the person wrote. "However, I don't think the current system we are working in enables us to succeed, even as we have the money, talent and motivation that should lead us on the right path."

The employee said workers should be asking why hateful content doesn't proliferate on other platforms like it does on Facebook, adding a few suggestions for the problem. "I still believe that the best way to complain is to build things, so I'd love to build something better rather than just pontificate."

In another instance, Fidji Simo, head of the Facebook app at the time, posted a lengthy update about Facebook's plan to introduce more private spaces within the app in March 2019. The post provoked spirited discussion, with mostly positive feedback. Some felt comfortable posting honest criticism: "As positive as all these changes are, it feels like we could have had them a lot sooner if we had done a better job at listening to our critics over the course of this company's history," one employee wrote. Another employee responded "It's hard to put stock in the words of critics when your share price is soaring. Now that we are hurting, we start to listen more."

Not all banter is critical; some is full of encouragement. In June 2020, when an employee sent out a proposal to deal with newsworthy content that violates Facebook's rules, coworkers expressed support. "This is awesome. Thank you for putting this together," one person said. "THIS IS AMAZING," another said.

And then there are the badge posts. These are farewell posts Facebook employees leave on Workplace when they exit the company. Zhang posted a particularly infamous one that was later deleted by Facebook. In the post she wrote that she had "blood on [her] hands" and called out the company for being slow to act on fake accounts sowing misinformation. A "Social Good" team member posted a farewell on Dec. 4, 2020, cautioning against relying on AI to solve all problems and against Facebook pushing risky features to achieve growth.

"The last two years have been some of the most intense, interesting, and exhausting of my career," the team member wrote. "But right now it's time for me to take a breath."

Additional reporting by Issie Lapowsky.

Fintech

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Enterprise

Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Policy

The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

A 'Soho house for techies': VCs place a bet on community

Contrary is the latest venture firm to experiment with building community spaces instead of offices.

Contrary NYC is meant to re-create being part of a members-only club where engineers and entrepreneurs can hang out together, have a space to work, and host events for people in tech.

Photo: Courtesy of Contrary

In the pre-pandemic times, Contrary’s network of venture scouts, founders, and top technologists reflected the magnetic pull Silicon Valley had on the tech industry. About 80% were based in the Bay Area, with a smattering living elsewhere. Today, when Contrary asked where people in its network were living, the split had changed with 40% in the Bay Area and another 40% living in or planning to move to New York.

It’s totally bifurcated now, said Contrary’s founder Eric Tarczynski.

Keep Reading Show less
Biz Carson

Biz Carson ( @bizcarson) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol, covering Silicon Valley with a focus on startups and venture capital. Previously, she reported for Forbes and was co-editor of Forbes Next Billion-Dollar Startups list. Before that, she worked for Business Insider, Gigaom, and Wired and started her career as a newspaper designer for Gannett.

Latest Stories
Bulletins