Nvidia, Google, Box and other tech companies dominate Glassdoor’s 'Best Places to Work'

Glassdoor announced its rankings for 2022.

Employees at work

Glassdoor released its "Best Places to Work" list for 2022.

Photo: Pexels

Glassdoor released its 2022 "Best Places to Work" list on Wednesday. The verdict: Tech companies ruled the rankings. Chip giant Nvidia topped the list, and a total of 40 tech companies ranked in the top 100 best places to work among large U.S. companies. This is up from 28 tech companies in 2021.

Glassdoor compiles its "Best Places to Work" list via its own algorithm, taking into consideration the consistency and quality of employee reviews submitted. As the pandemic wears on, workers report that tech companies continue to excel when it comes to offering flexibility and positive employee experiences, said Glassdoor senior economist Daniel Zhao. A large number of tech companies have continued to allow employees to work from home either full-time or part-time, something Glassdoor heard from employees is a highly valued benefit.

“What we've seen on Glassdoor is that discussions of burnout have more than doubled over the course of the pandemic, and so that priority on employee experience has really shone through,” he told Protocol.

Even though tech companies are leading the list of the best large companies, those on top might not be the companies you expect. Some of the former heavy-hitters have fallen in Glassdoor’s rankings this year. Meta dropped to No. 47, its lowest ranking on the "Best Places to Work" list since first appearing in 2011. The company notably experienced a 600% increase in 1-star reviews over a fourth-month period on Glassdoor in the U.S. last year. Zoom also fell in the rankings this year. The videoconferencing platform is now listed at No. 100 after ranking at 22 last year.

While Zhao said this year was more competitive than ever, it’s also about how employers have responded to the uncertainty of the past year.

“I think this to some extent, it's about how companies actually respond to quick changing times, which especially in today's environment is particularly important,” Zhao said. He offered Nvidia as an example. Though the company is a graphics chipmaker and there has been a global chip shortage, Nvidia has been able to manage the crisis in a way that makes employees feel both satisfied and looped in on the conversation.

“They understand what's going on, and they feel empowered to actually address the problems that the company is facing today,” he said.

Companies like Meta and Zoom have also been bumped down by more unexpected tech-adjacent companies. These are the companies nestled within other industries that have integrated more innovative technology within their work practices. Zhao uses real estate company eXp Realty as an example. The company, which is ranked No. 4 on the list this year, has a fully remote workforce and was an early adopter of the metaverse for the workplace. The company has a virtual platform for employees to interact with each other and was well-positioned for remote work when the pandemic hit.

Overall, the top companies were the ones that proved to employees they could be both nimble and flexible. “That flexibility has been critical during the pandemic, as leaders need to respond to the quick-changing environment that we're in today,” Zhao said.


Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Wednesday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.
Latest Stories