Your employees want a raise. Here’s how to talk about it.

Allison Rutledge-Parisi, SVP of People at Justworks, shares how best to talk about pay at work.

Two people in an office

There are ways to have a productive compensation conversation as an employee and as a manager.

Photo: Amy Hirschi/Unsplash

'Tis the season for holiday parties and asking for a salary bump. In the face of the labor shortage, tech workers appear to have more bargaining power than ever, and they’re using it. If you haven’t initiated or been part of a compensation conversation already this year, you might want to have one soon.

Allison Rutledge-Parisi, senior vice president of the People team at Justworks, spoke with Protocol about the best way to talk about raises: both as an employee and as a manager facilitating the conversation. Here’s what you should know.

This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.

For the managers

What can managers expect this year in terms of negotiating with their direct reports that might be different than previous years?

It is a challenging balance at this time, the market is moving very quickly. And it's moving differently for different segments of an organization. So if you are sitting in the seat that manages compensation, then first of all, hang in there. I feel collegial support for everyone who's in the same position.

That internal equity lens is critical, it is critical to not have the last in be more highly paid than the first in. And so each move that you make with someone you recently brought in from the market always causes you then to look back and look at the person who's been there for three years in a role that's similar. And that is what's so hard here. And it's a concern that individual employees don't need to carry and so they can just advocate freely for themselves as they should. You have to balance fairness and continue to value those who are longer-tenured and have contributed, and not to allow them to slip behind. And that means setting a cadence of benchmarking roles that is much more frequent than you have ever done before. I mean, we're benchmarking every six months. We have to because the market is moving so quickly — not for all segments of the population, but definitely for the tech segments.

[Also], employees do tell each other their comp. Any norms of professional discretion have eroded greatly. And so I say to my recruiting team and HR partners in my company, just assume that that offer letter is pasted on the hall.

What shouldn't managers say, especially this year? I think a lot of them are afraid of losing someone, so I'd like to hear your top list of what not to say.

Don't say anything that dismisses a person's concern. If they're concerned and you value them and you want to hang on to them, you want to give them space to have the feelings they have. It doesn't mean you need to agree with them or even do anything about it. But don't dismiss concerns.

So stuff like, “What do you mean? You just got a raise.”

What you want to do is say, “Hey, I hear you. I know that you're advocating for yourself. That's awesome. You should, but let me go talk to so-and-so.” And then you come back and say, “Hey, we looked at the benchmark, this is in the range of reasonable, but I know you want your comp to be considered. Let's continue to talk about it and see how we can set that up in the future. Right now it's not going to happen because you're at market. I appreciate you bringing it to my attention.”

And if employees bring up inflation, is there a certain way employers can prepare for that conversation as well?

Inflation is kind of a tricky thing, and so is cost of living. There's always an argument. I actually don't think it's the most persuasive argument an employee can bring, at least if you're in an environment where you look at that market benchmarking. Market benchmarking includes inflation, that's what you're looking at. I understand that employees like to say, “Hey, look at market, but don't forget to add on inflation,” but they're the same.

Is there anything else that you feel like a lot of people forget or leave out of this conversation from the employer side?

I think the key is patience and thorough preparation for any of these conversations. And if you can’t meet the employee’s concern with an actual change the employee is requesting, explain why. And if it's reasonable … keep the conversation open at a set date in the future, when you think you might be able to advance the conversation.

It is scary and tough, and managers dislike compensation conversations; they just want to get work done. So one way that people who are in charge of the whole compensation process can help is [by offering] talking points for managers that take into account each employee's point of view.

For the employees

It is really hard to find an engineer right now. When they're going into these conversations, they have a lot of leverage. What should their focus be?

Well, they should pay attention to benefits: They matter. Benefits can be highly technical and nerdy. You have to bring the discipline of paying attention to what it means … Generally speaking, in the tech industry benefits tend to be quite favorable, but you want to pay attention to that. And then negotiate your base.

Look at where the company's future is in terms of its financial health.

We talk to a lot of employees every day, and one thing I'm hearing is if their company lets them move or relocate, they almost feel like they can't ask for anything else on top of that. They might live in a market where the cost of living is a lot lower than the Bay Area. So what merit do they have to still negotiate before the end of the year?

You always negotiate. But you have to do it with professionalism. It’s not really, “Can you?” It’s, “How do you?”

You advocate with the understanding that internal equity matters … But it's good to advocate for yourself in a steady persistent way, in a way that is collaborative, meaning in a collegial way, not in an antagonistic way, and that's the best way to advocate for yourself. And generally speaking, it brings results, especially if you are a good performer.


Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Wednesday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.
Latest Stories