Workplace

Instagram is telling teens to stop doomscrolling. Will they listen?

Meta’s facing pressure from all sides to do a better job of protecting teens. Are its time management features enough?

Instagram is telling teens to stop doomscrolling. Will they listen?

One of the new Instagram updates involves partnering with young content creators to urge teens to turn on the “Take a Break” feature.

Image: Instagram

Instagram parent company Meta was hit with a wave of lawsuits last week alleging that the company knowingly hooked and harmed children on its platforms. On Tuesday, Meta is announcing a slate of time management tools on Instagram that will nudge teens to turn on “Take a Break” reminders and to stop consuming harmful content. But experts are split on whether the features will make any meaningful difference at all.

After pausing the controversial “Instagram Kids” project in late 2021, head Adam Mosseri announced an opt-in “Take a Break” feature that let users set up in-app reminders to stop scrolling after a chosen number of minutes (quietly removing the ability to set a limit lower than 30 minutes). In March, Instagram introduced new parental controls that included setting screen limits and getting notified about their kids’ activity in the app. Tuesday’s release builds on the existing features for Instagram, and follows through on Meta’s promise to place guardrails in VR.

Taking a break

One of the new Instagram updates involves partnering with young content creators to urge teens to turn on the “Take a Break” feature. The creators involved with “Take a Break” include Soy Nguyen, who posts popular “eat with me” videos, and climate activist Maya Penn. TikTok has employed a similar tool since February 2020 and has made a recent push for more screen time limits, though it’s unclear how effective it’s been in getting users away from the endless scroll (TikTok referred Protocol to its blog post when reached for comment). Dayna Geldwert, head of global policy programs at Instagram, acknowledged that it’s tricky to strike the right tone.

“How do we not compromise teens’ freedoms and autonomy?” Geldwert asked. “How do we not seem patronizing but actually express and communicate the value of turning something like this on?”

To do this, Geldwert chose creators who had already struck a chord with young people by talking about different aspects of mental health. Avoiding people who talked about these issues in an “overly earnest” or patronizing way was key, Geldwert told Protocol. If the creators succeed in getting teens to turn on “Take a Break,” the app will suggest alternate activities outside of social media.

But how authentic and genuine do “take a break” alerts feel when they’re coming from the app itself? Especially if the recipient is a contrarian teenager already dependent on said app? This dissonance might make it difficult for Instagram’s anti-Instagram messaging to land, said University of Wisconsin’s adolescent health expert Megan Moreno, referencing the Truth anti-smoking campaign.

“One of the really effective things about the Truth campaign is encouraging the teen to be a rebel by not falling in line with what the company’s telling you to do,” Moreno said. “It’s harder when the message comes from within.”

Anna Lembke, a psychiatry professor at Stanford, said some teens might be more drawn to the app after being told to take a break.

“They might help somewhat in people who aren’t already addicted, but I’m skeptical they’ll make much difference in those who are already struggling with a form of addiction to this digital content,” Lembke told Protocol. “Finding work-arounds may even add to their appeal, especially for young people, who like nothing more than to thwart authority.”

Consulting with young people themselves would help make these reminders effective, Moreno said (Instagram said it worked with teens, parents and external experts). Adolescents are the best judge of what type of humor or messaging works with their peers, she added.

Into the rabbit hole

But Instagram’s fiercest critics care most about the app’s algorithm feeding children harmful content, not about how much time children spend on the app. Irene Ly, policy counsel with Common Sense Media, wants to see Instagram committing to altering its algorithm and implementing stronger privacy controls by default. “Telling a child to take a break may shorten their time on the platform,” Ly said. “But it’s not going to help change what they’re seeing on the platform itself.”

This is the foundation of the various lawsuits filed last week, using the Facebook Papers to argue that the platform’s algorithms exacerbate mental health issues. They also take issue with Meta’s age verification process, letting kids under the age of 13 slip through the cracks.

“There’s concerns about the addictive nature of these platforms,” said Joseph VanZandt, lead attorney on the cases with Beasley Allen. “When you’re dealing with young people, you have to be incredibly careful with any product that you’re putting in front of them.”

Geldwert couldn’t comment directly on the lawsuits, but she cited Instagram’s 2019 efforts against cyberbullying as evidence of the company’s long commitment to youth safety. As for verifying account holders’ ages: “Under-13s are not allowed on Instagram, but they’re clever,” Geldwert said. Instagram has a set of AI tools that tries to detect accounts run by children, but as was the case in the Spence family’s suit against Meta, sometimes they’re easy to bypass.

As for concerns about the algorithm, Geldwert pointed to another one of Instagram’s updates: Teens will encounter nudges in Instagram Explore encouraging them to look at something new if they’ve been dwelling on any one topic for a long time. The new, suggested topic will exclude categories that are associated with “appearance comparison,” for example fitness or celebrity content. This type of “exit ramp” from a social media spiral could ease teenagers out of potentially toxic content, Moreno said. It’s a brand-new feature, so whether this will help users remains to be seen.

The pressure on Meta to implement stricter child protections will not subside anytime soon; both VanZandt and Matthew Bergman, who’s representing the Spence family, said more lawsuits are on their way. Lawmakers on both the state and federal level are pursuing legislation that might force social media companies to more strongly commit to keeping kids safe online. For now, will Instagram’s nudges be enough to pull teenagers out of the rabbit hole? Geldwert isn’t sure.

“It’s hard to make the argument and demonstrate the value proposition in a moment when a teen is already scrolling,” Geldwert said. “How can we support user education in-app, in the moment?”

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee mobile application. When we arrive at the coffee shop, we expect that our chosen brew will be on the counter a few minutes later. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as streaming data “in motion” instantaneously, you, and millions of customers, won’t have the in-the-moment experiences we all expect.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.
Policy

How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.
Fintech

How I decided to exit my startup’s original business

Bluevine got its start in factoring invoices for small businesses. CEO Eyal Lifshitz explains why it dropped that business in favor of “end-to-end banking.”

"[I]t was a realization that we can't be successful at both at the same time: You've got to choose."

Photo: Bluevine

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Bluevine got its start in fintech by offering a modern version of invoice factoring, the centuries-old practice where businesses sell off their accounts receivable for up-front cash. It’s raised $240 million in venture capital and about $700 million in total financing since its founding in 2013 by serving small businesses. But along the way, it realized it was better to focus on the checking accounts and lines of credit it provided customers than its original product. It now manages some $500 million in checking-account deposits.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Enterprise

The Roe decision could change how advertisers use location data

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restricting use of location data. But that may be changing.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on Friday, the likelihood for location data to be used against people suddenly shifted from a mostly hypothetical scenario to a realistic threat. Although location data has a variety of purposes — from helping municipalities assess how people move around cities to giving reliable driving directions — it’s the voracious appetite of digital advertisers for location information that has fueled the creation and growth of a sector selling data showing who visited specific points on the map, when, what places they came from and where they went afterwards.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing. The overturning of Roe not only puts the wide availability of location data for advertising in the spotlight, it could serve as a turning point compelling the digital ad industry to take action to limit data associated with sensitive places before the government does.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins