Intel fears workers would quit over a vaccine mandate

Intel's chief people officer told us why the chipmaker doesn't want to require the jab.

Intel logo

Instead of requiring vaccines, Intel is gearing up to require testing under a new emergency temporary standard from the Department of Labor's OSHA.

Image: Intel

Intel doesn't plan to require its employees to get vaccinated for COVID-19, fearing that it would lose employees to a mandate.

"We want to have the most positive employee relations that we can, and we want to have all of our employees safe," Intel's chief people officer, Christy Pambianchi, told Protocol. "We're trying to walk that fine line."

Retaining workers is top of mind for companies like Intel. One in seven U.S. workers — including 40% of tech workers — surveyed by in August said they were planning to quit their jobs this fall.

The risk of losing employees is Intel's "main reason" for not requiring the vaccine, Pambianchi said, though she noted the company hasn't surveyed employees about whether they would quit for this reason.

Still, Intel wants to be careful about "the tone and the way in which we want to interact with our employees," Pambianchi said. Instead of requiring the vaccine, Intel has been offering vaccinated workers $250 bonuses since August.

"Obviously, our goal would be to have as many people as possible get vaccinated," Pambianchi said.

Intel hasn't implemented COVID testing at scale and its sites remain open to masked and unvaccinated employees.

The chipmaker is a federal contractor, but said it isn't currently subject to the White House's Sept. 9 executive order requiring vaccine mandates for companies that work for the U.S. government.

That's because the executive order came out the month after Intel announced its new foundry services contract with the Department of Defense.

If that DoD contract is updated or renewed, or if Intel enters any future contracts with the federal government, at least some Intel employees will likely have to get vaccinated if they aren't already, the company acknowledged.

And as a large employer, Intel will need to comply with vaccine or testing requirements from the Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Under the not-yet-released OSHA rules, companies with 100 or more employees must require either vaccination or regular testing.

Pambianchi told Protocol that Intel has "put all the plans together" to require testing, assuming OSHA requires it, but for now, the company is waiting for the official OSHA announcement.

"There's some uncertainty on our part (about) what that will be," Pambianchi said, noting that, among other things, the company is wondering about what kinds of tests are acceptable and possible exemptions for COVID survivors who test positive for antigens.

Intel's return-to-work plan: 'Decentralized' hybrid

As more employees gear up to return to the office, Intel is embracing a hybrid approach for most workers, with exceptions for its lab and factory workers who can't work from home.

But instead of mandating a certain schedule or number of days per week in the office, Intel is leaving those decisions up to teams.

"We're going to take a pretty decentralized approach to this," said Pambianchi. "We're going to empower managers and employees to make the right decisions about when they need to be on site."

Ninety percent of Intel employees favored the hybrid model in a survey the company conducted in April, the company said.

A "small number" of employees will remain fully remote, according to Pambianchi.

And unlike a number of other large tech companies, Intel hasn't set a companywide return-to-office date, instead phasing in each site across the 50 countries where it operates.


Sealed finds a market in home decarbonization

Sealed offers homeowners the chance to save money and help protect the planet.

Sealed is convincing homeowners to look at their HVAC systems and insulation in order to save energy and money.

Photo: Gabe Souza/Portland Portland Press Herald via Getty Images

Shiny silver panels hug the walls of Andy Frank’s attic; they vaguely remind me of a child’s robot Halloween costume. A sticky-looking foam lines both the gaps in the attic’s floorboards and the roof, plugging up holes where squirrels could have once taken shelter.

The space is positively sweat-inducing, even for the mere minute I have my head poking above the trapdoor.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Now that most organizations are returning to the office, there are varying extremes – some leaders demand that employees return to the office, with some employees revolting and some rejoicing to be together again. On the other hand, some companies have closed physical offices and made remote work permanent; creating a sigh of relief for some employees and creating frustration for others.

Most of us are somewhere in between, trying our best to take a measured approach at building the right hybrid strategy tailored to company culture. Some seemingly have begun to crack the code, while the majority are grappling with the when, how, why, and who of this new hybrid work reality.

Keep Reading Show less
Nathan Coutinho

Nathan Coutinho leads Logitech's global conferencing business strategy and analyst relations. A Swiss company focused on innovation and quality, Logitech designs products and experiences that have an everyday place in people's lives.Coutinho leads strategy and execution of Logitech's video conferencing solutions, from personal solutions to highly-scalable conference rooms.Coutinho has more than 25 years of experience in the IT industry with various roles in executive leadership, consulting, engineering, marketing and technical sales.


Experts say tech companies need to prepare for the next SCOTUS decision

HR experts said companies need to be proactive about protections for contraception, privacy and LGBTQ+ rights.

Experts say tech leaders need to start thinking about future Supreme Court rulings.

Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Tech companies are still trying to prepare for a post-Roe world. But it might already be time to think about what the Supreme Court is planning next.

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade Friday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion that the court should also reconsider rulings protecting contraception and same-sex relationships, citing Griswold, Lawrence and Obergefell. If those decisions were ever overruled, it would have massive implications for everyone, but especially for employees living in states where same-sex marriage is at risk of becoming illegal without a federal shield.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at


What’s next for tech in a post-Roe world

From employee support to privacy concerns, tech companies play a critical role in what’s to come for abortion access in the U.S.

States banning abortion means that tech will play a critical role in what’s to come for abortion access in the U.S.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The end of Roe v. Wade has sent the world of tech scrambling. Many companies are now trying to quickly figure out how to protect workers in states where abortion will be banned, while also facing potential privacy and legal ramifications.

Here’s a look at tech companies’ roles and responses to the ruling. We will update this page as news and events change.

Keep Reading Show less
Alex Eichenstein

Alex Eichenstein (@alexeichenstein) is Protocol's social media editor. Previously, she managed social media and audience engagement efforts at the Center for Public Integrity. She earned an B.A. in English, women and gender studies and political science from the University of Delaware. She lives in Washington, D.C.


You’re thinking about Apple Pay Later all wrong

Apple’s “buy now, pay later” product has a distinctly different distribution strategy that means it doesn’t directly threaten Affirm, Klarna and Afterpay.

Apple Pay Later emerges as a distinctly different product than what Klarna and Affirm offer.

Image: Apple; Protocol

Apple’s entry into the “buy now, pay later” market was one of its worst-kept secrets: Analysts had been predicting the company’s rollout of a pay-later service as early as 2020. The most common read on the move was predictable: Apple was here to smash the competition. The company has a track record of jumping into new sectors late and still managing to come out on top — the iPod came out when there were tons of MP3 players on the market.

But some analysts have a starkly different view. When you look at it under the hood, Apple Pay Later emerges as a distinctly different product than what Klarna and Affirm offer, they say — and one that isn’t much of a market predator.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

Latest Stories