Cutting wages after a merger? FTC’s Lina Khan says you might be in trouble.

Lina Khan said she’s been focused on stories of workers who had their pay cut or schedules thrown into disarray by consolidation.

FTC Chair Lina Khan

FTC Chair Lina Khan is eyeing mergers.

Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Companies need to think more about how their mergers and acquisitions affect working conditions, according to FTC Chair Lina Khan.

In an interview with Protocol, Khan explained that her recent efforts to collect information on the results of consolidation, including in tech, have highlighted how M&A “can really degrade working conditions for people,” and she suggested U.S. antitrust enforcers will do more to take labor issues into account when analyzing deals.

Khan said she was particularly concerned with reduced wages or shaky schedules. She spoke after a series of listening sessions by the FTC and Justice Department antitrust section, which aimed to hear from workers, and signaled interest in trying to block deals that competition enforcers might have previously ignored because they didn’t raise prices.

One goal of the FTC and DOJ forum, Khan said, is to provide a space for everyday workers to detail their lived experiences with mergers and acquisitions. “There have been a few areas where we’ve heard particularly salient stories that compel us to make sure our merger guidelines are addressing those problems,” Khan said.

This isn’t the first time Khan has referenced labor as a metric for scrutinizing deals. In a January interview with CNBC, Khan said both the FTC and the Department of Justice are focused on protecting workers caught up in mergers. It’s not a question of whether labor is important, she said, but of how to incorporate worker protections in the FTC’s merger guidelines.

“Both agencies have been looking at the ways in which mergers in particular may lessen competition for labor and have downstream effects on workers in ways that are harmful,” Khan told CNBC. “That needs to be on our radar.” She made clear to Protocol, however, that wages and schedules had emerged as key themes as she’d heard from workers in recent months.

Khan also urged Congress to pass antitrust legislation further protecting gig workers’ right to organize in September of last year.

2022 has been a big year for M&A, starting with Microsoft buying Activision Blizzard in January for $68.7 billion. The deal was reportedly influenced by rampant workplace issues within Activision Blizzard, including misconduct allegations that led employees to call for CEO Bobby Kotick’s resignation. The never-ending Elon Musk-Twitter saga has also prompted speculation as to how such a controversial acquisition might impact Twitter employees.

It’s unclear how much mergers help or harm workers: It depends on the particular deal, and who you ask. Khan acknowledged this herself in her interview with CNBC, noting that in some cases, unions think mergers act in workers’ best interests. But previously, some M&A activity has clearly been viewed as cutting prices — and thus, good for competition — because it would eliminate jobs. Khan also referenced retrospective studies that revealed detrimental effects of mergers.

Khan and the head of DOJ’s antitrust section, Jonathan Kanter, have been pushing to hear more from workers and others in the economy, while relying less on price in analyzing competition. That’s prompted criticism from conservatives and antitrust traditionalists that the two enforcers, who are known as reformers, are abandoning the economic grounding of competition law and using it to pursue a left-wing agenda outside of the text of the statute.

As part of their efforts, Khan and Kanter have been taking in comments on revamping guidelines that tell the public and the business community what kinds of deals the enforcers tend to scrutinize more heavily and which they tend to let pass through without much investigation.


Niantic’s future hinges on mapping the metaverse

The maker of Pokémon Go is hoping the metaverse will deliver its next big break.

Niantic's new standalone messaging and social app, Campfire, is a way to get players organizing and meeting up in the real world. It launches today for select Pokémon Go players.

Image: Niantic

Pokémon Go sent Niantic to the moon. But now the San Francisco-based augmented reality developer has returned to earth, and it’s been trying to chart its way back to the stars ever since. The company yesterday announced layoffs of about 8% of its workforce (about 85 to 90 people) and canceled four projects, Bloomberg reported, signaling another disappointment for the studio that still generates about $1 billion in revenue per year from Pokémon Go.

Finding its next big hit has been Niantic’s priority for years, and the company has been coming up short. For much of the past year or so, Niantic has turned its attention to the metaverse, with hopes that its location-based mobile games, AR tech and company philosophy around fostering physical connection and outdoor exploration can help it build what it now calls the “real world metaverse.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Thursday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.


Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at

Latest Stories