Workplace

Tech companies can’t ignore Labor Day anymore

Labor Day became a national holiday long before tech companies were even a concept. Now, tech is inextricably tied to workers — and tech companies are in the middle of the fight over worker rights.

A demonstrator wears a protective mask that reads "Power To The Workers"

Some union workers at an Amazon warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama lost their union vote by more than a 2:1 ratio earlier this year.

Photo: Elijah Nouvelage/Bloomberg via Getty Images

When the International Brotherhood of Teamsters formed a union in 1903, its leaders wanted horse and buggy drivers to unite against the capricious ways that companies selected their freelance wagon drivers at shipyards. That union eventually represented almost every U.S.-based trucker and delivery driver for the next century — until the birth of Amazon fulfillment services.

No one has ever come close to a successful union drive at Amazon, but Randy Korgan, the leader of the Amazon collective organizing push at the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, thinks his union could be the first to replicate the efforts that began in 1903. Amazon's system for delivery relies partially on drivers contracted as freelancers battling for pickups outside the warehouse, just like the shipyards of old — and to Korgan, the fight is the same as it was a century ago.

"It's history repeating itself. We were here in the 1920s and 1930s. Drivers, when there were horses in front of us and reins in our hands, all of those people were waiting in line to pick up freight, we were independent contractors. Now, whether there's a horse in front of them, or a keyboard in front of them, it's the same exploitative practice," he said. The Teamsters see Amazon as an existential threat to its unionized workers and believe the company is reshaping industry standards in a way that hurts the worker rights and protections the company has secured in past union contracts.

Labor Day became a federal holiday about 100 years before anyone could conceive of a tech company. Yet to labor leaders today, the 2021 Labor Day story is inextricably a tech company story. Many of the country's largest employers and wealthiest companies are tech companies (Amazon, Google, Apple, Tesla) or tech-adjacent (Walmart, FedEx, IBM, Target), and the biggest fights over worker rights are happening within their physical (and virtual) halls. Almost every job is somehow a tech job today. The lives of grocery store cashiers, fast-food cooks and factory line workers are shaped by the technology designed to make their jobs faster. Warehouse storage and fulfillment, delivery and gig driving, data center maintenance, AI data training and cleaning, content moderation, electric-car construction, retail sales, technology repair — these jobs power the financial machine of American tech companies, and the people who work them are the ones that Labor Day was first designed to celebrate.

And while most of the tech industry is not unionized, Labor Day is inextricably tied to the American unions that led the effort for its formation and the union leaders who still see the holiday as a day to celebrate collective action and worker power. Peter Maguire, a union leader for American carpenters who is widely considered one of the founders of Labor Day, called it a day to celebrate workers "who from rude nature have delved and carved all the grandeur we behold."

Companies like Amazon and Uber say that they have created abundant, high-paying jobs that allow worker flexibility, and that union efforts would take away both the freedom and high salaries they've provided. Software engineers at Google, Apple, Facebook and other major companies often say they have no interest in forming a union, or see unions as a tool for workers in mines and factories, not those who sit behind a desk every day.


A woman pickets lettuce shipments as a lettuce truck rolls by A woman pickets lettuce shipments in 1936.Photo: Underwood Archives/Getty Images


But whether tech leaders like it or not, questions of worker rights and labor laws are now mostly a battle between tech companies and unions. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters has formed a department just focused on Amazon organizing; the Communications Workers of America and the Office and Professional Employees International Union both have branches dedicated just to organizing tech workers; Uber, Lyft, DoorDash and other gig companies are battling gig-worker advocates in California, Massachusetts and federally over whether their gig workers can be defined as employees.

"We are seeing the beginning of an explosion of activity in our industry. At CWA alone, we have over 2,000 tech workers organized, the majority of whom are bargaining right now. Even in the coming weeks, there will be something really exciting that we get to announce," Emma Kinema, an organizer for CODE-CWA (CWA's tech unionizing effort), told Protocol. "Whenever people are surveyed, it's very clear that an overwhelming majority want to have a union." (Protocol's July 2021 survey found that about half of all tech workers are interested in joining a union in their workplace).

Early union efforts have had mixed successes and failures. The Alphabet Workers Union, while not legally recognized by the National Labor Relations Board, has achieved some changes on behalf of specific workers. Earlier this year, workers at Glitch reached the first-ever collective bargaining agreement for software engineers, and workers contracted with HCL America agreed to the first-ever collective contract for Google workers. Even at notoriously secretive Apple, workers have begun speaking out about their experiences of discrimination and their anger at company policies, and some have begun a more formal collective organizing effort over the last few weeks.

But at Amazon, the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union lost its much-touted union vote at a Bessemer, Alabama facility by more than a 2:1 ratio in April, and software engineers who organized a union with CWA at Mapbox lost their vote in August.

Union organizers blame weak labor law protections for lost votes. The NLRB ruled in August that Amazon violated labor laws during the Bessemer vote, meaning that workers there will likely get a second vote (Amazon is appealing the decision). "One of the main reasons [for lack of unionization], with the rise of these companies as employers, they have entered into an environment where the law does not protect workers when they are trying to organize. Like antitrust law, it was powerful in the 1930s, but it has not been updated to deal with the fact that employers can both spend enormous sums of money to oppose unionization and also have both the legal freedom and the cultural freedom to intimidate and frighten workers from making a free choice," said Michael Zucker, the executive director of the Strategic Organizing Center, a collective of union leaders pushing for change at tech companies through research, advocacy and the investment power of their workers' pension funds.

Tech companies deny these allegations. "It's easy to predict the union will say that Amazon won this election because we intimidated employees, but that's not true," an Amazon spokesperson wrote in a statement after the Bessemer election. "Our employees heard far more anti-Amazon messages from the union, policymakers, and media outlets than they heard from us. And Amazon didn't win—our employees made the choice to vote against joining a union."

When asked what she would say to a roomful of tech leaders on Labor Day, Kinema scoffed. "I don't know if tech leaders would find Labor Day important, and I don't know if I care that they do. Labor Day just is important. Every industry, including the technology industry, is built on labor," she said. "A lot of people today have lost the meaning of the holiday — it's to celebrate those that work every single day. Every worker in America has at some point benefited from collective action, from collective movements."

Workplace

He couldn’t go to the cabin, so he brought the cabin to his cubicle

"Building forts” has long been a passion of Lucas Mundt's. Now, his employer plans to give out $200 stipends for cubicle decor.

Lucas Mundt scoured Craigslist and Facebook Marketplace to complete his masterpiece.

Photo: Mike Beckham

It took a little work to get viral cubicle-decorator Lucas Mundt on the phone. On Monday, he was taking a half-day to help a friend fix his laminate floor. Tuesday, I caught him in the middle of an officewide Pop-A-Shot basketball tournament. His employer, the Oklahoma water bottle-maker Simple Modern, was getting rid of the arcade-style hoops game, and “glorious prizes and accolades” were on the line, Mundt said. (CEO Mike Beckham was eliminated in the first round, I heard from a source.)

Why did I want to talk with Mundt? His cubicle astonished nearly 300,000 Twitter users this week after Beckham tweeted out photos of it converted into what can only be described as a lakeside cabin motif. Using leftover laminate flooring that he found on Facebook Marketplace, Mundt created the appearance of a hardwood floor, and he carefully applied contact paper to give his cubicle walls, desk and file cabinet the look of a cozy cabin. The space heater that looks like a wood stove? Purely decorative: Mundt runs hot. The two fake mounted animal heads? They’re “kind of ironic,” said Mundt, who’s never gone hunting.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.

COVID-19 accelerated what many CEOs and CTOs have struggled to do for the past decade: It forced organizations to be agile and adjust quickly to change. For all the talk about digital transformation over the past decade, when push came to shove, many organizations realized they had made far less progress than they thought.

Now with the genie of rapid change out of the bottle, we will never go back to accepting slow and steady progress from our organizations. To survive and thrive in times of disruption, you need to build a resilient, adaptable business with systems and processes that will keep you nimble for years to come. An essential part of business agility is responding to change by quickly developing new applications and adapting old ones. IT faces an unprecedented demand for new applications. According to IDC, by 2023, more than 500 million digital applications and services will be developed and deployed — the same number of apps that were developed in the last 40 years.[1]

Keep Reading Show less
Denise Broady, CMO, Appian
Denise oversees the Marketing and Communications organization where she is responsible for accelerating the marketing strategy and brand recognition across the globe. Denise has over 24+ years of experience as a change agent scaling businesses from startups, turnarounds and complex software companies. Prior to Appian, Denise worked at SAP, WorkForce Software, TopTier and Clarkston Group. She is also a two-time published author of “GRC for Dummies” and “Driven to Perform.” Denise holds a double degree in marketing and production and operations from Virginia Tech.
Fintech

Ripple’s CEO won’t apologize for taking on the SEC

“The SEC declared war on Ripple. We’re defending ourselves.”

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse isn’t apologizing for his company’s pugnacious stance with regulators.

Photo: Ripple

Ripple just bought back a huge chunk of its shares this week, which CEO Brad Garlinghouse touted as a sign of the crypto company’s momentum.

But he also used the opportunity to hit back at the agency that the crypto powerhouse considers its nemesis: the SEC.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

The Twitter account Elon Musk would pay to delete

‘I’ve put a lot of work into it, and $5k is just really not enough.’

Elon Musk considers the Twitter account a security risk.

Photoillustration: Brendan Smialowski/AFP and Getty Images Plus; Protocol

“Can you take this down? It is a security risk.”

That’s how Elon Musk opened a conversation with 19-year-old Jack Sweeney over Twitter DM last fall. He was referencing a Twitter account, called @ElonJet, which tracks the movements of his private jet around the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol, covering breaking news. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

Enterprise

Intel must spend $100B in Ohio now to avoid spending more later

Forget the politics. Here’s why Intel’s new factories in Ohio are crucial to the company’s future and its hope of regaining the chip manufacturing leadership spot.

Intel is doubling down on its own contract manufacturing business for fabless chipmakers.

Photo: Walden Kirsch/Intel Corporation

Intel’s plans to invest up to $100 billion in a new group of chip factories outside Columbus, Ohio, will have a much greater impact on the future of its manufacturing division compared to any short-term political or supply-chain concerns it might solve.

To hear President Joe Biden, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and Ohio Governor Mike DeWine tell it, the new factories — known as fabs in this world — are going to help fix inflation, make the U.S. more competitive, drive down the soaring cost of cars, ease the chip supply-chain shocks and improve U.S. national security. That’s a lot, even for one of the biggest projects in Intel’s storied history. It will be years before that capacity comes online, and whether a new chip factory in Ohio could actually solve any or all of those issues is debatable.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a Technology Reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.

Latest Stories
Bulletins