Amazon wants new delivery centers in the Bay Area. Big Labor might stop it.

Labor unions have successfully stopped plans for new Amazon delivery centers across the Bay Area. Now they’re trying to do the same in downtown San Francisco.

Line of Amazon trucks

A number of municipalities in California have started to impose moratoriums on new delivery centers.

Photo: Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images

Like most people living in big cities, San Francisco residents want free and fast delivery — the freer and the faster, the better. Amazon wants to do that for them. But the company is now facing major opposition to its plan to build a large, new fulfillment center in the Mission Bay neighborhood.

The unions that represent truckers and grocery workers see the plan for the 7th Street facility as a threat to their future.

The two groups (which include tens of thousands of workers in the Bay Area), alongside other labor activists in San Francisco, have persuaded one of the city’s most important local politicians to try to put a moratorium on the future 7th Street development, as well as any other package delivery facilities in the city. San Francisco Board of Supervisors President Shamann Walton introduced legislation on Feb. 15 that would set new interim zoning rules to put an 18-month pause on delivery facilities in the city, including the Amazon project.

While neither Amazon nor Walton’s office responded to repeated requests for comment, Jim Araby, the strategic campaigns director for the UFCW local, told Protocol that he’s confident the Board of Supervisors will support the legislation.

Amazon has historically been welcomed into communities for providing jobs and speedy package delivery, but a number of municipalities in California have started to impose moratoriums like the one proposed in San Francisco, often after the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the United Food and Commercial Workers Union lobby for the proposal. Contra Costa County set a moratorium on all new fulfillment centers in December; the city of Hayward forbade Amazon from considering two sites there; and the San Jose City Council vetoed a proposed distribution center in November. Most of the moratoriums use similar language, ordering temporary pauses on all development and expansion of delivery centers while it’s determined whether they have a measurable impact on traffic and noise, light and emissions pollution.

Despite their critical rhetoric toward Amazon, the Teamsters are actually dependent on the company for much of the business their truckers perform. Amazon contracts with UPS for many of its deliveries, and UPS workers are unionized with the Teamsters. So, as Amazon package delivery grows, UPS gets more business from Amazon, which equals more business for Teamsters’ workers. “UPS had their most profitable year in company history last year, and they have the ability to take those profits and put it back in the profits of our members, and to buy electric trucks, those are all good things. So we are not against Amazon,” Doug Bloch, the representative for more than 100,000 teamsters in California and Nevada, said.

But Amazon is the nation’s second-largest employer, and most of the new jobs it continues to add are in warehousing and delivery. No Amazon employees are unionized, meaning that workers entering those career paths at Amazon don’t interact with or join the Teamsters or the UFCW. Union fights are ongoing in Bessemer, Alabama — where Amazon won an election last year and is now facing a redo because of its illegal interference — and in Staten Island, where two warehouses may soon face their first election.

The Teamsters also voted last year to make organizing Amazon workers a national priority (though they likely won’t try to form formal unions immediately), and the plan doesn’t just include opposing new facilities in California. The union is currently lobbying for warehouse-worker transparency bills in a number of states, including Washington.

Both the Teamsters and the UFCW, which employ thousands of San Franciscans between them, said they joined together to push for all of these prohibitions and moratoriums because they want to force Amazon to include and deal with unionized labor in the planned San Francisco location. “What we’ve made clear to the politicians is, if this project goes through, and it’s a big if, it should be built union, and everybody that works in there should have the opportunity to join together in a union,” Bloch said. He also said that this is just the beginning of planned continued opposition to the company’s development goals.

The proposed Amazon center would take over a site previously used for San Francisco’s recycling and solid-waste company, Recology, meaning that the area is already zoned for industrial use. The site is controversial not just for the union workers (most of the workers at the previous Recology site were unionized), but also for local residents who are invested in the project because Recology originally proposed using the site for affordable housing units.

“The Bay Area is not Alabama. We have union jobs here, we have union density in this area,” Araby said. “We are going to use all of our tools in our toolbox to have Amazon understand that they are going to have to deal with [organized] labor in the community.”


Why CrowdStrike wants to be a broader enterprise IT player

The company, which grew from $1 billion in annual recurring revenue to $2 billion in just 18 months, is expanding deeper within the cybersecurity market and into the wider IT space as well.

CrowdStrike is well positioned at a time when CISOs are fed up with going to dozens of different vendors to meet their security needs.

Image: Protocol

CrowdStrike is finding massive traction in areas outside its core endpoint security products, setting up the company to become a major player in other key security segments such as identity protection as well as in IT categories beyond cybersecurity.

Already one of the biggest names in cybersecurity for the past decade, CrowdStrike now aspires to become a more important player in areas within the wider IT landscape such as data observability and IT operations, CrowdStrike co-founder and CEO George Kurtz told Protocol in a recent interview.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has set Oct. 28 as a date by which it hopes to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


Delta and MIT are running flight tests to fix contrails

The research team and airline are running flight tests to determine if it’s possible to avoid the climate-warming effects of contrails.

Delta and MIT just announced a partnership to test how to mitigate persistent contrails.

Photo: Gabriela Natiello/Unsplash

Contrails could be responsible for up to 2% of all global warming, and yet how they’re formed and how to mitigate them is barely understood by major airlines.

That may be changing.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at

Latest Stories