How to lay off your employees without totally blowing it

‘Deliver the news with empathy’ and other tips for layoffs that should be obvious, but are not.

Empty cubicles

Don’t be worse than The right way to lay off employees

Photo: Bill Varie/Getty Images

Layoffs are painful to execute and are of course far more painful on the receiving end. Last week, CEO Vishal Garg generated outrage when he laid off 900 employees over Zoom. He’s since apologized, but the damage might already be done: Three execs announced that they’re leaving the company, and it’s reportedly delaying its public listing.

Layoffs are never easy, but sometimes they’re necessary: Demand for a line of products or service may permanently fall, or the company may be in such dire shape that it resorts to drastic measures to keep itself afloat. But just because layoffs might be necessary doesn’t mean they have to be chaotic and they certainly don’t have to garner any public outrage.

Practice disciplined hiring

There’s usually a good business reason for having layoffs. Sometimes companies overenthusiastically hire when the company is flourishing., a digital mortgage company, has a valuation of $7.7 billion, allowing it to double down on the pandemic frenzy of home buying. But hiring without a specific strategy in mind can have consequences for a company and especially for its employees.

Honeywell CEO Dave Cote had a better strategy. He imposed hiring controls after Honeywell went through a round of painful layoffs in the early 2000s. That helped put him in a position to use furloughs instead of layoffs during the Great Recession.

Be as transparent as possible’s layoffs seemingly came out of the blue, shocking employees. The company had just received $750 million in funding, and in late November, CFO Kevin Ryan wrote that the company expected to have $1 billion in cash.

A layoff is less of a shock if people know that it’s even on the table. Whenever possible, give employees as much notice as possible. This allows them time to find a job and understand the kind of financial decisions they want to make.

In 2011, Nokia realized it would need to restructure, laying off 18,000 employees. Nokia announced the layoffs with at least six months warning. Leaders worried that most employees would quit, leaving Nokia unable to deliver its existing product pipeline. However, the majority opted to stay and brought in the same proportion of sales from new products they had before the layoffs.

Deliver the news with empathy

With our new hybrid way of working, delivering layoff news via Zoom might be the best option, or even the only option. But it can still be done with empathy.

When Airbnb had to lay off 25% of its workforce in 2020, CEO Brian Chesky thanked employees for their hard work and celebrated their talent. He emphasized that “the decisions are not a reflection of the work from the people on those teams.”

Use company resources to create a soft landing

When Airbnb laid off employees because revenue was expected to drop by 50% due to the pandemic, the company gave employees 14 weeks of base pay plus one additional week for each year at Airbnb. Airbnb also paid for up to a year of health insurance and tried to help employees find new jobs. Recruiters were reassigned to help laid off employees job search, and the company also created a talent directory, which other companies used to make hires.

In 2011, Nokia created a program to help employees find a new job within Nokia or elsewhere. They were also eligible to receive funds for additional training. The program was so successful, the Finnish government studied Nokia’s ideas as best practice for layoffs and rolled some into its legislation on what companies are required to provide laid off employees.

To the extent that it’s possible, companies should try to invest in reskilling or finding people new jobs in the organization.

Layoffs, by definition, are involuntary separations from a company for economic reasons. No matter what, there will be a certain amount of pain and acrimony. But there are still ways of executing a layoff that respects employees and gives them room to find new opportunities.


A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories