Workplace

Armed with cash, Miro’s taking on the meeting

The mission? To be not just a whiteboard, but a way of work.

Miro screenshot

Miro recently raised $400 million in its series C funding round.

Image: Miro

Whiteboard tool Miro announced today that it has joined the unicorn ranks with a $17.5 billion post-money valuation. The company recently raised $400 million in its series C funding round. As we ease into 2022, productivity apps still can’t stop making money.

Workplace tools like Miro have surged in popularity through the pandemic, and investors have taken notice. ClickUp, another productivity platform, also raised $400 million: At the time, it was one of the biggest series C funding rounds in the workplace productivity market ever. AirTable reached decacorn status at $11.7 billion last month.

Miro has kept its financial metrics under wraps since the beginning of the pandemic in April 2020, when the company was worth $725 million post-money. CEO Andrey Khusid said Miro’s never been “focused on how much the company’s valued, we were focused on the value we create for users.” But it’s hard not to shout from the rooftops about a $400 million funding round and a $17.5 billion valuation. The company reports its users have grown from 5 million to 30 million since April 2020.

Protocol chatted with Khusid about Miro’s transformation from “just a whiteboard” to a visual collaboration platform, its focus on meetings and its role in the workplace.

This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.

How is the Miro of today different from the Miro of 2011, when you helped found the company?

We started the company 10 years ago with a very simple idea of bringing the whiteboard into a browser. Along the journey, we adjusted our vision. Several years ago, we pioneered this visual collaboration platform, and the idea was to build a product that can serve users in the organization wall to wall. Every person in an organization can communicate their ideas, their thoughts visually and co-create things together.

At that time, Slack was going for wall-to-wall messaging within organizations, Microsoft Teams started to arise and penetrate the market. Zoom was building for video communication. We thought there might be a missing piece and that missing piece is visual collaboration where people co-create and collaborate in a visual way, because a picture paints 1000 words. And it's way easier for people to understand each other and to get to this "aha" moment. We call it the joy of mutual understanding when they see the same thing.

Definitely, the market has evolved. Two, three years ago CIOs of organizations were not thinking of this type of product, and now it’s definitely changed. So now the CIOs understand the direction of what their teams need.

How has your sales pitch changed?

For the first several years, Miro was adopted bottom-up. Teams picked up Miro. At that time, RealtimeBoard was the first name for Miro. We saw adoption of like tens or even hundreds of users that brought products in on their own. People were thinking about us as an online whiteboard.

But then when we started to communicate our product value top-down. On the customer side, we needed to explain to them that this is not just a whiteboard. It does way more than the regular whiteboard where you can just put sticky notes and draw something. It's a workflow platform, but the workflow is set up in a digital way. You adjust your Miro boards and your Miro account to the way your organization works.

We started to communicate that we are a visual communication platform, because that better describes our value for them than just an online whiteboard. That was the big shift.

In the last few years, as more and more people started using Miro, how have you needed to adjust the platform?

What happened with the pandemic is that some use cases required deeper work. We started to focus more on things like smart meetings, because people started to spend more time on meetings online and people hate spending time on useless meetings. We tried to change the way teams can have meetings and drive efficiency and effectiveness out of that. That's one of the areas that we deepened during the pandemic. It's not a new area, we saw workshops happening in Miro, but the magnitude of how many workshops started on Miro, how many meetings started to happen on Miro significantly increased.

What is Miro’s philosophy on meetings? What do you think the ideal meeting looks like?

This is a great question. Because no one knows. It’s an area of exploration for all tech companies who want to solve this problem.

I strongly believe that we will see a whole range of different types of meetings, from synchronous, several-day workshops to fully asynchronous collaboration. We'll see hybrid meetings where part of the team is in the same room, and the rest is remote. We'll see meetings where we'll do some virtual-reality experience or augmented-reality experience. So we'll see the whole range of different hybrid setups and different types of meetings.

We as a company need to design the product that will serve best for each of those use cases. So that's really important because it's not one-size-fits-all. You can't just use Zoom for everything that you need to do, or Miro in its current development. We need to develop our platform and develop the platforms in general to serve all different needs.

When you need to solve a complex problem with a set of people, it's more time-consuming. You really need to take people through some type of meeting framework. If you just sit on Zoom, and there are like eight, 10, 20 people in the room and everyone's sharing their opinion, it’s hard to get to some decision. In the physical world, we can imagine that someone will jump out of the table and take a marker and start to visualize what they propose. In the digital world, we don't have that type of behavior. How we think it can be solved is when you have a framework for the meeting.

Everyone will have the same voice because when you share your ideas through sticky notes or through other visual objects, introverts, extroverts, they're all in the same kind of setup. They all have the same voice, so it drives more inclusivity and also helps people to move faster from one stage of the decision to another stage. We’re trying to provide teams with the right set of templates and frameworks that they can use to get decisions faster, and to drive better quality of their decisions.

How do you envision Miro’s future? Where does it fit in within the crowded productivity space?

I don't think there will be one platform, one tool that solves for everything. I think there are different problems and different use cases that people solve for on different platforms. And I believe that we need to do our best work in the use cases that people choose us for.

So, we discussed this, content-first meetings. This is the area where we need to be the best-of-class platform. Or, for example, people design product requirements in Miro, so we need to be the best-in-class platform for developing product requirements.

I strongly believe that you need to focus on your customers who already have seen the value and then deepen that value rather than try to be everything for everyone. That’s my view. At the same time, in the marketplace, there will be suites of products that do a little bit of everything. There is a place for both and it depends on the customer. Some customers have preference for suites; some customers have preference for best-in-class products in their space.

China

Why does China's '996' overtime culture persist?

A Tencent worker’s open criticism shows why this work schedule is hard to change in Chinese tech.

Excessive overtime is one of the plights Chinese workers are grappling with across sectors.

Photo: VCG/VCG via Getty Images

Workers were skeptical when Chinese Big Tech called off its notorious and prevalent overtime policy: “996,” a 12-hour, six-day work schedule. They were right to be: A recent incident at gaming and social media giant Tencent proves that a deep-rooted overtime culture is hard to change, new policy or not.

Defiant Tencent worker Zhang Yifei, who openly challenged the company’s overtime culture, reignited wide discussion of the touchy topic this week. What triggered Zhang's criticism, according to his own account, was his team’s positive attitude toward overtime. His team, which falls under WeCom — a business communication and office collaboration tool similar to Slack — announced its in-house Breakthrough Awards. The judges’ comments to one winner highly praised them for logging “over 20 hours of intense work nonstop,” to help meet the deadline for launching a marketing page.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu covers China's tech industry.

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.
Entertainment

Spoiler alert: We’re already in the beta-metaverse

300 million people use metaverse-like platforms — Fortnite, Roblox and Minecraft — every month. That equals the total user base of the internet in 1999.

A lot of us are using platforms that can be considered metaverse prototypes.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

What does it take to build the metaverse? What building blocks do we need, how can companies ensure that the metaverse is going to be inclusive, and how do we know that we have arrived in the 'verse?

This week, we convened a panel of experts for Protocol Entertainment’s first virtual live event, including Epic Games Unreal Engine VP and GM Marc Petit, Oasis Consortium co-founder and President Tiffany Xingyu Wang and Emerge co-founder and CEO Sly Lee.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Enterprise

Lyin’ AI: OpenAI launches new language model despite toxic tendencies

Research company OpenAI says this year’s language model is less toxic than GPT-3. But the new default, InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

The new default, called InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

Illustration: Pixabay; Protocol

OpenAI knows its text generators have had their fair share of problems. Now the research company has shifted to a new deep-learning model it says works better to produce “fewer toxic outputs” than GPT-3, its flawed but widely-used system.

Starting Thursday, a new model called InstructGPT will be the default technology served up through OpenAI’s API, which delivers foundational AI into all sorts of chatbots, automatic writing tools and other text-based applications. Consider the new system, which has been in beta testing for the past year, to be a work in progress toward an automatic text generator that OpenAI hopes is closer to what humans actually want.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Policy

AI bias is rampant. Bug bounties could help catch it.

A Q&A with cybersecurity guru Camille François about her new research on bug bounties, and the hope that they could help rein in AI harms.

Developers of harmful AI need to know "how ugly their baby is," Camille François said.

Illustration: clarote

The 1990s might have a lot to teach us about how we should tackle harm from artificial intelligence in the 2020s.

Back then, some companies found they could actually make themselves safer by incentivizing the work of independent “white hat” security researchers who would hunt for issues and disclose them in a process that looked a lot like hacking with guardrails. That’s how the practice of bug bounties became a cornerstone of cybersecurity today.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories
Bulletins