Who’s taking notes in your meeting? Here's how tasks get unfairly distributed at work.

For marginalized employees, doing “glamour work” as opposed to office housework is the key to succeeding in the workplace.

“Seen, Heard, and Paid: The New Work Rules for the Marginalized” by Alan Henry.

"Dissecting who gets what work, why, and how both employees and managers can assign work more fairly is essential to making sure everyone has the opportunity to bring their fullest selves to their jobs."

Image: Rodale; Protocol

The following is an excerpt from “Seen, Heard, and Paid: The New Work Rules for the Marginalized” by Alan Henry. The book is available June 7.

RULE 5: Office Housework Will Never Get You Ahead (Getting the glamour work)

Think about your previous jobs. Have you ever had someone who everyone in your organization looked up to as the “office mom”? Was it you? Maybe that person scheduled the meetings, organized the calendars, ordered lunch for those meetings, took notes or minutes, and sent out agendas before and after those gatherings. Maybe they kept the supply closet stocked, kept pain medication on hand in case a coworker needed it, or knew the best place to get the good coffee. Maybe it was this individual’s job to know and do all these things, and the person was an administrative assistant for your team. But maybe — and, sometimes, more likely — they were a team member who just picked up those additional responsibilities on top of the work they were already doing.

Now think about those previous jobs again. Odds are, you never had an “office dad,” whose job it was to do all those same things, unless he really was an administrative assistant. Before we go too much further, think about that for a moment. Why is it so often the women on your team who are responsible for making sure guests have access to the Wi-Fi, for taking notes during the team meeting, or for coming in early to bring bagels and coffee? This story may be familiar to some of you, and it has happened to more people than I can count, especially women of color and other women in the workplace.

Ruchika Tulshyan, CEO of Candour, has written extensively about the dichotomy between office housework and glamour work. She explained why you’ve probably never seen an office dad. It is, she told me, “very much due to prevailing gender expectations of women being helpful and nurturing. It’s harmful and unnecessary; we need managers to keep an eye out for office housework and ensure it’s being assigned fairly, not along gender and racial lines.” That kind of housework — the note taking, mass emailing, snack getting, calendar managing, and so forth — is all work that keeps the team running smoothly, so someone needs to do it. And it’s still seen as women’s work.

Joan C. Williams and Marina Multhaup, writing in the Harvard Business Review about research from the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California, are credited for coming up with the term “office housework” to refer to the kind of admin work that “keeps things moving forward, like taking notes or finding a time everyone can meet” and “work that’s important but undervalued, like initiating new processes or keeping track of contracts.” And, of course, office housework is work that needs to be done but doesn’t make the company money. And because it is seldom directly tied to company goals or performance indicators, it’s “far less likely to result in a promotion than chairing an innovation or digital transformation committee,” say Williams and Multhaup.

Contrast office housework with work that earns people promotions, is noticed by management, and makes the company money. Williams and Multhaup call that kind of work “glamour work” and describe it in Harvard Business Review as work that “gives you the opportunity to stretch your skills with a new challenge and can lead to your next promotion. It’s the project for a major client, the opportunity to build out a new team, or the chance to represent the company at an industry conference.” In other words, glamour work is work you want to spend your time doing. It’s the stuff you want to do, as opposed to the stuff you have to do, and it’s the work that truly deserves your time.

I contacted Williams to talk about the concept of office housework versus glamour work, and she explained that it was actually her daughter’s idea. “My daughter and I coined the term office housework in 2014,” she said. “Little did I know that seven years later, male reporters would be calling me and knowing all about it. I was going like, ‘Well, that’s successful dissemination.’”

Glamour work contributes to reaching superstar status

So in short, office housework may be the things that have to get done, but that work is often in the background, away from the eyes of decision makers. And while it may keep the organization or team working smoothly toward the group’s collective goals, office housework is highly unlikely to be the kind of thing brought up at your next performance review. Nor will it earn you accolades from your colleagues (at least, not until you leave the job, and everyone says that they don’t know how they’ll get by without you).

Glamour work, on the other hand, gets you promoted and earns you fame either on your team or across the company and even potential appreciation across your whole industry as a subject-matter expert. It turns individual contributors into valued “superstar” workers with more job security than others, because managers will actively notice the superstars’ absence and will have to fill the hole they leave behind if they exit the company or are poached by a competitor.

Williams and Multhaup’s research also indicates that women and workers of color are often assigned the office housework. Unfortunately, scheduling appointments, drafting memos, and taking care of the collective needs of the team always seem to fall to the women team members, including women of color and younger women. Meanwhile, white and male coworkers are often given (or assume for themselves) the glamour work, regardless of whether their qualifications or desires are appropriate. So dissecting who gets what work, why, and how both employees and managers can assign work more fairly is essential to making sure everyone has the opportunity to bring their fullest selves to their jobs.

Adapted from SEEN, HEARD, AND PAID copyright © 2022 by Alan Henry. Used by permission of Rodale Books, an imprint of the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Penguin Random House LLC, New York. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.


Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.

How I decided to exit my startup’s original business

Bluevine got its start in factoring invoices for small businesses. CEO Eyal Lifshitz explains why it dropped that business in favor of “end-to-end banking.”

"[I]t was a realization that we can't be successful at both at the same time: You've got to choose."

Photo: Bluevine

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Bluevine got its start in fintech by offering a modern version of invoice factoring, the centuries-old practice where businesses sell off their accounts receivable for up-front cash. It’s raised $240 million in venture capital and about $700 million in total financing since its founding in 2013 by serving small businesses. But along the way, it realized it was better to focus on the checking accounts and lines of credit it provided customers than its original product. It now manages some $500 million in checking-account deposits.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at
Latest Stories