Workplace

1:1 meetings are eating your workweek

The calendar app Reclaim.ai found that the average professional now spends 21.5 hours a week in meetings.

Calendar with frequent meetings

Meetings now occupy more than half the workweek.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/ Protocol

Three meetings a day: Sounds quaint, doesn't it? In February 2020 — just before the COVID-19 pandemic — that's how the typical professional's calendar looked.

By last month, that number had swelled to five meetings per day, according to a new report from the "smart calendar" startup Reclaim.ai that looked at anonymized, aggregated calendar data from over 15,000 professionals.

"People are longing for that kind of connection, and they're longing for that kind of touchpoint with their coworkers," Reclaim.ai co-founder Henry Shapiro told Protocol. "But it doesn't change some of the physics of time and the physics of the work they need to get done."

Meetings now occupy more than half the workweek, with the average professional spending 21.5 hours a week in meetings. Before the pandemic, that number was just 14.2 hours a week.

One-on-ones are taking over the calendar

In particular, one-on-one meetings have been driving this pandemic meeting inflation, accounting for 79.6% of new meetings, Reclaim.ai found.

Last month, the average professional had 5.6 one-on-one meetings per week, up from 0.9 in February 2020. Every week, many of us now have 4.7 more one-on-ones than before the pandemic.

That's a more than 500% increase — leading one-on-ones to eat up 8.9% of the typical professional's calendar, according to Reclaim.ai's research.

Why are knowledge workers having so many more one-on-one meetings?

They can be a stand-in for the kinds of spontaneous check-ins that offices foster — which can take place while grabbing lunch together or meeting at the water cooler, Reclaim.ai co-founder Patrick Lightbody told Protocol. Those aren't easily replaced by scheduled meetings or instant messages.

"People are trying to recreate those [spontaneous interactions] in various ways, but some of the tooling that they have is fairly limited," Lightbody said. "People are dealing with a lot of beeps and knobs and various attention-seeking interruptions."

How to control one-on-ones

Some knowledge workers are doing more "five-minute calls" as opposed to scheduled one-on-ones, which typically last around 43 minutes, according to Lightbody.

"These unprompted, unscheduled, five- [or] 10-minute calls where you work through something and just casually catch up — that's helped a lot," Lightbody said.

Cutting out one-on-ones may have an outsized effect on shortening the workday, which grew from 7.5 hours in February 2020 to 8.9 hours in October 2021.

And Reclaim.ai has built a feature to automatically reschedule meetings that have been canceled. More than 42% of one-on-ones are rescheduled every week and 29.6% are canceled, its study found.

The feature, called Smart 1:1s, takes recurring meetings that would typically be scheduled weekly or biweekly and instead finds times at that approximate cadence — maybe every five days or eight days rather than strictly every week — that work for attendees.

For busy people, manually rescheduling meetings can lead to a "domino effect" of having to move obligations around on the calendar and wasting time finding a new slot that works for everyone, according to Shapiro.

"A big part of it is not just taking off the burden of scheduling and rescheduling," Shapiro said. "It's also getting ahead of your schedule."

Meetings could get even more out of control

But in the coming years, as companies transition to meeting in a hybrid workplace, Lightbody expects even more challenges when it comes to controlling meeting creep.

Lightbody has already been hearing reports of people who head into the office only to find the person they were set to meet with isn't there.

"It's like, 'Well, that was the worst of both worlds. It was like working from home, but I had to commute,'" Lightbody said. "I think there's going to be a lot of demands on coordination."

Climate

Sealed finds a market in home decarbonization

Sealed offers homeowners the chance to save money and help protect the planet.

Sealed is convincing homeowners to look at their HVAC systems and insulation in order to save energy and money.

Photo: Gabe Souza/Portland Portland Press Herald via Getty Images

Shiny silver panels hug the walls of Andy Frank’s attic; they vaguely remind me of a child’s robot Halloween costume. A sticky-looking foam lines both the gaps in the attic’s floorboards and the roof, plugging up holes where squirrels could have once taken shelter.

The space is positively sweat-inducing, even for the mere minute I have my head poking above the trapdoor.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Now that most organizations are returning to the office, there are varying extremes – some leaders demand that employees return to the office, with some employees revolting and some rejoicing to be together again. On the other hand, some companies have closed physical offices and made remote work permanent; creating a sigh of relief for some employees and creating frustration for others.

Most of us are somewhere in between, trying our best to take a measured approach at building the right hybrid strategy tailored to company culture. Some seemingly have begun to crack the code, while the majority are grappling with the when, how, why, and who of this new hybrid work reality.

Keep Reading Show less
Nathan Coutinho

Nathan Coutinho leads Logitech's global conferencing business strategy and analyst relations. A Swiss company focused on innovation and quality, Logitech designs products and experiences that have an everyday place in people's lives.Coutinho leads strategy and execution of Logitech's video conferencing solutions, from personal solutions to highly-scalable conference rooms.Coutinho has more than 25 years of experience in the IT industry with various roles in executive leadership, consulting, engineering, marketing and technical sales.

Workplace

Experts say tech companies need to prepare for the next SCOTUS decision

HR experts said companies need to be proactive about protections for contraception, privacy and LGBTQ+ rights.

Experts say tech leaders need to start thinking about future Supreme Court rulings.

Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Tech companies are still trying to prepare for a post-Roe world. But it might already be time to think about what the Supreme Court is planning next.

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade Friday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion that the court should also reconsider rulings protecting contraception and same-sex relationships, citing Griswold, Lawrence and Obergefell. If those decisions were ever overruled, it would have massive implications for everyone, but especially for employees living in states where same-sex marriage is at risk of becoming illegal without a federal shield.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Policy

What’s next for tech in a post-Roe world

From employee support to privacy concerns, tech companies play a critical role in what’s to come for abortion access in the U.S.

States banning abortion means that tech will play a critical role in what’s to come for abortion access in the U.S.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The end of Roe v. Wade has sent the world of tech scrambling. Many companies are now trying to quickly figure out how to protect workers in states where abortion will be banned, while also facing potential privacy and legal ramifications.


Here’s a look at tech companies’ roles and responses to the ruling. We will update this page as news and events change.

Keep Reading Show less
Alex Eichenstein

Alex Eichenstein (@alexeichenstein) is Protocol's social media editor. Previously, she managed social media and audience engagement efforts at the Center for Public Integrity. She earned an B.A. in English, women and gender studies and political science from the University of Delaware. She lives in Washington, D.C.

Fintech

You’re thinking about Apple Pay Later all wrong

Apple’s “buy now, pay later” product has a distinctly different distribution strategy that means it doesn’t directly threaten Affirm, Klarna and Afterpay.

Apple Pay Later emerges as a distinctly different product than what Klarna and Affirm offer.

Image: Apple; Protocol

Apple’s entry into the “buy now, pay later” market was one of its worst-kept secrets: Analysts had been predicting the company’s rollout of a pay-later service as early as 2020. The most common read on the move was predictable: Apple was here to smash the competition. The company has a track record of jumping into new sectors late and still managing to come out on top — the iPod came out when there were tons of MP3 players on the market.

But some analysts have a starkly different view. When you look at it under the hood, Apple Pay Later emerges as a distinctly different product than what Klarna and Affirm offer, they say — and one that isn’t much of a market predator.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

Latest Stories
Bulletins