Inside the world’s first Pay Gap Store: What you pay depends on your race and gender

Offset the pay gap with a mug!

screenshot of Pay Gap Store

Profits from the Pay Gap Store will be donated to a relevant charity.

Screenshot: Pay Gap Store

This story is part of our Salary Series, where we take a deep dive into the world of pay: how it's set, how it's changing and what's next. Read the rest of the series.

Everyone’s heard the statistics: As of 2020, women earned 84% of what men earned. Meanwhile, white men continue to out-earn Black and Hispanic men, as well as all groups of women.

Despite all the advocacy and legislation aimed at addressing it, the gender and racial pay gap in the U.S. persists.

What if we tried to address the gap from a different angle? That’s the premise of a new marketing campaign by HR compliance software company Trusaic, which recently launched what it claims is the world’s first Pay Gap Store.

The concept is simple: What you pay depends on your gender and race. Prices for items in the store are calculated using U.S. census data collected from the 2019 American Community Survey. Trusaic took the difference between the average wage earned by the selected class and the average wage of the highest-paid class, dividing that figure by the highest paid class’ wages. The resulting percentage is what people call the pay gap.

At the Pay Gap Store, that percentage is the discount applied to the items for sale, which include T-shirts, tote bags and mugs. The highest earners — Asian men — pay the most, and the lowest-paid — Hispanic women — pay the least. A T-shirt that would cost an Asian man $34.99 at the store would cost a Hispanic woman $17.14, representing the 51% pay gap between those two groups.

Profits from the Pay Gap Store will be donated to a relevant charity fighting for equal pay, which the company is currently deciding on. Some candidates include the National Women’s Law Center as well as Equal Rights Advocates, which has an Equal Pay Today campaign.

A caveat here is that, legally, Trusaic isn’t allowed to charge people differently based on race and gender, which is why there's a bold disclaimer at the bottom of the site: “Our Pay Gap Store SUGGESTS what a fair price is for you, based on your answers to our questions about your gender and race/ethnicity, but in the end, it’s up to you — and your conscience — whether you pay the higher price suggested for you or the lowest price available, which you can still choose if you prefer.”

This kind of choose-what-you-pay setup is relatively rare in ecommerce, with the most notable example being popular direct-to-consumer brand Everlane, whose annual “Choose What You Pay” sale is part of the retailer’s whole radical supply chain transparency edict.

Matt Gotchy is Trusaic’s VP of Marketing, and he spoke to Protocol about the Pay Gap Store. He compared the idea behind the store to carbon offsets, but rather than offsetting carbon, you’re offsetting the pay gap through your purchase.

Gotchy is not under any illusions. He’s aware that selling merch on an online store is not going to move the needle in any meaningful way when it comes to pay equity. Trusaic hasn’t spent much time or effort marketing the store, with one big recent order consisting of $200 worth of shirts for “several different race and gender combinations.”

True change, in his view, would require legislation, which Trusaic has worked with lobbyists to promote on Capitol Hill. It's a big fan of California’s SB 973, a new state law that requires private employers with 100 or more employees to file an annual report with the EEOC that breaks down pay data by job category, race, sex and ethnicity, as well as Illinois’ SB 1480, which is similar. While the U.S. is inching toward state-by-state decisions on pay transparency, the U.K. has had gender pay-gap reporting requirements for all companies over 250 in headcount since 2017.

As a regulatory-compliance software company, Trusaic has gathered a lot of pay-gap reporting data on its own, including a 2021 analysis of 500 companies in the state of California, which identified a $46 billion annual gender pay gap and $61 billion race/ethnicity annual pay gap for workers across the state.

For companies that are willing (or compelled by law) to put in the work and uncover pay gaps, Gotchy suggested starting with a pay-equity audit. Here’s how to conduct one, according to experts that spoke to Protocol.

“Be proactive,” he said, pointing to safe harbors that certain states have for companies that conduct audits. These would allow damages in the case of employee lawsuits to be more limited than they would be if these companies hadn’t conducted the audits in the first place.

Ultimately, the two instances pay inequity is created occur when people get hired and when they get promoted, Gotchy said, and addressing both sources “makes a real difference in people’s lives.”

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.

How I decided to exit my startup’s original business

Bluevine got its start in factoring invoices for small businesses. CEO Eyal Lifshitz explains why it dropped that business in favor of “end-to-end banking.”

"[I]t was a realization that we can't be successful at both at the same time: You've got to choose."

Photo: Bluevine

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Bluevine got its start in fintech by offering a modern version of invoice factoring, the centuries-old practice where businesses sell off their accounts receivable for up-front cash. It’s raised $240 million in venture capital and about $700 million in total financing since its founding in 2013 by serving small businesses. But along the way, it realized it was better to focus on the checking accounts and lines of credit it provided customers than its original product. It now manages some $500 million in checking-account deposits.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at

The Roe decision could change how advertisers use location data

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restricting use of location data. But that may be changing.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on Friday, the likelihood for location data to be used against people suddenly shifted from a mostly hypothetical scenario to a realistic threat. Although location data has a variety of purposes — from helping municipalities assess how people move around cities to giving reliable driving directions — it’s the voracious appetite of digital advertisers for location information that has fueled the creation and growth of a sector selling data showing who visited specific points on the map, when, what places they came from and where they went afterwards.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing. The overturning of Roe not only puts the wide availability of location data for advertising in the spotlight, it could serve as a turning point compelling the digital ad industry to take action to limit data associated with sensitive places before the government does.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories