Performance reviews suck. These tech companies are trying to make them better.

Slack integrations and keywords and AI, oh my!

An illustration of a performance review on a clipboard.

Time will tell how smart HR technology has the potential to be, or how smart users want it to be.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Arguably nothing elicits more of a collective groan at work than performance review season. Managers hate giving them. Employees theoretically want them, but dread receiving them. It's as clear how much time and effort they take as it is unclear how useful formal performance reviews actually are in measuring and evaluating performance.

It's an arena ripe for disruption.

A flurry of startups are attempting just that and raising a lot of money in the process.

Global year-to-date VC investment into HR tech is approaching $12 billion, according to an August report from WorkTech. One leading HR software company, Lattice, just announced its expansion to Europe and an investment of $110 million in the UK. Other more nascent startups like ChartHop and OnLoop are attracting millions from top-tier investors.

So what's wrong with performance reviews?

Performance reviews are performed by people, and "people are biased," said Dr. Evelyn Carter, a managing director at Paradigm, a San-Francisco-based strategy firm that works with tech companies on their DEI goals.

One example is what Dr. Carter refers to as the "prove it again" trap: Research shows that marginalized groups like women and people of color tend to be evaluated on the results they deliver — can they "prove it again?" — while dominant groups are evaluated based on pure potential.

So how are these new HR tools attempting to make performance reviews suck less, and how can managers circumvent their own biases?

Establish a consistent set of metrics by which to evaluate people.

And make sure they're tailored to the job and level. You don't necessarily want to judge an engineer by the same standards as an operations person, said Carter.

Having clear metrics for evaluating success also helps people see what they need to do to get promoted, according to Lattice CEO and Co-Founder Jack Altman. Lattice, for example, has a section called "Competencies," which allows companies to articulate the expectations of each role, as well as the skills required for promotion. Those competencies are then pulled into the performance review form, and managers can rate how well the employee has fulfilled each one.

Up the cadence of reviews. Take notes all the time.

The biggest problem with traditional performance reviews is how infrequently they happen, which can introduce recency bias, according to Ian White, founder and CEO/CTO of ChartHop, an org chart startup that has a performance review component.

Most HR experts today recommend shifting from the annual review cycle to at least twice a year, or even quarterly. And they suggest supplementing those reviews with weekly one-on-one meetings to go over goals and feedback. That way, managers can keep regular tabs on how their reports are doing, rather than relying on memory to write a review once a year.

Taking the stress out of writing performance reviews is a major premise of OnLoop, a new mobile-first performance review app that aims to make the "data collection process more bite-sized and approachable," according to CEO and Co-Founder Projjal Ghatak.

OnLoop users are encouraged to evaluate team members once a week using "captures" in three potential categories: "celebrate," "improve" or "goal." One of the biggest issues with giving feedback, said Ghatak, is finding the language to describe a person or encounter, which OnLoop bypasses by prompting users to select relevant "tags" to input in each capture, like "growth mindset," "authentic self" or "subject matter expertise."

Collect feedback and data points from all directions, and automate it.

Remember the pain of writing extemporaneously about someone once a year with no other context? Another way to counter that, according to Altman, is through clever Slack integrations. Lattice can take compliments from a company's existing #praise channel, for example, and automatically feed them to its platform, adding another point of reference for managers while they're writing their reviews.

Lattice isn't the only company dabbling in off-platform integrations to streamline performance reviews. Betterworks, a performance-management system focused on OKRs and goals, has an even more literal feature that integrates project-management tools like Asana or Jira into an employee's "performance snapshot."

For example, a marketing manager might have an objective of revamping a website, which might be measured in a series of assigned Asana tickets or tasks. When that employee completes one ticket out of 10, that objective would display a 10% completion on Betterworks, explained Dennis Villahermosa, the company's senior director of product marketing.

Consider performance ratings. Or don't. They're controversial.

Having objective criteria by which to evaluate people as well as a rubric for what success looks like in each role is important from a company inclusion perspective, according to most DEI experts.

Having that numeric score also allows companies to compare performance ratings across the board and analyze them for potential areas of bias. For example, if more female employees received lower ratings across a department than male employees, perhaps there's an issue there, explained White.

Some companies, like Zenefits, are moving away from issuing ratings. "Where ratings get tricky is they end up being opinionated and subjective even in all of that effort to try to avoid being subjective," said Zenefits' VP of People Operations Danny Speros.

Most agree that the worst thing to do is to give stack rankings, pitting employees against each other as Microsoft notoriously used to do.

Actually use performance reviews to help make promotion and raise decisions fair.

Doing that is easier said than done, especially when your performance review platform isn't integrated into the rest of your HR management systems. Integrating these systems is ChartHop's whole selling point.

The platform allows executives to "slice and dice" their employee data and compare performance ratings against compensation and promotion data, which allows for more agility and continuous planning, according to White. If a person has three outstanding performance ratings in a row but hasn't received a raise in that same period, maybe they deserve a bigger equity refresh, he explained.

Do you want AI to get involved? Maybe.

At the end of the day, managers are still responsible for writing summaries of how their direct reports are doing and aligning with their goals. Or are they? OnLoop's loftiest goal is trying to simplify that process by integrating all the captures — the kudos, the constructive feedback, the self-reflections — into an AI-generated natural language summary that managers can then use to write their employee reviews.

They're not alone. Part of Betterworks' future plan also includes developing "intelligence engines" that would make suggestions to managers informed by performance data, said Villahermosa.

Time will tell how smart HR technology has the potential to be, or how smart users want it to be. What's clear is that, as with all AI systems, if the humans that create the tool are biased, the tool may very well end up biased too.

In other words: Managers, it's still on you.


Is it legal to fire someone while they’re on parental leave?

Twitter is in chaos right now. But that’s still not a good reason to fire someone while they’re on parental leave.

Kayvon Beykpour was terminated during his parental leave.

Screenshot: Twitter

This week, Twitter fired the company’s head of Consumer, Kayvon Beykpour, in the latest shakeup related to the Elon Musk deal.

According to Beykpour’s tweet, the senior executive was on paternity leave after welcoming a daughter last month. This brings up a lot of questions around the ethics — and legality — of firing someone while they’re on parental leave.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less

Crypto is crumbling, and DeFi hacks are getting worse

The amount of crypto stolen in the first quarter of 2022 has already surpassed criminal hackers’ 2021 haul. There aren’t any easy fixes.

The biggest hacks of 2022 were carried out by attackers spotting vulnerabilities in smart contracts and protocols, especially in cross-chain bridges and flash loan protocols.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Until recently, DeFi seemed like it was on an exponential trajectory upwards. With the collective value of crypto peaking near $3 trillion, hackers saw a big opportunity. The only thing that may slow them down is the precipitous drop in the value of the tokens they’re going after.

DeFi hacks have been getting worse and worse, with no clear solutions in sight. According to a recent report by blockchain security firm PeckShield, the amount of money netted from DeFi hacks in the first four months of 2022, $1.57 billion, has already surpassed the amount netted in all of 2021, $1.55 billion. A report by Chainalysis found a similar trend, with the hacker haul in the first three months of 2022 exceeding a record set in the third quarter of 2021.

Keep Reading Show less
Lindsey Choo
Lindsey Choo is a San Francisco-based reporter covering fintech. She is a graduate of UC San Diego, where she double majored in communications and political science. She has previously covered healthcare issues for the Center for Healthy Aging and was a senior staff writer for The UCSD Guardian. She can be reached at

Privacy by Design laws will kill your data pipelines

The legislation could make old data pipelines more trouble than they’re worth.

Data pipelines have become so unwieldy that companies might not even know if they are complying with regulations.

Image: Andriy Onufriyenko/Getty Images

A car is totaled when the cost to repair it exceeds its total value. By that logic, Privacy by Design legislation could soon be totaling data pipelines at some of the most powerful tech companies.

Those pipelines were developed well before the advent of more robust user privacy laws, such as the European Union’s GDPR (2018) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (2020). Their foundational architectures were therefore designed without certain privacy-preserving principals in mind, including k-anonymity and differential privacy.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at


Why AI-powered ransomware could be 'terrifying'

Hiring AI experts to automate ransomware could be the next step for well-endowed ransomware groups that are seeking to scale up their attacks.

Ransomware gangs don’t have AI ransomware. At least not yet.

Photo: Max Duzij/Unsplash

In the perpetual battle between cybercriminals and defenders, the latter have always had one largely unchallenged advantage: The use of AI and machine learning allows them to automate a lot of what they do, especially around detecting and responding to attacks. This leg-up hasn't been nearly enough to keep ransomware at bay, but it has still been far more than what cybercriminals have ever been able to muster in terms of AI and automation.

That’s because deploying AI-powered ransomware would require AI expertise. And the ransomware gangs don’t have it. At least not yet.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at

Latest Stories