Are you sharing your pronouns at work? You should.

Corporate leaders can signal their values through something as simple as sharing their pronouns.

Nametag for pronouns

When everyone shares their pronouns in a workplace, it normalizes the idea that gender identity shouldn’t be assumed.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

“My name is __. And my pronouns are __.”

If you aren’t starting your introductory meetings with that phrase, it may be time to consider doing so now, according to workplace inclusion experts.

As tech companies struggle with recruitment and retention, especially of underrepresented groups, one thing that continues to elude corporate leaders is how to create inclusive workplaces for people of all gender identities. One simple but effective way: setting a culture around disclosing pronouns at work.

About a quarter of Americans know someone who uses gender-neutral pronouns like “they,” 8% more than in 2018, according to a 2021 Pew Research Center survey. When everyone shares their pronouns in a workplace, it normalizes the idea that a person’s gender identity shouldn’t be assumed and that they might not fit within the gender binary, according to Aubrey Blanche, Culture Amp’s global head of Equitable Design & Impact.

Blanche is a big fan of what she calls “tech-enabled disclosure,” which she feels is “subtle and simple but sets the tone for an organization.” Managers and company leaders can start by encouraging employees to change their settings on Slack, Zoom, LinkedIn and other commonly-used productivity tools to display their pronouns, for example. Employers with standard email signature templates can also make sure to include a section for pronouns.

When you’re “designing the workplace for the most marginalized, you end up raising all boats,” Blanche told Protocol. “At a very basic level, misgendering someone is an invalidation of someone’s humanity. To say, ‘I don’t see you,' is very powerful and negative to someone.”

For HR executives, there’s also the growing business case to consider. In the age of the Great Resignation, studies show that adopting more inclusive language is good for retention. According to a 2014 report from the Human Rights Coalition, 26% of LGBTQ+ employees surveyed stayed in a job because the environment was accepting. On the flip side, 9% left because their workplace wasn’t.

Zoom call prompting for pronouns A Zoom feature allows users to disclose or not disclose their pronouns on all or certain calls. Image: Zoom

Experts agree that it helps the culture-setting even more when the message is coming from the top. If a CEO introduces themselves with their gender pronouns, that signals both internally and externally that their organization is safe for transgender and nonbinary employees, for example.

Pronoun disclosures should happen as early as the employee recruiting process, according to Chris Wood, executive director and co-founder of LGBT Tech. Keisha Williams, the director of the HRC’s Workplace Equality Program, recommends that recruiters and managers ask for and share pronouns as early as the job interview and onboarding process.

Companies that don’t make pronoun-sharing a part of their business practices are going to get left behind, said Williams, who helps run the HRC’s Corporate Equality Index, a national benchmarking tool that tracks companies’ commitments to LGBTQ+ employees. The most recent index found that 56% of the 1,142 companies surveyed have gender transition guidelines with information around pronoun usage.

Workplace tools are also making it easier for companies to integrate pronoun disclosures into their day-to-day operations. Since LinkedIn released its pronoun disclosure feature on March 30, over 6 million users have already started adding pronouns to their profiles, according to Suzi Owens, the director of corporate communications for consumer products at LinkedIn. In interviews LinkedIn conducted with jobseekers, 70% felt it was important that recruiters and hiring managers knew their pronouns, and 72% of hiring managers agreed, believing that having pronouns visible shows respect.

Zoom’s feature, which launched in June, allows users to decide between always sharing their pronouns in every meeting or sharing them on a meeting-by-meeting basis, taking into account that some people might not want to share their pronouns in every circumstance. Williams also acknowledged that in different areas of the world, people might have different safety levels around pronoun disclosure.

If you refer to someone by the wrong pronouns, correct yourself and apologize, but don’t make your feelings the focus, Williams said. “No one is going to get it right 100% of the time, especially if gender pronoun usage is new,” she added.

At the end of the day, integrating pronoun disclosures into day-to-day business practices can “feel weird,” Blanche acknowledged. It may be uncomfortable at first, but “it’s OK to have discomfort. That’s a sign that you’re growing.”


Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Wednesday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.
Latest Stories