Gaming companies never unionize. Call of Duty developers decided to anyway.

Just days after Microsoft announced its plans to acquire Activision Blizzard, the quality assurance devs for Call of Duty became only the second group of U.S.-based video game workers to ever formally organize.

Raven Software Corporation logo of a video game developer

Raven quality assurance employees went on a five-week strike and formed a union following Raven's termination of 12 employees.

Photo Illustration: Pavlo Gonchar/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

The same day Call of Duty quality assurance testers ended a five-week walkout, their managers called them to a meeting. The company, Activision Blizzard’s Raven Software, would be splitting up the remaining 30-plus workers and placing them in different departments, where they could work more closely with other teams responsible for the hugely popular and lucrative Call of Duty: Warzone.

The change came just three days after those same workers announced they had formed a union, called the Game Workers Alliance, with the Communications Workers of America, only the second group of U.S.-based game developers to try to unionize. Activision Blizzard has decided not to voluntarily recognize the GWA following weeks of silence regarding the walkout, which was instigated by Raven terminating the contracts of 12 QA employees. In response, the GWA has filed a petition with the National Labor Relations Board to hold a formal vote for legal recognition, sparking an unprecedented labor campaign in the game industry.

Onah Rongstad, one of the Raven QA testers in the GWA, had been advocating for the restructuring for almost a year, working closely with Raven management on the project. She’s long been in favor of the idea that the restructure, a process the industry refers to as “embedding,” could create room for more career advancement and more specialized work for QA testers. But Raven announced the plan by inviting workers and managers to a meeting just one hour before it took place on the same day they ended their strike — shocking everyone in attendance.

“It was a very confusing Monday,” Rongstad told Protocol. While she still supports the restructure, it felt as if the company was using the idea she had advocated for as a way to undermine the newly formed union, though Activision Blizzard has reiterated in public statements that the move was part of a months-long planned process. “The planning of it and the timing however, makes me a little suspicious,” Rongstad said. “It unfortunately seems to me that the embedding of testers — that plan — was more of a union-busting effort than a genuine effort.”

“We carefully reviewed and considered the CWA initial request last week and tried to find a mutually acceptable solution with the CWA that would have led to an expedited election process. Unfortunately, the parties could not reach an agreement,” an Activision Blizzard spokesperson wrote in an email to Protocol. In separate statements, the company has defended the timing of its embedding plan for the QA department and hinted at its intentions to try and force a company-wide vote for unionization, not just one among QA workers. Raven currently employs more than 300 people.

“The most important thing to the company is that each eligible employee has the opportunity to have their voice heard and their individual vote counted, and we think all employees at Raven should have a say in this decision,” an Activision Blizzard spokesperson said.

The fight for unionization at Raven Software represents a much larger movement within the industry that’s been brewing for the last few years, in tandem with activist movements within Big Tech and amid a nationwide reckoning over workers' rights. The North American video game industry, which comprises roughly a third of the global games market by revenue, is not unionized, save for a single indie studio that formed the region’s first union late last year. This stands in stark contrast to other creative industries like Hollywood, in which large swaths of the production is done by union workers.

In gaming, workers have been left unprotected when, for instance, a game flops, a contract falls through or a project is put on ice or rebooted. Often, employees of game studios bear the financial brunt of mismanagement or the whims of publishers or parent companies, forced to move projects or relocate to other states to take on new employment because of factors outside their control.

These market conditions and workplace norms have created a culture of exploitation in the game industry where unstable contract work, long and brutal hours — known as crunch — and layoffs are routine and expected. And because few game developers have a say over the conditions in which they work, the industry has become a breeding ground for sexual harassment and discrimination. This includes Activision Blizzard and its subsidiaries, according to an explosive and ongoing California lawsuit filed against the publisher last summer that instigated the company’s current labor rights movement.

Raven, which is located in Madison, Wisconsin, had been largely absent from this movement, which took on the name ABK Workers Alliance in the immediate aftermath of the lawsuit. Through the ABK group, workers at subsidiaries like Blizzard Entertainment have organized employee protests, amassed thousands of employee signatures calling for CEO Bobby Kotick to resign and, ultimately, influenced Activision Blizzard’s decision to sell the company to Microsoft earlier this month in a landmark $68.7 billion deal.

But the situation at Raven changed on Dec. 3, when management informed the QA department it would be converting them to full-time employees. Normally, that would be a cause for celebration, considering QA work is overwhelmingly performed on contract. But at the same time, the company said it would not be renewing the contracts of 12 workers, or roughly a third of the department.

“I was one of the first people in there because I have the privilege of having an ‘A’ in my last name,” said Becka Aigner, a former animator who joined Raven as a QA tester in August of 2020. “I was one of the first people to be converted to [full-time] and thought the good news was going to be spread throughout the department.” Aigner said she joined Raven because a friend told her of its sterling reputation for treating QA fairly, paying higher-than-average wages and offering rare career advancement into other roles in the game industry.

After realizing Raven would be cutting 12 members of the team, the QA department convened to decide that the following Monday they would not come into work. “We got together and a lot of it was processing the initial shock of it all. A lot of us are extremely close. We work day to day and often communicate between teams,” Aigner said. “We wanted to give Activision and Raven the opportunity to reflect like we did and see that, you know, we are an essential process,” she added. “We didn’t want to make decisions for them. We wanted them to come to us and communicate and have transparency, like they had always promised us.”

Instead, the company never said a word, despite repeated attempts to communicate with management. “We never got a response at all from Raven management or leadership until we formed the union. That’s the only time we ever got an official email,” Aigner said, noting that the email came not from their managers or the head of the studio, but from Activision Blizzard proper and addressed to the entire staff.

“We gave them the opportunity to have a seat at the negotiation table and maybe open up a dialogue. When we were not given any sort of response or wiggle room, that’s when we decided our best course forward would be a means of solidarity,” Aigner said.

By that point, the ABK Workers Alliance had already partnered with the CWA for legal advice and organizing guidance over the months that followed that California lawsuit. So when Raven abruptly announced it would not be renewing 12 QA tester contracts in December, the remaining workers had CWA to help them protest what they described as layoffs. (Activision Blizzard explained the contract terminations last month by saying it was converting more than 500 employees to full time, while terminating 20 people’s contracts.)

With CWA’s support, the QA testers walked off the job for five weeks and spent that time planning their union, using a GoFundMe set up by the ABK group to help cover living costs. Shortly after the walkout began, Activision Blizzard announced it would stop paying the QA employees after the first three days, and Chief Administrative Officer Brian Bulatao sent a company-wide email to employees asking them to “consider the consequences” of formally signing with CWA.

Deciding to form a union wasn’t contentious for most of the QA testers because they are more than co-workers: They’re each other’s social group outside of work, too, Rongstad said. “We are genuinely close friends. We all hang out outside of work, we spend time together playing board games.”

“Unions have been around for a long time. But software labor and the games industry, the workers in this industry, are still relatively new. It’s exciting for us to kind of tip the domino in that direction for positive change,” Aigner said. “I want to reiterate that this is a growing momentum. Both people in the industry and outside the industry, who work in games and are fans of games, want to see change.”

Since going public Jan. 21, QA testers with the GWA have had conversations about unionization with other Raven departments — but CWA strategists and the Raven testers didn’t think that trying to unionize all of Raven at once would be the best or most successful move.

“It’s our opinion that unions want to represent people who are enthusiastic about being represented. Raven QA has a supermajority of people who are enthusiastic supporters of the union. Once that union is in place, once we can show our colleagues how a union functions in a factual way,” Rongstad said, “we want to be able to facilitate the growth of unions throughout ABK.”


Slack’s rallying cry at Dreamforce: No more meetings

It’s not all cartoon bears and therapy pigs — work conferences are a good place to talk about the future of work.

“We want people to be able to work in whatever way works for them with flexible schedules, in meetings and out of meetings,” Slack chief product officer Tamar Yehoshua told Protocol at Dreamforce 2022.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dreamforce is primarily Salesforce’s show. But Slack wasn’t to be left out, especially as the primary connector between Salesforce and the mainstream working world.

The average knowledge worker spends more time using a communication tool like Slack than a CRM like Salesforce, positioning it as the best Salesforce product to concern itself with the future of work. In between meeting a therapy pig and meditating by the Dreamforce waterfall, Protocol sat down with several Slack execs and conference-goers to chat about the shifting future.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.


These two AWS vets think they can finally solve enterprise blockchain

Vendia, founded by Tim Wagner and Shruthi Rao, wants to help companies build real-time, decentralized data applications. Its product allows enterprises to more easily share code and data across clouds, regions, companies, accounts, and technology stacks.

“We have this thesis here: Cloud was always the missing ingredient in blockchain, and Vendia added it in,” Wagner (right) told Protocol of his and Shruthi Rao's company.

Photo: Vendia

The promise of an enterprise blockchain was not lost on CIOs — the idea that a database or an API could keep corporate data consistent with their business partners, be it their upstream supply chains, downstream logistics, or financial partners.

But while it was one of the most anticipated and hyped technologies in recent memory, blockchain also has been one of the most failed technologies in terms of enterprise pilots and implementations, according to Vendia CEO Tim Wagner.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Latest Stories