Secret Santa apps are a thing. And the people who make them are as jolly as you'd expect.

Stalwarts like Elfster and DrawNames have been around for 20 years. Can a new app break into the Secret Santa market?

Two figures are handing each other gifts.

The Secret Santa app options are plentiful, somewhat surprising for such an uncomplicated concept.

Illustration: Anna Leskinen/Getty Images Plus; Protocol

Click banner image for more holiday coverage for 2021

Some say the Secret Santa gift exchange comes from “Julklapp,” an 18th-century Scandinavian tradition where people anonymously threw gifts into others’ houses. For better or worse, we don’t catapult gifts into living rooms anymore. Instead, we use an app that randomly matches friends/co-workers/classmates/family members/etc. for us so we don’t have to spend a year’s paycheck on buying gifts for every single person in our lives. We call those Secret Santa apps (or Secret Snowflake apps, depending on where you grew up.)

The Secret Santa app options are plentiful, somewhat surprising for such an uncomplicated concept. Or perhaps unsurprising, because people often think up the same, simple solutions all the time. All you need is one chaotic, disastrous IRL Secret Santa exchange to think, “Hey, there should be an app for this!” Elfster CEO Peter Imburg isn’t sure if he was the first, but he’s certainly been one of the most successful.

Elfster is a dominant Secret Santa website and app, with 17 million users and frequent appearances on “best of” lists. Its story began in 2000, when Imburg’s wife and sister expressed frustrations with organizing a cross-country family Secret Santa. Imburg had a “this should be tech” lightbulb, and four years later, Elfster was open to the public.

“There was a shareware downloadable thing that was pretty hokey,” Imburg said, describing the pre-Elfster Secret Santa tech that existed. “That’s not what I was thinking. It had to feel a bit like the social network, where your feed is about what you're wishing for and you connect in groups with your friends.”

The Elfster of 2004 looked a bit different than it does today. A friend’s elf illustration is mostly gone from the website (“We got a lot of, ‘Love your site. What’s up with the creepy elf?” Imburg said). It retired a slogan that’s very, well, 2004 and perhaps wasn’t beloved by its mostly female user base. The most important thing Elfster has learned is to keep the app simple, which is harder than it sounds. The app used to have a “do not wish list” and non-anonymous gift exchange. Both ended up being more harmful than helpful. “There’s always ideas of what you can add,” Imburg said. “Addition through subtraction is what we say. What can we take away and make it better?”

Simplicity also drives DrawNames, another popular Secret Santa website. Founded 21 years ago by Arjan Kuiper in the Netherlands, it began as a free website pairing people in gift exchanges during Christmastime. It went offline each January. About 10 years ago, Kuiper bought and expanded to the U.S. and U.K. In late 2021 it launched a mobile app.

Like Elfster, it makes money by partnering with retailers and listing their products on its site. That’s how it avoids spamming users with ads and selling data — though there are plenty of people who would love to get their hands on users’ personal wishlists. Imburg said Elfster collects data in aggregate to highlight trending products. This year, they used this data to host a “Wish of the Week” and gave out a gift to one of their users.

Once people find a Secret Santa service that works, they’ll stick to it. “Once they use DrawNames, we rarely find people switch to another website,” said North American marketing manager Martin Looij. “It’s just clean, simple. People get what they want.

Looij said Elfster and DrawNames hold the majority of the market in terms of Secret Santa websites, but it’s slightly more spread out when it comes to mobile apps. Elfster, DrawNames, Santa’s Secret Keeper and Secret Santa 22 are some of the top apps. Imburg sent his encouragement to everyone trying to enter the Secret Santa app game (which is easy to do when you’re at the top). “We have a first-mover advantage and a network effect, things like that playing in our favor,” Imburg said. “But to be honest I have such a warm feeling towards anyone who’s doing something like what we’re doing.”

There are seemingly new Secret Santa apps each year. Jolly, the brainchild of textile factory owner Robert Rinearson and friend David Gorski, launched in October, after which it promptly dealt with feedback about a “lackluster” UI. Rinearson and Gorski hired a UI designer for a more finished look.

Like any new app, Jolly thinks it’s doing things a bit differently from other apps. You can purchase products within the app that come from dropshipping services, and “Jolly party” hosts can earn a small fee. Hosts can either charge an “entrance” fee, out of which Apple or Google takes 30% and Jolly takes 20%, or a “gift” fee, which comes when a participant buys a product within Jolly. Rinearson has high hopes: Secret Santa organizers channeling fees to a charitable cause, and influencers attracting fans to the app with their own Secret Santa parties.

“It’s a different way of looking at it because right now Secret Santa is this close-knit group,” Rinearson said. “What we think it can really be used for is the modern age where you have bigger communities where everyone goes by usernames.”

It’s too soon to tell if that’s something people really want, though. The persistence of Elfster and DrawNames indicate that people like to keep their Secret Santas simple. “As long as Elfster has been out there, I’ve seen new things come and go every year,” Imburg said.

But maybe some of you want to ditch simplicity, and spice up your Secret Santa this year (if it’s not too late). Looij said white elephant, where people swap cheap and funny gifts, has become increasingly popular. Rinearson suggested pairing up with a stranger to exchange gifts, which his app offers through a “Jolly Duo” feature. Imburg recommended pairing a group activity, like ordering delicious foods or applying a facial, with a Zoom gift exchange. As omicron spreads rapidly, a remote Secret Santa is definitely your best option.

Correction: The article was updated on December 18 to reflect that Martin Looij told Protocol that Elfster and DrawNames hold the majority of the market in terms of Secret Santa websites.


A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories