Dips in subscribers and a fight for your attention: How ed tech looks a lot like Netflix

A lot of the challenges facing Netflix were first seen in the corporate learning landscape years ago.


Learning and development platforms want stay nimble and relevant.


For those keeping score, yet another ed tech company in the corporate learning space has consolidated. Early last month, Codecademy, the learning platform known for teaching millions how to code online, finalized its agreement to be acquired by Skillsoft.

Consolidation has become commonplace in the sector. This is the third ed tech acquisition since June 2021, when Skillsoft went public. The company is known in the industry as one of the earliest purveyors in the corporate education game.

This most recent acquisition represents efforts by some of the oldest and most established learning and development platforms to stay nimble and relevant in a time when attention is scarce and training material goes quickly out of date. And while some may be concerned that this foreshadows a future in which the space is controlled by a few mighty corporate learning providers, experts say the opposite is true.

For Skillsoft, the move to acquire Codecademy made sense. The company has been rapidly building out a full suite of new learning options for its corporate partners to hit employees at every level. Skillsoft acquired both Global Knowledge, a technical training platform, and Pluma, a leadership coaching platform, in 2021. Skillsoft CEO Jeff Tarr said the company is also optimizing content for mobile to catch people wherever they are online.

“We've created what we refer to as the new Skillsoft,” said Tarr, who officially assumed the role last year. He described the company's variety of ed tech offerings for learning leaders, including those from Skillsoft, Global Knowledge, Pluma and now Codecademy. “Each bring something different and special to the table,” Tarr told Protocol.

While Skillsoft has long been known as a major player in online learning aimed at enterprise companies and their employees, Global Knowledge is more of a leader in instructor-led, synchronous learning. Its trainings focus primarily on the technical skills needed to support some of the largest hardware and software vendors in the world, he said. Pluma, on the other hand, delivers executive, leadership and management coaching to corporate employees.

“We've put all of these together with the objective of creating a new and more absorbing and engaging way to learn online,” said Tarr. He’s thinking about how to capture audiences with content that appeals to a wide variety of interests while also justifying the cost.

“When it comes to everything we do, we believe we don't just compete with other learning options: We're competing for learners' time with other options in general. So we have to compete with the most compelling entertainment options that people have, because when you're going to be on a mobile device and you have a choice of how you're going to use your time, we want people to learn,” he said. “And so that means consumerizing the experience … And it means making what we do incredibly engaging.”

Josh Bersin, industry analyst and CEO of The Josh Bersin Company, likens what’s been happening in the enterprise ed tech industry over the past several years to what we are now seeing at Netflix: dips in subscribers and a fight for consumers’ attention.

“It's very similar to the problem at Netflix: You get really big and you have all these customers, and all of a sudden, you don't have the best content anymore, and a bunch of people leave,” said Bersin. That’s why so many enterprise ed tech companies have taken to buying up smaller brands with more innovative content and established customer bases.

Zach Sims, co-founder and CEO of Codecademy, said the company will continue to hold on to its distinct value proposition: offering highly interactive technical training for anyone to learn, even as it moves under the historically corporate umbrella of Skillsoft. He touts its “learning by doing” model and the quality of content as what make Codecademy so unique.

“There are bootcamp programs, there are more intensive programs that are created in partnership with universities or someone else, but we stand behind our content because we create almost all of it in-house,” Sims told Protocol.

Because of their size, companies like Codecademy are often considered to be the most innovative and nimble in the space. “The dynamics are: When you're small and creative, you come up with really good content, and really creative new ways of expressing it. The bigger you get, the more your company becomes a sales and marketing company,” said Bersin.

But this does not mean the industry is doomed to consolidate into several big enterprise ed tech companies in the future. “What actually happens is the opposite. A lot of the really big ones go out of business … because their content was old,” he said.

Bersin believes there will always be a bevy of smaller mom-and-pop ed tech shops in the corporate learning landscape.


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (


White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories