Stripe is on a hiring spree. But it's also rescinding job offers and angering engineers.

The revoked offers are supposedly a result of "shifting business priorities" and staff reorganization.

Stripe building.

Several Stripe job applicants told Protocol that they had been offered jobs either verbally or in writing and then had them rescinded with little explanation.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The prevailing narrative about tech workers assumes that they have more power than ever before. This even has a term — the Great Resignation.

But at the booming, much-revered payments company Stripe, some applicants have found themselves accepting job offers only to learn they have been rescinded without warning.

Protocol spoke with two Stripe candidates who received either verbal or written offers from the company and then had those offers revoked because of “shifting business priorities.” (We reviewed their communications with Stripe recruiters, including the offer letter, to confirm the candidates’ stories). Protocol also spoke with a former Stripe recruiter who described the company as embracing a “hire and fire” mentality and constantly shifting priorities and reorganizing staff. All three of these sources were granted anonymity for fear of repercussions by their current and potential future employers. Protocol also reviewed multiple online complaints detailing similar rescinded offers; the most prominent of these complaints was posted on Hacker News and received a rousing defense of Stripe from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong.

“We want everyone who interacts with Stripe during a recruiting process to be treated professionally and with respect. We value feedback and are always looking for ways to improve our recruiting experience,” a Stripe spokesperson wrote to Protocol.

Stripe, which has the highest valuation of any private, venture-backed tech company in the U.S., has grown so rapidly over the last few years that many engineers and other tech workers see it as one of the most desirable, successful places to work. The former recruiter interviewed by Protocol said that she chose the job over offers at Google and two other tech companies, in part because of the extremely positive and enthusiastic way the company was sold to her and because of Stripe’s reputation in the industry.

Stripe is also not the only tech company to face problems with recruitment and hiring processes in the last year. The coronavirus pandemic has wreaked havoc on how people interview for jobs, made workers more empowered during the application process and helped many VC-backed tech companies grow so wealthy that they are all competing bitterly for the same pool of talent. Facebook spent the first quarter of 2021 battling one of its worst hiring crises in years, as engineers turned down job offers at unusually high rates and negative Glassdoor reviews spiked. Google’s interview process has a long-held reputation as unnecessarily difficult and complex.

The Stripe applicants interviewed by Protocol and those who have shared their stories online have said that the experience of interviewing with Stripe was generally positive, and that they had no problem with the recruiters themselves. Those who faced rescinded offers also said that losing the offer itself was less frustrating than the company’s refusal to give a personal explanation.

One technical manager — now employed elsewhere — described being approached by a Stripe recruiter when she took some time off of working. She agreed to go through the interview process and found herself meeting with “tons” of people, preparing an elaborate presentation and going through several role-playing exercises. “It was very complex and very hard,” she said.

And the feedback Stripe gave her was entirely positive. In the first half of 2021, she received a verbal offer, then a written one. She signed the offer. And then she tweeted that she would be joining the company.

“A few days after that, I got a call from an executive recruiter who I had never heard from before, and she said, 'There is no easy way to say this. We have to rescind our offer due to changing company priorities.' She said she was sorry,” she said. “After that, I emailed the recruiter and the hiring manager, and I didn’t hear back from either of them ever.”

Another engineer recently described a similar process. Though he did not receive a written offer, he was offered a job verbally by the recruiter who led him through the process. After communicating his intent to accept the job, the recruiter later told him that he would not be given an offer letter because of a “business decision” and “change of direction,” and declined to provide more information or answer further questions.

On Tuesday, Armstrong defended Stripe in a post on Hacker News in response to an anonymous person who alleged a similar experience. “Any time you have thousand of interviews going on, you are bound to get some bad candidate experiences, I know for instance these happen in Coinbase periodically, and we try to minimize it for sure, but you will not get it to zero (especially when growing quickly),” he wrote. He also said that often, lukewarm or bad reference checks can cause delays in the process, and recruiters may not be willing to explain this to candidates in order to protect the people who gave references.

According to the former Stripe recruiter (who has years of experience at other top tech companies and has remained employed as a recruiter elsewhere), Stripe recruiting teams and the company in general often lacked the formal processes that lead to a smooth recruiting and hiring process. “It was an organization that seemed to shift priorities a lot. I feel like every two weeks there was a reorg. When you have that going on, to recruit for that, makes it difficult,” she said. “I just don’t think they have any idea of process — when I was trying to hire, … some of our interviewers met with something like 17 people over two days.”

This recruiter Protocol spoke to was let go from the company after about four months on the job without explanation, within weeks of another recruiter who also spent a correspondingly short time at Stripe. “I know a lot of people have felt that the organization has moved much more to the hire and fire mentality. I felt like that happened to my role. I know other people felt like they were brought in and then left out as sheep for slaughter,” she said.

The technical manager who signed the offer before it was rescinded feels more frustrated about the lack of recourse than the actual loss of the job. “It’s OK to break agreements when things happen. I don’t want to go to a company if there’s no place for me, but if companies are requiring transparency and honesty from me, they should do the same,” she said. “I got a lot of DMs from people who had hiring issues with Stripe after. You lift the veneer a bit, and they have just as many problems as anybody.”


A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories