How codes of conduct can be weaponized against workers

Codes of conduct usually protect companies from legal liability, not enshrine cultural values or worker protections.

A businessperson at a desk looking stressed.

Codes of conduct typically outline illegal behaviors at work, according to employment lawyers.

Photo: martin-dm via Getty

Despite loving her company and her coworkers, Britt Caldwell was miserable at work. Her relationship with her manager had deteriorated to the point that she felt cut out of meetings, forced to perform acts of "loyalty," gossiped about, disrespected professionally and stripped of authority. Informal conversations with human resources left her believing that she could either tolerate the situation or quit, she told Protocol.

So Caldwell wrote a viral blog post about the toxic power given to white women in the workplace, filed her six weeks notice at Webflow, and started the process of a formal HR investigation into the situation with her manager. Nearly two months later, just a few days before her last day at Webflow in mid-June, the investigation (conducted by a third-party attorney) concluded that "there was no unlawful behavior or Webflow policy violation substantiated."

Caldwell was devastated. "I had at least six hours with the investigators. Two different sessions. I gave them a million screenshots," she said. She felt angry — at the company to a certain extent, but more at the reality that Webflow's policies weren't designed to prevent the experience she'd had. The conclusion left her wondering: "What's even the point of a code of conduct?"

Ellen Pao, the CEO of Project Include (a nonprofit advocating for diversity and inclusion in tech) and the former CEO of Reddit, sees Caldwell's experience as an example of a broader institutional problem with codes of conduct and workplace investigations that she has observed in her research. "It's because the whole system is broken. The company hires an investigator, it's usually a lawyer who investigates companies," she said. "There's a lot of conflict in this situation. A lot of lawyers build reputations of protecting companies as investigators, and that's how they get repeat business. And that's why these reports come out and a lot of them are garbage."

Webflow has a reputation for being a company that values its workers and seeks to build an inclusive environment; its CEO, Vlad Magdalin, is almost the Twitter cult leader for inclusive culture. "We highly value our team and fully encourage employees to always surface any questions or concerns they may have about behavior in the workplace and continue to do everything we can to ensure Webflow is an open, honest, equitable and enjoyable place to work. We believe our code of conduct reinforces this," the company wrote in response to questions about the purpose of its code of conduct.

Caldwell said that she still believes that the company's management means what it's said (and continues to say) about inclusive culture, but now she wonders if the lawyers and HR teams that design code-of-conduct policies structure them so it is impossible to turn those words into reality.

"These policies are where tech companies, and any corporation or business entity, can get the get-out-of-jail-free card. They can be these people — and I believe the people at Webflow really are — but at the end of the day when you're the judge, the jury, the executioner, and you've got a lot to lose, it doesn't matter," Caldwell said.

"Another outcome for me could have been that Webflow said, 'Oh, this didn't violate our code of conduct? Maybe we should change it.' If anyone is going to hold themselves accountable, it's Vlad. They're the one company that I truly believe does care," she said.

In general, codes of conduct are designed to protect companies from liability for workplace conduct that breaks the law. By outlining the policies in a handbook and published code of conduct, it becomes more straightforward for companies to fire people who explicitly break any of those rules — and prevents the company from being vulnerable to charges that it isn't clear about what it does and does not not allow at work. "That is almost always the driver of anti-sexual harassment policies, anti-bullying policies, all of those things. It's not trying to define how a culture can be great, it's about how a company can be protected from liability," said Lisa Gelobter, the CEO of tEQuitable, an organization that provides third-party ombuds services for companies and workers. "It doesn't have to be that way, but it is typically that way."

These types of policies are usually designed to reflect the minimum standard of acceptable behavior, according to Domenique Camacho Moran, a New York-based attorney who helps companies write these policies and other handbook documents. Both Camacho Moran and Gelobter often use the word "aspirational" to describe a company's cultural ideals; for Camacho Moran, the "aspirational" goals usually end up in a statement about what is hoped for at the beginning of a handbook, not in a document outlining required behaviors inside the code of conduct.

"In some places, they use the code of conduct as a cudgel for the letter of the law, as opposed to actually looking for the intent. A code of conduct, typically, is intended to protect companies. That is their raison d'etre. Should it be that way? No, in my opinion," Gelobter said. Codes of conduct are typically written with the assistance of a lawyer or company general counsel, and they rarely involve extensive worker input.

Camacho Moran believes that most institutional problems aren't created by the code of conduct itself, and that the code of conduct should not be used to navigate every workplace cultural complaint. She often advises companies that words like "bullying" and "mean" and "friendly" are too loaded with subjective perspectives and experience to be valuable in a code of conduct. "Sometimes when it is perceived to be mean behavior, ... it's just holding people to a standard. And sometimes it's holding people to a standard and it's laced with mean behavior. When we talk about bullying, it's so subjective," she said.

Gelobter, whose role as an ombudsperson means that she is ideally focused on protecting companies and workers equally, believes that codes of conduct in their current form neither protect companies from risk nor protect workers. Writing codes of conduct that just stick to the legal rules about what is and is not allowed at work doesn't seem to be reducing the risk of a massive workplace scandal or lawsuit like the one currently snowballing at Activision Blizzard, or the countless others at Tesla, Google, Pinterest and more. "The way [companies] have been doing it with codes of conduct, with policies, are actually a greater risk than looking at it differently," she explained.

Gelobter worries that companies usually want to blame specific people, rather than the company and culture structure, for workplace problems. "It's not about one human, it's about what in the culture are the processes of the organization that have enabled that or have allowed that to happen. The companies are like, 'let's root out that one human,'" she said. While removing a harasser is obviously important, it doesn't usually solve the company culture issues that allowed that harassment to happen in the first place. And for many workers, toxic environments are created by countless smaller injustices and comments that add up to an unsafe or unhealthy place to work, even if one specific individual isn't to blame for all of the causes.

What does "doing it differently" look like in practice? Pao, who did work to create culture change while CEO at Reddit, believes it's about bringing workers and institutional leaders together to create a codified system of values. If workers are involved in creating the code of conduct, then people are less likely to understand it as a random set of rules that cause harm. "There is no template to use," she said. "It should cover the values of a company. This is a core of value sets that we are trying to enforce and promote, and these are the things we need to do to make sure that happens."

Workers who witness harassment, disrespect or other toxic behavior also need to be able to trust their HR departments with complaints, or at least trust the third-party investigator hired by their employer. Research from Pao at Project Include and surveys at tEQuitable have both found that at the moment, most employees don't have that trust.

"The companies that we work with are all folks who are invested in making their organizations better. They are like, 'We want to fix this. Oh wait, our people don't trust HR. We should bring in tEQuitable.' They are trying to make change," Golebtor said.

Pao worries that even hiring companies like tEQuitable doesn't alleviate the fundamental problem: When a company pays for its own investigators, it's difficult to feel there is true independence or trustworthiness.

"At the end of the day, somebody has to pay for it. Maybe there can be an industry-wide process that covers it. I think that people who are driving some of these companies — tEquitable and others — are great. I just worry about the business model. You have to be a really strong leader in an outside organization to report really terrible problems," Pao said.

Caldwell wrote her first blog post about her experience with her manager because she needed a way to process how she came to realize her experience of work was toxic and unhealthy. She is now sharing the conclusion of her story at Webflow because months of reflection have led her to understand how companies are designed to protect themselves, regardless of what the people who lead them may say and truly believe about their duty to workers. She believes that Webflow's code of conduct should have been better designed to prevent the experience she had at work, and she wishes the company had decided to revisit its code of conduct in light of the news that her own experiences didn't violate any company policies.

"My generation and future generations, we are demanding dignity and respect. That's what we're demanding, just dignity and respect. It's wild how hard that is for us," she said.


The Senate antitrust bill just created some very weird alliances

Democrats and Republicans have found the tech reform debate scrambles traditional party politics — and Tim Cook and Ted Cruz have found themselves chatting.

The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced a bill on Thursday that could remake the tech industry.

Photo: PartTime Portraits/Unsplash

Strange alliances formed ahead of Thursday's vote to advance a key antitrust bill to the Senate floor, with frequent foes like Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Ted Cruz supporting the measure, and prominent Democrats including California Sen. Dianne Feinstein pushing back against it.

Ultimately the bill moved out of the Senate Judiciary Committee by a vote of 16-6 after a surprisingly speedy debate (at least, speedy for the Senate). Even some of the lawmakers who called for further changes agreed to move the bill forward — a sign that the itch to finally regulate Big Tech after years of congressional inaction is intensifying, even as the issue scrambles traditional party politics in a way that could threaten its final passage.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.

Should your salary depend on meeting DEI goals?

Diversio just raised $6.5 million to use AI to fix DEI.

Laura McGee has spent her entire career thinking about diversity and business. At one point, she helped lead the Trump-Trudeau Council for Advancement of Women, working with the prime minister and president to build a plan to grow the North American economy through diversity. During that time, she kept hearing from CEOs that they cared about diversity and wanted to improve, but that they had “no data and no metrics.”

That was when she decided to build Diversio: a platform that makes data collection, as well as acting on it, “super simple.”

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Why low-code and no-code AI tools pose new risks

The low-code trend has come to AI, but skeptics worry that gifting amateurs with Easy-Bake Ovens for machine-learning models is a recipe for disaster.

The same things that make low- and no-code AI so appealing can pose problems.

Image: Boris SV/Moment/Getty Images

“No code. No joke.”

This is the promise made by enterprise AI company C3 AI in splashy web ads for its Ex Machina software. Its competitor Dataiku says its own low-code and no-code software “elevates” business experts to use AI. DataRobot calls customers using its no-code software to make AI-based apps “AI heroes.”

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.


How 'Dan from HR' became TikTok’s favorite career coach

You can get a lot of advice about corporate America on TikTok. ‘Dan from HR’ wants to make sure you’re getting the right instruction.

'Dan from HR' has posted hundreds of videos on his TikTok account about everything from cover letters to compensation.

Image: Dan Space

Daniel Space downloaded TikTok for the same reason most of us did. He was bored.

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Space wanted to connect with his younger cousin, who uses TikTok, so he thought he’d get on the platform and try it out (although he refused to do any of the dances). Eventually, the algorithm figured out that Space is a longtime HR professional and fed him a post with resume tips — the only issue was that the advice was “really horrible,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Sarah Roach

Sarah Roach is a reporter and producer at Protocol (@sarahroach_) where she contributes to Source Code, Protocol's daily newsletter. She is a recent graduate of George Washington University, where she studied journalism and mass communication and criminal justice. She previously worked for two years as editor in chief of her school's independent newspaper, The GW Hatchet.

Latest Stories