Being a tech whistleblower is dangerous and expensive. Now there’s a guide to the risks.

Worker advocate Ifeoma Ozoma launched her guide today to helping tech workers calculate the risks of going public with stories that hold tech companies to account.

An illustration of a whistle.

Ifeoma Ozoma's tech whistleblower handbook is intended to help workers understand the risks of going public with their story and make it easier to handle if they decide to go through with it.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

This week, Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen revealed herself to the world through a detailed and carefully executed rollout planned by a whistleblower agency. Now, there's quite literally a website to help other tech workers — whether they work in retail, the C-suite or somewhere in between — decide for themselves whether they want to do the same.

On Wednesday morning, Pinterest whistleblower Ifeoma Ozoma, alongside whistleblower support agencies including Lioness, the Signals Network, Elite Strategy Global and the Whistleblowing International Network, launched a website intended to serve as a guide to helping workers across the tech industry decide if they want to speak publicly about an issue or story, and, if they do, plan strategies like Haugen's. The site details the cost-benefit calculations a worker has to make when thinking about reporting or leaking information, the places to seek legal, emotional and media support, ways to protect from retaliation and other information someone might need to calculate the potentially life-altering risk of speaking publicly about a company or its actions. While the work was supported and funded by the Omidyar Network (a "philanthropic" investment firm), Ozoma was quick to stress that the site is hosted and managed independently by her (for tech workers who might be skeptical about the guide's true intentions).

The handbook is the brainchild of Ozoma, who became a household name in the tech world after she and Aerica Shimizu Banks, then employees of Pinterest, spoke publicly about their experiences of racial and gender-based discrimination and harassment at the company. Since departing Pinterest, Ozoma has become an activist fighting for workers' ability to speak freely about their experiences at tech companies. In California, she helped craft a bill that would prohibit companies from forcing workers to sign non-disclosure agreements that could prevent them from speaking up about harassment or discrimination. Known as the Silenced No More Act, the bill has passed both California chambers and now awaits Gov. Gavin Newsom's signature, though he has not said whether he plans to sign it.

"This is not a 'how to.' You cannot tell anyone how to potentially ruin their lives. That is not something that is responsible. That is not something I would ever do," Ozoma said about the new handbook. "It's not the sort of thing that you would ever tell someone how to do. Preparedness is power. It doesn't mean that shit won't be terrible."

Ozoma, Banks and countless other whistleblowers who came before Haugen have always had to make a careful calculation about the risk posed to their jobs, reputations and financial futures. Not only do whistleblowers risk being blacklisted by their former employer and the tech industry as a whole, they could also face lawsuits (if they break an NDA, for example) or reputational career issues that extend far beyond the sector they work in. The playbook behind Haugen's careful reveal to the world is clearly informed by that reality. And Ozoma has always described herself as relatively privileged by her financial savings and relationships, all of which provided a certain degree of safety for her future that many workers may lack.

The handbook's launch wasn't planned around Haugen's public reveal and congressional testimony. "The timing of this was random," Ozoma said. "I thought, middle of the week tends to be okay for launching things, why don't we do Wednesday?" But the media storm around Haugen — and her clear level of preparedness, ranging from her comfort with the press to her filing complaints with the SEC — has become an accidental living testament to the value of the guide.

The handbook itself has sections written by different organizations in the whistleblowing space, explaining processes, terms and risks, including, but not limited to: how to talk with reporters, how to think about telling a story, legal resources for whistleblowers, the potential for legal repercussions, the security risks of leaking fundamental documents and how to contact government agencies to report issues or seek a federal or state investigation.

Ariella Steinhorn and Amber Scorah, the CEO and president of Lioness respectively, wrote the section of the guide for talking to the media. They see their work as helping people understand how journalists operate, and how to best tell personal stories in a way that resonates with a larger message. "We're helping people understand how to tell their story. It doesn't mean they don't have a valid story," Steinhorn said. "We're explaining what the before, during and after process of bringing a story to the media looks like."

"There is something there too, in the sense that a whistleblower is an isolated individual. This guidebook and the other organizations involved almost become a team that surrounds the whistleblower so that they aren't alone," Scorah said.

Scorah and Stienhorn hope that their section of the guide will act both as a self-serve document and a declaration that anyone who wants support can reach out to Lioness. "We listen to stories sometimes all day long. You end up hearing a lot, and trends emerge, and you start to see a bigger picture of something you know you could get media interest in," Steinhorn said. "Sometimes there is a trend, a larger, clearly emerging picture of a problem that could be something."

To Ozoma, the creation of the handbook is the beginning of an iterative process, not a guide or a how-to stuck in time. "It's not perfect. I don't agree with every single thing that the experts put in it, but you want as much information as possible so you can make the right decision," she said. "I would love it if folks in the tech industry did their own thing, or added thoughts on what they want. This is really something that I want to be built upon. It's not the final say on anything at all. It's really hard to do something like this. We did it so that it's easier the next time."


Gavin Newsom shows crypto some California love

“A more flexible approach is needed,” Gov. Newsom said in rejecting a bill that would require crypto companies to get a state license.

Strong bipartisan support wasn’t enough to convince Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Photo: Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Vox Media

The Digital Financial Assets Law seemed like a legislative slam dunk in California for critics of the crypto industry.

But strong bipartisan support — it passed 71-0 in the state assembly and 31-6 in the Senate — wasn’t enough to convince Gov. Gavin Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Slack’s rallying cry at Dreamforce: No more meetings

It’s not all cartoon bears and therapy pigs — work conferences are a good place to talk about the future of work.

“We want people to be able to work in whatever way works for them with flexible schedules, in meetings and out of meetings,” Slack chief product officer Tamar Yehoshua told Protocol at Dreamforce 2022.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dreamforce is primarily Salesforce’s show. But Slack wasn’t to be left out, especially as the primary connector between Salesforce and the mainstream working world.

The average knowledge worker spends more time using a communication tool like Slack than a CRM like Salesforce, positioning it as the best Salesforce product to concern itself with the future of work. In between meeting a therapy pig and meditating by the Dreamforce waterfall, Protocol sat down with several Slack execs and conference-goers to chat about the shifting future.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories