Workplace

Being a tech whistleblower is dangerous and expensive. Now there’s a guide to the risks.

Worker advocate Ifeoma Ozoma launched her guide today to helping tech workers calculate the risks of going public with stories that hold tech companies to account.

An illustration of a whistle.

Ifeoma Ozoma's tech whistleblower handbook is intended to help workers understand the risks of going public with their story and make it easier to handle if they decide to go through with it.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

This week, Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen revealed herself to the world through a detailed and carefully executed rollout planned by a whistleblower agency. Now, there's quite literally a website to help other tech workers — whether they work in retail, the C-suite or somewhere in between — decide for themselves whether they want to do the same.

On Wednesday morning, Pinterest whistleblower Ifeoma Ozoma, alongside whistleblower support agencies including Lioness, the Signals Network, Elite Strategy Global and the Whistleblowing International Network, launched a website intended to serve as a guide to helping workers across the tech industry decide if they want to speak publicly about an issue or story, and, if they do, plan strategies like Haugen's. The site details the cost-benefit calculations a worker has to make when thinking about reporting or leaking information, the places to seek legal, emotional and media support, ways to protect from retaliation and other information someone might need to calculate the potentially life-altering risk of speaking publicly about a company or its actions. While the work was supported and funded by the Omidyar Network (a "philanthropic" investment firm), Ozoma was quick to stress that the site is hosted and managed independently by her (for tech workers who might be skeptical about the guide's true intentions).

The handbook is the brainchild of Ozoma, who became a household name in the tech world after she and Aerica Shimizu Banks, then employees of Pinterest, spoke publicly about their experiences of racial and gender-based discrimination and harassment at the company. Since departing Pinterest, Ozoma has become an activist fighting for workers' ability to speak freely about their experiences at tech companies. In California, she helped craft a bill that would prohibit companies from forcing workers to sign non-disclosure agreements that could prevent them from speaking up about harassment or discrimination. Known as the Silenced No More Act, the bill has passed both California chambers and now awaits Gov. Gavin Newsom's signature, though he has not said whether he plans to sign it.

"This is not a 'how to.' You cannot tell anyone how to potentially ruin their lives. That is not something that is responsible. That is not something I would ever do," Ozoma said about the new handbook. "It's not the sort of thing that you would ever tell someone how to do. Preparedness is power. It doesn't mean that shit won't be terrible."

Ozoma, Banks and countless other whistleblowers who came before Haugen have always had to make a careful calculation about the risk posed to their jobs, reputations and financial futures. Not only do whistleblowers risk being blacklisted by their former employer and the tech industry as a whole, they could also face lawsuits (if they break an NDA, for example) or reputational career issues that extend far beyond the sector they work in. The playbook behind Haugen's careful reveal to the world is clearly informed by that reality. And Ozoma has always described herself as relatively privileged by her financial savings and relationships, all of which provided a certain degree of safety for her future that many workers may lack.

The handbook's launch wasn't planned around Haugen's public reveal and congressional testimony. "The timing of this was random," Ozoma said. "I thought, middle of the week tends to be okay for launching things, why don't we do Wednesday?" But the media storm around Haugen — and her clear level of preparedness, ranging from her comfort with the press to her filing complaints with the SEC — has become an accidental living testament to the value of the guide.

The handbook itself has sections written by different organizations in the whistleblowing space, explaining processes, terms and risks, including, but not limited to: how to talk with reporters, how to think about telling a story, legal resources for whistleblowers, the potential for legal repercussions, the security risks of leaking fundamental documents and how to contact government agencies to report issues or seek a federal or state investigation.

Ariella Steinhorn and Amber Scorah, the CEO and president of Lioness respectively, wrote the section of the guide for talking to the media. They see their work as helping people understand how journalists operate, and how to best tell personal stories in a way that resonates with a larger message. "We're helping people understand how to tell their story. It doesn't mean they don't have a valid story," Steinhorn said. "We're explaining what the before, during and after process of bringing a story to the media looks like."

"There is something there too, in the sense that a whistleblower is an isolated individual. This guidebook and the other organizations involved almost become a team that surrounds the whistleblower so that they aren't alone," Scorah said.

Scorah and Stienhorn hope that their section of the guide will act both as a self-serve document and a declaration that anyone who wants support can reach out to Lioness. "We listen to stories sometimes all day long. You end up hearing a lot, and trends emerge, and you start to see a bigger picture of something you know you could get media interest in," Steinhorn said. "Sometimes there is a trend, a larger, clearly emerging picture of a problem that could be something."

To Ozoma, the creation of the handbook is the beginning of an iterative process, not a guide or a how-to stuck in time. "It's not perfect. I don't agree with every single thing that the experts put in it, but you want as much information as possible so you can make the right decision," she said. "I would love it if folks in the tech industry did their own thing, or added thoughts on what they want. This is really something that I want to be built upon. It's not the final say on anything at all. It's really hard to do something like this. We did it so that it's easier the next time."

Podcasts

Crypto’s big crash

Is the tech superbubble about to burst?

red and blue light streaks
Photo by Maxim Hopman on Unsplash

This week, we're diving into the crypto crash. What led luna to fall off a cliff? Are we seeing the dot-com bust, part two? Protocol fintech editor Owen Thomas explains it all to us. Then entertainment reporter Janko Roettgers joins us to share the inside scoop on his exclusive interview with Mark Zuckerberg. We learn why Meta is betting it all on the metaverse and Brian finally gets to ask the most pressing question on his mind this week: What does Mark smell like?

And finally, Caitlin and Brian take a moment to reminisce about the iPod, which was put out to pasture this week after more than two decades on the market.

Keep Reading Show less
Caitlin McGarry

Caitlin McGarry is the news editor at Protocol.

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less
Enterprise

Say goodbye to unicorns. The cloud centaurs are here.

Protocol caught up with Bessemer Venture Partners’ Kent Bennett to discuss the state of the cloud, the new SaaS models poised to make a dent on the industry and why the firm developed a new SaaS milestone.

Bessemer Venture Partners developed a new SaaS milestone that it’s calling the “centaur,” for startups that reach over $100 million in annual recurring revenue.

Photo: Bessemer Venture Partners

Kent Bennett thinks the SaaS business model is the “greatest business model in the history of the planet.” As a partner at Bessemer Venture Partners, it’s fitting that he’s bullish on the cloud: Bennett was one of the main authors of Bessemer’s annual State of the Cloud report, which gives a bird's eye view of what’s happening in the cloud economy.

In the report, Bessemer analyzed everything from the new ways SaaS companies are trying to monetize their software to what areas are still underserved by SaaS. The firm also developed a new SaaS milestone that it’s calling the “centaur,” for startups that reach over $100 million in annual recurring revenue.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.

Climate

The future of electrification, according to Google Trends

People are searching more often for how to electrify their lives, from induction stoves to e-bikes.

From “induction stove” to “home EV charging,” search interest is rising.

Photo: Michael Tuszynski via Unsplash

Feeling cynical about the state of the climate? Well, it’s hardly a guarantee of a liveable climate, but a peek at Google Trends might provide a glimmer of hope.

People are increasingly ready for the all-electric future at home and on the road. From “induction stove” to “home EV charging,” search interest is rising. And while climate change is certainly not up to the individual to solve — that’s mainly on governments and corporations — shifts in public tastes can bring about policy changes. Fast. (See: outdoor dining in major cities; marriage equality.)

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

What Elon's Twitter 'hold' even means

The answers to all the Musk-iest Twitter acquisition questions.

Keep in mind that Elon Musk isn't exactly known for telling the truth.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Unsplash; Protocol

Elon Musk can tweet anything he likes, because he’s Elon Musk, and he’s buying Twitter, and free speech is awesome. What he can’t do is make false tweets true.

Musk said Friday that the Twitter deal was temporarily on hold while he looked into a report that spam bots and other fake accounts made up less than 5% of its users. He added, hours after his first tweet, that he was “still committed to [the] acquisition.” Investors promptly sold off shares of Twitter, thinking that Musk’s words somehow had meaning, embodied intent or otherwise had an impact on the world. They did not, eppur si muove, and yet the stock market moved.

Keep Reading Show less
Owen Thomas

Owen Thomas is a senior editor at Protocol overseeing venture capital and financial technology coverage. He was previously business editor at the San Francisco Chronicle and before that editor-in-chief at ReadWrite, a technology news site. You're probably going to remind him that he was managing editor at Valleywag, Gawker Media's Silicon Valley gossip rag. He lives in San Francisco with his husband and Ramona the Love Terrier, whom you should follow on Instagram.

Latest Stories
Bulletins