Workplace

This startup will fire unvaxxed workers. Big Tech won’t say the same.

In an industry built for remote work, will companies fire workers who refuse to get vaccinated?

An illustration of a hand refusing another hand offering a COVID-19 vaccine jar.

Several big tech companies stopped short of saying whether they would fire workers for not getting vaccinated.

Illustration: simplehappyart via Getty Images

As employers wait for the Department of Labor to issue a new rule requiring employee vaccine mandates, a big question looms: Will companies fire workers who don't comply?

Many of the tech giants won't say. A couple of companies have confirmed that they won't: Both Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Pure Storage said vaccination is not a condition of employment, though it's required to come to the office.

Only one software maker — Boston-based Validity — has told Protocol that employees could face termination if they refuse the jab. That even applies to remote workers.

"We're a private employer," said Mike Piispanen, Validity's chief operating officer. "If we wanted employees to wear a clown nose to work every day as a condition of employment, that would be an option."

One employee has left Validity over the company's vaccine mandate, Piispanen said, but the nearly 400-person company hasn't had to fire anyone for this reason.

More than 90% of Validity's employees are currently vaccinated and around a dozen are seeking exemptions for protected medical or religious reasons.

But for those without legally protected exemptions, termination is not out of the question, Piispanen said.

"We don't want that to happen, but we also want our employees to want to be here," Piispanen said. "The downside of accommodating (employees who refuse the vaccine) is they're now putting other people at risk if they're in the office."

Refusing vaccination may make it tougher to get a job in tech. As many as 78% of hiring managers in the computer and IT industry said they wanted to see vaccination status on applicants' resumes in a recent survey.

Will Big Tech fire workers over the vaccine?

Several big tech companies stopped short of saying whether they would fire workers for not getting vaccinated.

Spokespeople for Google, Facebook, Twitter, Uber and Lyft all declined to say whether their employees could face termination for this reason. Google and Lyft only said that employees who don't show proof of vaccination would have to discuss their options with HR.

Neither Uber nor Lyft is currently requiring drivers to get vaccinated.

For office workers, remote work seems like an obvious solution. September Rea, a litigator at the law firm Polsinelli, expects that many companies will continue relegating any unvaccinated employees to remote work.

"I don't see that happening," Rea said. "What I've seen historically — just in the short time we've had vaccination requirements voluntarily — has been they allow people to work from home if they don't want it."

But companies like Validity may want to enforce vaccination regardless. Erin McLaughlin, a shareholder in the labor and employment group at the law firm Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, expects policies to vary by employer.

"I think if it's an employer who wants employees to be back in the office, they're not going to be inclined to grant remote work as an accommodation for not being vaccinated," McLaughlin told Protocol. "They're going to take the position that mandatory attendance in the office is an essential function of the job."

For its part, Uber said it was still figuring out how to handle exemptions and would have a better sense by the time it reopens its offices in January. For now, anyone who goes to an Uber office has to show proof of vaccination, the company said.

That seems to be a common theme for large tech employers, many of which plan to continue allowing remote work full time until at least January.

In the coming weeks, Uber and other tech companies are expecting to learn more from the DOL's Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The agency is set to release an Emergency Temporary Standard to require vaccine or weekly testing mandates at companies with 100 or more employees.

Will remote workers have to get vaccinated or tested?

When companies started mandating vaccination earlier this year, it was understood as an effort to prevent the virus from spreading at the office. Why should a company require remote workers — those who never see their colleagues — to get vaccinated?

Federal officials have already indicated that the emergency rule won't apply to remote workers who never go to the office.

If the rule were to apply to remote workers, McLaughlin said that might undermine OSHA's use of the emergency temporary standard and get outside of the agency's purview — which is the workplace.

"It would be unusual for the OSHA rules to require the vaccination for employees who aren't coming to a work location," said Rea. "If someone's working remotely there's arguably no reason it's protecting the worker."

But that doesn't mean companies themselves won't apply them to remote workers — and Validity is proving that there's at least some appetite to do so in the tech sector.

The company isn't alone: Its owners, Silversmith Capital Partners and Providence Strategic Growth, supported a similar set of policies that were applied to other portfolio companies, Piispanen said.

There are several reasons for applying the vaccine mandate to remote workers. For one, in a fierce market for top tech talent, Validity sees its employees as indispensable experts who need to be available to work.

"Having them get sick will have a detrimental impact to our customers and to our business," Piispanen said. "I also think there is a little bit of a duty to care for us as employers for our employees. The science supports vaccines — there's no denying that."

Climate

This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Workplace

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Climate

The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Policy

White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins