Protocol Workplace Tech Employee Survey

Hypocrisy and marketing: How workers feel about diversity in tech

A Protocol survey finds that 54% of tech workers think it's important for companies to speak out about race-related events.

Sign that says rethink your hiring practices they do not reflect justice or equality

Workers have mixed feelings about tech's diversity efforts.

Photo: Boston Globe/Getty Images

The tech industry was once a place obsessed with the idea of meritocracy, and moving fast and breaking things. There are undoubtedly still people within the industry who subscribe to those ideas, but a new era exists in tech where companies, executives and employees are rethinking their roles and responsibilities within broader society.

Last summer's racial justice protests in light of the murder of George Floyd, for example, sparked an enormous response from the tech industry. Many companies made statements in support of Black Lives Matter, and committed money to certain racial justice causes and organizations. Whether or not those statements were genuine, many tech workers believe that companies do have a responsibility to speak out about race-related events, and they expect to be able to discuss social and political issues at work.

In a new Protocol survey, in partnership with Morning Consult, 54% of tech workers said companies have a responsibility to speak up about tragic and/or racially motivated events affecting racial or ethnic minorities, and that they appreciate it when their companies do this. Over half (59%) of Black tech workers who responded said it was important for companies to make a statement, and felt most strongly about companies speaking out about those types of events compared to other racial groups.

It was actually Pinterest's statement about Black lives mattering that encouraged tech whistleblower Ifeoma Ozoma, a Black woman, to speak up about her experience at Pinterest when she did. But it's perhaps not for the reason one would expect.

"Nothing gets me more jazzed than hypocrisy," Ozoma said earlier this week at a Protocol Live event. "At some point, I probably would have told my story, but that date was moved up because of Pinterest's statement."

Ozoma does not believe Pinterest or any other tech company has lived up to the message that Black lives do matter. In order to live up to that message, Ozoma recommends simply paying people fairly as a starting point.

"That seems like a pretty good baseline for saying that Black employees and Black lives matter," she said. "And then from there, we can have a conversation. But so many companies are not even doing that baseline ... so there isn't a conversation to be had yet, and certainly not about the marketing-focused diversity initiatives that many companies are currently engaged in."

Many tech companies talk about working to close the wage gap, and many say they have. However, wage gaps are still common throughout the tech industry. Black job candidates, for example, received offers that were 4% lower in salary than those received by white men, according to a 2021 pay equity report from Hired.

Meanwhile, diversity representation numbers have improved over the years, but no major tech company is anywhere close to achieving full demographic parity.

Project Include, led by CEO Ellen Pao, has previously outlined a roadmap for tech companies to achieve parity in the workplace. In order to achieve parity, companies should aim for the following employee representation: 13% Black, 17% Latinx, 5% nonbinary and 45% women.

But many tech companies are nowhere near those figures. Amazon is the only major tech company that comes somewhat close, but there's still a large gap between where it is and where it needs to be. Amazon says its corporate U.S. workforce is 7.2% Black, 7.5% Latinx and 31.4% female, according to its latest diversity numbers.

Despite the limited progress over the years, 87% of technology workers agreed that their respective companies take diversity, equity and inclusion seriously, according to Protocol's worker survey. That positivity declines, however, when looking at the responses of Black and Latinx tech workers, which drops to 83% and 81%, respectively.

In the event that companies don't take diversity and inclusion seriously, workers seem empowered to speak up. According to our survey, 71% of workers say it's important to discuss politics and other social issues at work and 72% of tech workers say they're comfortable doing so.

Though, perhaps unsurprisingly, white people (75%) feel most comfortable talking about these issues, compared to just 58% of Black workers and 62% of Asian American workers. Millennials (86%) feel the most comfortable talking about these issues, followed by those in Gen X (72%), Gen Z (60%) and the Baby Boomer generation (55%).

When Basecamp decided to pull a Coinbase and ban internal discussions of politics and social issues, the backlash was swift. Within a week of the announcement, about 34% of Basecamp's workforce announced their resignations.

Since then, many other companies have spoken out in support of having social and political discussions at their companies. Expensify is one of them.

"I think that the idea that somehow companies are, you know, separate from society is just crazy," Expensify CEO David Barrett said in a Protocol event earlier this week.

Barrett said it's absurd for companies to restrict those types of conversations, especially given how much time people spend at work. He added that "everything is political" and it's simply "part of being human."


A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories