Protocol Workplace Tech Employee Survey

Hypocrisy and marketing: How workers feel about diversity in tech

A Protocol survey finds that 54% of tech workers think it's important for companies to speak out about race-related events.

Sign that says rethink your hiring practices they do not reflect justice or equality

Workers have mixed feelings about tech's diversity efforts.

Photo: Boston Globe/Getty Images

The tech industry was once a place obsessed with the idea of meritocracy, and moving fast and breaking things. There are undoubtedly still people within the industry who subscribe to those ideas, but a new era exists in tech where companies, executives and employees are rethinking their roles and responsibilities within broader society.

Last summer's racial justice protests in light of the murder of George Floyd, for example, sparked an enormous response from the tech industry. Many companies made statements in support of Black Lives Matter, and committed money to certain racial justice causes and organizations. Whether or not those statements were genuine, many tech workers believe that companies do have a responsibility to speak out about race-related events, and they expect to be able to discuss social and political issues at work.

In a new Protocol survey, in partnership with Morning Consult, 54% of tech workers said companies have a responsibility to speak up about tragic and/or racially motivated events affecting racial or ethnic minorities, and that they appreciate it when their companies do this. Over half (59%) of Black tech workers who responded said it was important for companies to make a statement, and felt most strongly about companies speaking out about those types of events compared to other racial groups.

It was actually Pinterest's statement about Black lives mattering that encouraged tech whistleblower Ifeoma Ozoma, a Black woman, to speak up about her experience at Pinterest when she did. But it's perhaps not for the reason one would expect.

"Nothing gets me more jazzed than hypocrisy," Ozoma said earlier this week at a Protocol Live event. "At some point, I probably would have told my story, but that date was moved up because of Pinterest's statement."

Ozoma does not believe Pinterest or any other tech company has lived up to the message that Black lives do matter. In order to live up to that message, Ozoma recommends simply paying people fairly as a starting point.

"That seems like a pretty good baseline for saying that Black employees and Black lives matter," she said. "And then from there, we can have a conversation. But so many companies are not even doing that baseline ... so there isn't a conversation to be had yet, and certainly not about the marketing-focused diversity initiatives that many companies are currently engaged in."

Many tech companies talk about working to close the wage gap, and many say they have. However, wage gaps are still common throughout the tech industry. Black job candidates, for example, received offers that were 4% lower in salary than those received by white men, according to a 2021 pay equity report from Hired.

Meanwhile, diversity representation numbers have improved over the years, but no major tech company is anywhere close to achieving full demographic parity.

Project Include, led by CEO Ellen Pao, has previously outlined a roadmap for tech companies to achieve parity in the workplace. In order to achieve parity, companies should aim for the following employee representation: 13% Black, 17% Latinx, 5% nonbinary and 45% women.

But many tech companies are nowhere near those figures. Amazon is the only major tech company that comes somewhat close, but there's still a large gap between where it is and where it needs to be. Amazon says its corporate U.S. workforce is 7.2% Black, 7.5% Latinx and 31.4% female, according to its latest diversity numbers.

Despite the limited progress over the years, 87% of technology workers agreed that their respective companies take diversity, equity and inclusion seriously, according to Protocol's worker survey. That positivity declines, however, when looking at the responses of Black and Latinx tech workers, which drops to 83% and 81%, respectively.

In the event that companies don't take diversity and inclusion seriously, workers seem empowered to speak up. According to our survey, 71% of workers say it's important to discuss politics and other social issues at work and 72% of tech workers say they're comfortable doing so.

Though, perhaps unsurprisingly, white people (75%) feel most comfortable talking about these issues, compared to just 58% of Black workers and 62% of Asian American workers. Millennials (86%) feel the most comfortable talking about these issues, followed by those in Gen X (72%), Gen Z (60%) and the Baby Boomer generation (55%).

When Basecamp decided to pull a Coinbase and ban internal discussions of politics and social issues, the backlash was swift. Within a week of the announcement, about 34% of Basecamp's workforce announced their resignations.

Since then, many other companies have spoken out in support of having social and political discussions at their companies. Expensify is one of them.

"I think that the idea that somehow companies are, you know, separate from society is just crazy," Expensify CEO David Barrett said in a Protocol event earlier this week.

Barrett said it's absurd for companies to restrict those types of conversations, especially given how much time people spend at work. He added that "everything is political" and it's simply "part of being human."

A visitor plays a game using Microsoft's Xbox controller at a flagship store of SK Telecom in Seoul on November 10, 2020. (Photo by Jung Yeon-je / AFP) (Photo by JUNG YEON-JE/AFP via Getty Images)

On this episode of the Source Code podcast: Nick Statt joins the show to discuss Microsoft’s $68.7 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard, and what it means for the tech and game industries. Then, Issie Lapowsky talks about a big week in antitrust reform, and whether real progress is being made in the U.S. Finally, Hirsh Chitkara explains why AT&T, Verizon, the FAA and airlines have been fighting for months about 5G coverage.

For more on the topics in this episode:

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

COVID-19 accelerated what many CEOs and CTOs have struggled to do for the past decade: It forced organizations to be agile and adjust quickly to change. For all the talk about digital transformation over the past decade, when push came to shove, many organizations realized they had made far less progress than they thought.

Now with the genie of rapid change out of the bottle, we will never go back to accepting slow and steady progress from our organizations. To survive and thrive in times of disruption, you need to build a resilient, adaptable business with systems and processes that will keep you nimble for years to come. An essential part of business agility is responding to change by quickly developing new applications and adapting old ones. IT faces an unprecedented demand for new applications. According to IDC, by 2023, more than 500 million digital applications and services will be developed and deployed — the same number of apps that were developed in the last 40 years.[1]

Keep Reading Show less
Denise Broady, CMO, Appian
Denise oversees the Marketing and Communications organization where she is responsible for accelerating the marketing strategy and brand recognition across the globe. Denise has over 24+ years of experience as a change agent scaling businesses from startups, turnarounds and complex software companies. Prior to Appian, Denise worked at SAP, WorkForce Software, TopTier and Clarkston Group. She is also a two-time published author of “GRC for Dummies” and “Driven to Perform.” Denise holds a double degree in marketing and production and operations from Virginia Tech.

Congress’ antitrust push has a hate speech problem

Sen. Klobuchar’s antitrust bill is supposed to promote competition. So why are advocates afraid it could also promote extremists?

The bill as written could make it a lot riskier for large tech companies to deplatform or demote companies that violate their rules.

Photo: Photo by Elizabeth Frantz-Pool/Getty Images

The antitrust bill that passed the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday and is now headed to the Senate floor is, at its core, an attempt to prevent the likes of Apple, Amazon and Google from boosting their own products and services on the marketplaces and platforms they own.

But upon closer inspection, some experts say, the bill as written could make it a lot riskier for large tech companies to deplatform or demote companies that violate their rules.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Ask a tech worker: How many of your colleagues have caught omicron?

Millions of workers called in sick in recent weeks. How is tech handling it?

A record number of Americans called in sick with COVID-19 in recent weeks. Even with high vaccination rates, tech companies aren’t immune.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Welcome back to Ask a Tech Worker! For this recurring feature, I’ve been roaming downtown San Francisco at lunchtime to ask tech employees about how the workplace is changing. This week, I caught up with tech workers about what their companies are doing to avoid omicron outbreaks, and whether many of their colleagues had been out sick lately. Got an idea for a future topic? Email me.

Omicron stops for no one, it seems. Between Dec. 29 and Jan. 10, 8.8 million Americans missed work to either recover from COVID-19 or care for someone who was recovering, according to the Census Bureau. That number crushed the previous record of 6.6 million from last January, and tripled the numbers from early last month.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.

The fast-growing paychecks of Big Tech’s biggest names

Tech giants had a huge pandemic, and their execs are getting paid.

TIm Cook received $82 million in stock awards on top of his $3 million salary as Apple's CEO.

Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images

Tech leaders are making more than ever.

As tech giants thrive amid the pandemic, companies like Meta, Alphabet and Microsoft have continued to pay their leaders accordingly: Big Tech CEO pay is higher than ever. In the coming months, we’ll begin seeing a lot of companies release their executive compensation from the past year as fiscal 2022 begins.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht
Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.
Latest Stories